scholarly journals Cost-utility analysis of an implantable cardioverterdefibrillator for the treatment of patients with ischemic or non-ischemic New York Heart Association class II or III heart failure in Colombia

Biomédica ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 502-512
Author(s):  
Sara Atehortúa ◽  
Juan Manuel Senior ◽  
Paula Castro ◽  
Mateo Ceballos ◽  
Clara Saldarriaga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
New York ◽  
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator ◽  
Heart Association ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Cost Utility ◽  
Cardioverter Defibrillator ◽  
Association Class ◽  
New York Heart Association ◽  
Quality Adjusted Life

Introduction: The use of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator reduces the probability of sudden cardiac death in patients with heart failure.Objective: To determine the cost-utility relationship of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator compared to optimal pharmacological therapy for patients with ischemic or non-ischemic New York Heart Association class II or III (NYHA II-III) heart failure in Colombia.Materials and methods: We developed a Markov model including costs, effectiveness, and quality of life from the perspective of the Colombian health system. For the baseline case, we adopted a time horizon of 10 years and discount rates of 3% for costs and 3.5% for benefits.The transition probabilities were obtained from a systematic review of the literature. The outcome used was the quality-adjusted life years. We calculated the costs by consulting with the manufacturers of the device offered in the Colombian market and using national-level pricing manuals. We conducted probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses.Results: In the base case, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator was USD$ 13,187 per quality-adjusted life year gained. For a willingness-to-pay equivalent to three times the gross domestic product per capita as a reference (USD$ 19,139 in 2017), the device would be a cost-effective strategy for the Colombian health system. However, the result may change according to the time horizon, the probability of death, and the price of the device.Conclusions: The use of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for preventing sudden cardiac death in patients with heart failure would be a cost-effective strategy for Colombia. The results should be examined considering the uncertainty.

Giving intravenous iron to patients with symptomatic heart failure is safe and cost effective

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
James Redfern ◽  
Rachel Goode ◽  
Wing Yin Leung ◽  
Clare Quarterman ◽  
Archana Rao
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Heart Failure ◽  
New York ◽  
Heart Association ◽  
Intravenous Iron ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Ferric Carboxymaltose ◽  
Association Class ◽  
New York Heart Association

Aims/Background Heart failure affects approximately 1 million people in the UK, adversely affecting quality of life, functional capacity and cognitive health. Iron deficiency complicates heart failure in approximately 50% of patients. Giving intravenous ferric carboxymaltose has been shown to improve quality of life in patients with heart failure (New York Heart Association class and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire). Methods A quality improvement project was designed to assess the feasibility, safety and cost implications of establishing an intravenous iron service in the authors' centre. Results Between July and December 2019 61 patients who were screened met the inclusion criteria and were administered intravenous ferric carboxymaltose. There were statistically significant improvements in ferritin levels (83.3 ug/litre to 433 ug/litre; P<0.0001), transferrin saturation (18% to 30% P<0.0001) and haemoglobin levels (126 g/litre to 135 g/litre; P<0.01). No demonstrable changes in New York Heart Association class or quality of life scores were noted. The overall financial impact for the trust was income generation of £14 665, a net income of £240 per patient. Conclusions Intravenous iron replacement with ferric carboxymaltose is safe and cost effective, and should be considered in eligible iron-deficient patients with symptomatic heart failure. Integration with another day case intravenous service represented the most logistically simple and economically viable method of service delivery.

Abstract 2848: Medication Knowledge And Assistance In Older Chronic Heart Failure Patients.

Circulation ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 116 (suppl_16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Robyn Gallagher ◽  
Judith Donoghue ◽  
Lynn Chenoweth ◽  
Jane Stein-Parbury
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
New York ◽  
Chronic Heart Failure ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Heart Association ◽  
Post Discharge ◽  
Medication Knowledge ◽  
Moderate Heart Failure ◽  
Association Class ◽  
New York Heart Association

Medication knowledge and assistance in older chronic heart failure (CHF) patients. Medication adherence is central to the optimal management of CHF. Little is known about older patients’ knowledge of their medications or the factors that contribute to this knowledge. Aim: To describe and identify the predictors of medication knowledge in older CHF patients. Method: Subjects ( n = 62) aged over 55 years with moderate heart failure (New York Heart Association Class II and III) who identified as self-managing were recruited from hospital or rehabilitation. Interviews occurred at home four weeks post-discharge using a medication checklist and the Self-Efficacy in Chronic Illness Scale (Lorig et al, 2001). Multiple regression analysis determined the predictors of medication knowledge. Results: Patients were aged mean 78.4 years (sd 8.54 years), mostly male (57%) and had an average 8 (median, range 3–22) medications to take daily, of which 6 (median, range 3–14) were for CHF. Most managed their own medications (54%) but more than a quarter (28%) were assisted by reminding, dispensing and supervision. Compliance with medications was high (84%), although only half (53%) knew the name, main purpose and side effect of their medications. Patients with better self-efficacy (β = 2.88) and no help with medication (β = -21.05) had better medication knowledge (model F = 13.6, p = .000, R = .61, r 2 = .37). Conclusion: Older CHF patients have poor knowledge of their medications, which may be improved by promoting overall self-efficacy for disease management. Less knowledgeable patients received appropriate assistance with medications, but the consequence may be less knowledge and thus warrants further investigation.

scholarly journals Impact of Left Ventricular Function and Heart Failure Symptoms on Outcomes Post Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Sohns ◽  
Konstantin Zintl ◽  
Yan Zhao ◽  
Lilas Dagher ◽  
Dietrich Andresen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
New York ◽  
Ventricular Dysfunction ◽  
Heart Association ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Pharmacological Therapy ◽  
York Heart Association Class ◽  
Association Class ◽  
New York Heart Association

Background: Recent data demonstrate promising effects on left ventricular dysfunction and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improvement following ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with heart failure. We sought to study the relationship between LVEF, New York Heart Association class on presentation, and the end points of mortality and heart failure admissions in the CASTLE-AF study (Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation With Heart Failure) population. Furthermore, predictors for LVEF improvement were examined. Methods: The CASTLE-AF patients with coexisting heart failure and AF (n=363) were randomized in a multicenter prospective controlled fashion to ablation (n=179) versus pharmacological therapy (n=184). Left ventricular function and New York Heart Association class were assessed at baseline (after randomization) and at each follow-up visit. Results: In the ablation arm, a significantly higher number of patients experienced an improvement in their LVEF to >35% at the end of the study (odds ratio, 2.17; P <0.001). Compared with the pharmacological therapy arm, both ablation patient groups with severe (<20%) or moderate/severe (≥20% and <35%) baseline LVEF had a significantly lower number of composite end points (hazard ratio [HR], 0.60; P =0.006), all-cause mortality (HR, 0.54; P =0.019), and cardiovascular hospitalizations (HR, 0.66; P =0.017). In the ablation group, New York Heart Association I/II patients at the time of treatment had the strongest improvement in clinical outcomes (primary end point: HR, 0.43; P <0.001; mortality: HR, 0.30; P =0.001). Conclusions: Compared with pharmacological treatment, AF ablation was associated with a significant improvement in LVEF, independent from the severity of left ventricular dysfunction. AF ablation should be performed at early stages of the patient’s heart failure symptoms.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document