Introduction. In relation to pre-hospital treatment of patients with cardiac
arrest (CA) in the field where resuscitation is often started by
nonprofessionals, resuscitation in hospital is most commonly performed by
well-trained personnel. Objective. The aim was to define the factors
associated with an improved outcome among patients suffering from the
inhospital CA (IHCA). Methods. The prospective study included a total of 100
patients in the Emergency Center over two-year period. The patterns by the
Utstein-Style guidelines recorded the following: age, sex, reason for
hospital admission, comorbidity, cause and origin of CA, continuous
monitoring, time of arrival of the medical emergency team and time of
delivery of the first defibrillation shock (DC). Results. Most patients (61%)
had cardiac etiology. Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was achieved
in 58% of patients. ROSC was more frequently achieved in younger patients
(57.69?11.37), (p<0.05), non-surgical patients (76.1%), (p<0.01) and in
patients who were in continuous monitoring (66.7%) (p<0.05). The outcome of
CPR was significantly better in patients who received advanced life support
(ALS) (76.6%) (p<0.01). Time until the delivery of the first DC shock was
significantly shorter in patients who achieved ROSC (1.67?1.13 min),
(p<0.01). A total of 5% of IHCA patients survived to hospital discharge.
Conclusion. In our study, the outcome of CPR was better in patients who were
younger and with non-surgical diseases, which are prognostic factors that we
cannot control. Factors associated with better outcome of IHCA patients were:
continuous monitoring, shorter time until the delivery of the first DC and
ALS. This means that better education of medical staff, better organization
and up-to-dated technical equipment are needed.