Reporting Relationships of a Response Organization with the Responsible Party

1999 ◽  
Vol 1999 (1) ◽  
pp. 665-670
Author(s):  
David A. Friendly

ABSTRACT When a marine oil spill occurs there are critical challenges that fall into four categories—the Four Cs—that face the Responsible Party (RP): the Casualty, the Community, the Corporation, and the Cleanup. In the case of a company that has a corporate response team, it will be charged with the management of all four categories. In Canada, the detailed management of the Cleanup can be delegated to the Certified Response Organization (RO). However, a reporting relationship from the RO to the RP response management team must be established, both to ensure they keep each other informed and to avoid duplication or conflict in cleanup activities. Since the Cleanup is primarily a responsibility of the RP Operations Section, the reporting chain during the Initial Response Phase and Tactical Phase should be from the RO Spill Response Manager to the RP Operations Manager. Once the Cleanup is the only ongoing challenge, the RP team may be disbanded and only re-assembled for progress assessments of the RO work. During this Strategic Phase of the response, the RO Spill Response Manager will report directly to the RP On-Scene Commander or delegate.

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 (1) ◽  
pp. 2017031
Author(s):  
Steven Buschang

Texas produces nearly twice and much oil as the next highest producing U.S. state and has approximately 3300 miles of sensitive jurisdictional shoreline boarding the second highest area of our nation's oil production, the Gulf of Mexico. It is home to over 27 operating refineries and hosts 3 of the top 10 busiest ports in the nation. Since 1991, the Texas General Land Office (TGLO) has built an oil spill prevention and response program that is arguably the premier state oil spill program in the nation; one that responds 24/7 to over 600 reported spills per year, certifies, audits and inspects over 600 oil handling facilities, administers an abandoned vessel removal program, an oily bilge facility program, and has an ongoing oil spill R&D program and its own state Scientific Support Coordinator, ensuring that prevention, planning and response activities are state of the science. The TGLO produces the Texas Oil Spill Toolkit, now in its 17th edition, which is a spill planning and response resource for the western Gulf of Mexico, and houses a collection of plans and documents in a single, easy to use online/off-line .html format. Plans include up-to-date Area Committee Plans (ACP) and pre-planning documents, all aligned with the National Response Framework (NRF). Included are Regional Response Team VI (RRT) documents and guidance, pre-authorization plans and mapping for alternative spill response, Priority Protection Areas (PPA), Environmental Sensitivity Index Maps (ESI), and site specific Geographic Response Plans (GRP). This paper describes the conception, history and evolution of the building and operation of a state response organization in an era of “less government”.


1999 ◽  
Vol 1999 (1) ◽  
pp. 671-676
Author(s):  
Carolyn M. White

ABSTRACT Failure to attend to causation and liability issues as soon as an incident occurs in the United States will haunt any (potentially) responsible party long after the actual response efforts have ended. Even during the often chaotic phase of initial response efforts, it is critical for responsible parties to have a system in place for handling internal investigations as well as responding to government inquiries. This paper describes issues and procedures that should be planned well in advance of a spill, and suggests specific steps for a company to follow to protect its interests during an internal company or external government investigation. Topics include preserving physical evidence, protecting the confidentiality of internal investigative records, identifying when the government is in an investigatory role, protecting the company and individuals during government interviews, and managing the resources dedicated to responding to an investigation while also cleaning up the spill.


1989 ◽  
Vol 1989 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stanley L. Laskowski ◽  
Thomas C. Voltaggio

ABSTRACT The Ashland oil spill of January, 1988 near Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, was one of the largest inland releases of oil in U.S. history. The response to this release lasted over a month and involved the combined resources of government, industry, and the public. This paper discusses the spill incident, the response, and the causes of the release; an inquiry into the regulatory aspects of this incident is continuing and is not a focus here. The major issues brought out in the response to the release were the determination of the cause of the release, the role that the responsible party played in the cleanup efforts, the role of the first responders to the release, and the role that governmental agencies played in maintaining adequate water supplies to the many communities which take their drinking water from the Monongahela and Ohio rivers. The response to the release and the methods which were used to track the plume and provide early warning to downstream users, as well as the active role played by the Regional Response Team in coordinating the many governmental entities involved are described.


Pollutants ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-28
Author(s):  
Davide Seveso ◽  
Yohan Didier Louis ◽  
Simone Montano ◽  
Paolo Galli ◽  
Francesco Saliu

In light of the recent marine oil spill that occurred off the coast of Mauritius (Indian Ocean), we comment here the incident, the containment method used by the local population, the biological impact of oil spill on two sensitive tropical marine ecosystems (coral reefs and mangrove forests), and we suggest monitoring and restoration techniques of the impacted ecosystems based on recent research advancements.


2021 ◽  
Vol 165 ◽  
pp. 112025
Author(s):  
Jesse Ross ◽  
David Hollander ◽  
Susan Saupe ◽  
Adrian B. Burd ◽  
Sherryl Gilbert ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 1607
Author(s):  
Guannan Li ◽  
Ying Li ◽  
Yongchao Hou ◽  
Xiang Wang ◽  
Lin Wang

Marine oil spill detection is vital for strengthening the emergency commands of oil spill accidents and repairing the marine environment after a disaster. Polarimetric Synthetic Aperture Radar (Pol-SAR) can obtain abundant information of the targets by measuring their complex scattering matrices, which is conducive to analyze and interpret the scattering mechanism of oil slicks, look-alikes, and seawater and realize the extraction and detection of oil slicks. The polarimetric features of quad-pol SAR have now been extended to oil spill detection. Inspired by this advancement, we proposed a set of improved polarimetric feature combination based on polarimetric scattering entropy H and the improved anisotropy A12–H_A12. The objective of this study was to improve the distinguishability between oil slicks, look-alikes, and background seawater. First, the oil spill detection capability of the H_A12 combination was observed to be superior than that obtained using the traditional H_A combination; therefore, it can be adopted as an alternate oil spill detection strategy to the latter. Second, H(1 − A12) combination can enhance the scattering randomness of the oil spill target, which outperformed the remaining types of polarimetric feature parameters in different oil spill scenarios, including in respect to the relative thickness information of oil slicks, oil slicks and look-alikes, and different types of oil slicks. The evaluations and comparisons showed that the proposed polarimetric features can indicate the oil slick information and effectively suppress the sea clutter and look-alike information.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document