scholarly journals Impact of Glissonean Pedicle Approach for Centrally Located Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Mongolia

2015 ◽  
Vol 100 (2) ◽  
pp. 268-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jigjidsuren Chinburen ◽  
Michele Gillet ◽  
Masakazu Yamamoto ◽  
Tsiiregzen Enkh-Amgalan ◽  
Erdenebileg Taivanbaatar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Liver Resection ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Conventional Approach ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Extended Hepatectomy ◽  
Glissonean Approach ◽  
Glissonean Pedicle ◽  
Approach Group ◽  
Overall Survival Rates

Approaches to surgical resection of centrally located HCC remain controversial. Traditionally, hemi- or extended hepatectomy is suggested. However, it carries a high risk of postoperative complications in patients with cirrhosis. An alternative approach is Glissonean pedicle transection method. This study was conducted to assess the surgical and survival outcomes associated with central liver resection using the Glissonean pedicle transection. Sixty-nine patients with centrally located HCC were studied retrospectively. They were divided into conventional approach group with hemi- or extended hepatectomy, and Glissonean approach group with multisegmental central liver resection using the Glissonean pedicle transection. Glissonean pedicle transection method has comparable or superior surgical and survival outcomes to conventional hemi- or extended hepatectomy with regard to intraoperative bleeding, complications, hospital stay, and postoperative mortality and survival outcomes in patients with centrally located HCC. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates of the conventional approach group were 74%, 64%, and 55% respectively. For the Glissonean approach group, the 1 and 3-year overall survival rates were 86% and 61%, respectively. Glissonean pedicle transection method is a safe and effective surgical procedure in patients with centrally located HCC.

scholarly journals Meta-analysis of the effect of the pringle maneuver on long-term oncological outcomes following liver resection

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elias Khajeh ◽  
Saeed Shafiei ◽  
Sadeq Ali-Hasan Al-Saegh ◽  
Ali Ramouz ◽  
Ahmed Hammad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Liver Resection ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Pringle Maneuver ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Oncological Outcomes ◽  
Overall Survival Rates

AbstractHepatic pedicle clamping reduces intraoperative blood loss and the need for transfusion, but its long-term effect on survival and recurrence remains controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of the Pringle maneuver (PM) on long-term oncological outcomes in patients with primary or metastatic liver malignancies who underwent liver resection. Literature was searched in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Medline (via PubMed), and Web of Science databases. Survival was measured as the survival rate or as a continuous endpoint. Pooled estimates were represented as odds ratios (ORs) using the Mantel–Haenszel test with a random-effects model. The literature search retrieved 435 studies. One RCT and 18 NRS, including 7480 patients who underwent liver resection with the PM (4309 cases) or without the PM (3171 cases) were included. The PM did not decrease the 1-year overall survival rate (OR 0.86; 95% CI 0.67–1.09; P = 0.22) or the 3- and 5-year overall survival rates. The PM did not decrease the 1-year recurrence-free survival rate (OR 1.06; 95% CI 0.75–1.50; P = 0.75) or the 3- and 5-year recurrence-free survival rates. There is no evidence that the Pringle maneuver has a negative effect on recurrence-free or overall survival rates.

scholarly journals Long-term analysis of bilateral versus unilateral neck dissection in the treatment of early-stage supraglottic laryngeal cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 81-86
Author(s):  
Selin Ünsaler
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Neck Dissection ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Tumor Site ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Overall Survival Rates

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the effect of routine bilateral neck dissection on the survival outcomes of supraglottic laryngeal cancer patients with lateralized tumors and clinically negative necks. METHODS: The data of 234 patients surgically treated for supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma between January 2000 and September 2014 were retrospectively collected. Patients treated previously for head and neck cancer, patients who could not be contacted, and those with missing data were excluded. Of the remaining 187 patients, 124 patients with early-stage primaries (T1-T2) (116 males, 8 females; mean age: 55.5±9.5 years; range, 33 to 82 years) were included. Age and sex of the patients, site of the primary tumor, TNM stage, type of the neck dissection, length of follow-up, and survival rates were evaluated. The tumors were classified into three groups according to their relationship with the median line of the larynx, and the neck dissections were recorded as unilateral or bilateral. Recurrences and survival outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in the recurrences according to tumor site groups (p=0.39). Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference in 10-year overall survival rates in patient groups according to the tumor site (p=0.072). We found no statistically significant difference in 10-year overall survival rates between the patients who underwent unilateral and bilateral neck dissection (p=0.580). CONCLUSION: Long-term survival analysis of 124 patients with supraglottic carcinoma did not show a survival benefit of elective contralateral neck dissection in lateralized supraglottic cancer with contralateral clinically negative neck.

Survival outcomes following salvage surgery for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: systematic review

2017 ◽  
Vol 132 (4) ◽  
pp. 299-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
S S Kao ◽  
E H Ooi
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Salvage Surgery ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Overall Survival Rates

AbstractBackground:Recurrent oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma causes great morbidity and mortality. This systematic review analyses survival outcomes following salvage surgery for recurrent oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.Methods:A comprehensive search of various electronic databases was conducted. Studies included patients with recurrent or residual oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated with salvage surgery. Primary outcomes were survival rates following salvage surgery. Secondary outcomes included time to recurrence, staging at time of recurrence, post-operative complications, and factors associated with mortality and recurrence. Methodological appraisal and data extraction were conducted as per Joanna Briggs Institute methodology.Results:Eighteen articles were included. The two- and five-year survival rates of the patients were 52 per cent and 30 per cent respectively.Conclusion:Improvements in treatment modalities for recurrent oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma were associated with improvements in two-year overall survival rates, with minimal change to five-year overall survival rates. Various factors were identified as being associated with long-term overall survival, thus assisting clinicians in patient counselling and selection for salvage surgery.

scholarly journals Association of chemotherapy with survival in stage II colon cancer patients who received radical surgery: a retrospective cohort study

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhihao Lv ◽  
Yuqi Liang ◽  
Huaxi Liu ◽  
Delong Mo
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Prediction Models ◽  
Radical Surgery ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Survival Prediction ◽  
Stage Ii Colon Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival Rates

Abstract Background It remains controversial whether patients with Stage II colon cancer would benefit from chemotherapy after radical surgery. This study aims to assess the real effectiveness of chemotherapy in patients with stage II colon cancer undergoing radical surgery and to construct survival prediction models to predict the survival benefits of chemotherapy. Methods Data for stage II colon cancer patients with radical surgery were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed according to receive or not receive chemotherapy. Competitive risk regression models were used to assess colon cancer cause-specific death (CSD) and non-colon cancer cause-specific death (NCSD). Survival prediction nomograms were constructed to predict overall survival (OS) and colon cancer cause-specific survival (CSS). The predictive abilities of the constructed models were evaluated by the concordance indexes (C-indexes) and calibration curves. Results A total of 25,110 patients were identified, 21.7% received chemotherapy, and 78.3% were without chemotherapy. A total of 10,916 patients were extracted after propensity score matching. The estimated 3-year overall survival rates of chemotherapy were 0.7% higher than non- chemotherapy. The estimated 5-year and 10-year overall survival rates of non-chemotherapy were 1.3 and 2.1% higher than chemotherapy, respectively. Survival prediction models showed good discrimination (the C-indexes between 0.582 and 0.757) and excellent calibration. Conclusions Chemotherapy improves the short-term (43 months) survival benefit of stage II colon cancer patients who received radical surgery. Survival prediction models can be used to predict OS and CSS of patients receiving chemotherapy as well as OS and CSS of patients not receiving chemotherapy and to make individualized treatment recommendations for stage II colon cancer patients who received radical surgery.

Vaginal hysterectomy with or without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy may be an alternative treatment for endometrial cancer patients with medical co-morbidities precluding standard surgical procedures: a systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 299-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnold-Jan Kruse ◽  
Henk G ter Brugge ◽  
Harm H de Haan ◽  
Hugo W Van Eyndhoven ◽  
Hans W Nijman
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Vaginal Hysterectomy ◽  
Cancer Survival ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Ovarian Malignancy ◽  
Post Menopausal ◽  
Ovarian Cancer Survival ◽  
Overall Survival Rates

ObjectiveVaginal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy may be an alternative strategy for patients with low-risk endometrial cancer and medical co-morbidities precluding laparoscopic or abdominal procedures. The current study evaluates the prevalence of co-existent ovarian malignancy in patients with endometrial cancer and the influence of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy on survival outcomes in these patients.MethodsMedline and EMBASE were searched for studies published between January 1, 2000 and November 20, 2017 that investigated (1) the prevalence of co-existing ovarian malignancy (either metastases or primary synchronous ovarian cancer in women with endometrial cancer, and (2) the influence of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy on recurrence and/or survival rates.ResultsOf the pre-menopausal and post-menopausal patients (n=6059), 373 were identified with metastases and 106 were identified with primary synchronous ovarian cancer. Of the post-menopausal patients (n=6016), 362 were identified with metastases and 44 were identified with primary synchronous ovarian cancer. Survival outcomes did not differ for pre-menopausal patients with endometrial cancer with and without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (5-year overall survival rates were 89–94.5% and 86–97.8%, respectively).ConclusionBilateral salpingo-oophorectomy during vaginal hysterectomy seems to have a limited impact on disease outcome in patients with endometrial cancer. These results support the view that vaginal hysterectomy alone or with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy may be an option for patients with endometrial cancer who are not ideal surgical candidates.

scholarly journals Long Noncoding RNA Lnc-TLN2-4:1 Suppresses Gastric Cancer Metastasis and Is Associated with Patient Survival

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Yuyun Wu ◽  
Ningbo Hao ◽  
Suming Wang ◽  
Xin Yang ◽  
Yufeng Xiao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Noncoding Rna ◽  
Tumor Metastasis ◽  
Cancer Metastasis ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Migration And Invasion ◽  
Poor Overall Survival ◽  
Low Expression ◽  
Overall Survival Rates

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common malignancies worldwide, and the tumor metastasis leads to poor outcomes of GC patients. Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) have emerged as new regulatory molecules that play a crucial role in tumor metastasis. However, the biological function and underlying mechanism of numerous lncRNAs in GC metastasis remain largely unclear. Here, we report a novel lncRNA, lnc-TLN2-4:1, whose expression is decreased in GC tissue versus matched normal tissue, and its low expression is involved in the lymph node and distant metastases of GC, as well as poor overall survival rates of GC patients. We further found that lnc-TLN2-4:1 inhibits the ability of GC cells to migrate and invade but does not influence GC cell proliferation and confirmed that lnc-TLN2-4:1 is mainly located in the cytoplasm of GC cells. We then found that lnc-TLN2-4:1 increases the mRNA and protein expression of TLN2 in GC cells and there is a positive correlation between the expression of lnc-TLN2-4:1 and TLN2 mRNA in GC tissue. Collectively, we identified a novel lncRNA, lnc-TLN2-4:1, in GC, where lnc-TLN2-4:1 represses cell migration and invasion. The low expression of lnc-TLN2-4:1 is associated with poor overall survival rates of GC patients. These suggest that lnc-TLN2-4:1 may be a tumor suppressor during GC metastasis.

scholarly journals Survival and prognostic factors in HIV-infected adults treated with Antiretroviral Therapy in a Malaysian referral hospital: A retrospective cohort study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lee Sing Chet ◽  
Siti Azrin Ab Hamid ◽  
Norsa'adah Bachok ◽  
Suresh Kumar Chidambaram
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Antiretroviral Therapy ◽  
Haemoglobin Level ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Baseline Haemoglobin ◽  
History Of ◽  
Overall Survival Rates

Abstract Background: It is well established that antiretroviral therapy (ART) is beneficial in reducing the mortality among patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). In Malaysia, there is lack of study and information regarding the overall survival rates and prognostic factors for survival in HIV-infected adults treated with ART. Therefore, this study aimed to assess and compare the survival rates as well as to identify the prognostic factors for survival among HIV adults in Malaysia.Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted by reviewing the medical records of HIV patients who started ART between year 2007 and 2016 at a tertiary referral hospital in Malaysia. ART-naive adults aged 15 years and above were included and those who were transferred out were excluded. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, there were 339 cases eligible in this study. Systematic sampling method was applied. Kaplan Meier survival curve and log-rank test were used to compare the overall survival rates. Cox proportional hazards regression was applied to determine the prognostic factors for survival.Results: The estimated overall survival rates were 95.9%, 93.8%, 90.4%, 84.9%, and 72.8% at 6 months, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years and 10 years, respectively. The overall survival rates were significantly different according to age group (p<0.001), employment status (p<0.001), transmission mode (p=0.003), and history of illicit drug use (p=0.017), baseline CD4 cell count (p<0.001), baseline haemoglobin level (p<0.001), tuberculosis co-infection (p<0.001), hepatitis co-infection (p=0.008), first NRTI (p<0.001) and history of defaults (p=0.021). Based on multiple Cox regression, patients who were anaemic had 3.76 times (95% CI: 1.97, 7.18; p<0.001) higher hazard of death than their non-anaemic counterparts. The hazard risk was 2.09 times (95% CI: 1.10, 3.96; p=0.024) higher among HIV patients co-infected with tuberculosis compared to those who were not. Conclusion: Overall survival rates were higher than low-income countries but lower than in high-income countries, and comparable with middle-income countries. Low baseline haemoglobin level and tuberculosis co-infection were strong prognostic factors for HIV survival

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document