prophylactic vaccine
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

106
(FIVE YEARS 27)

H-INDEX

17
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (9) ◽  
pp. e0009742
Author(s):  
Stefano Malvolti ◽  
Melissa Malhame ◽  
Carsten F. Mantel ◽  
Epke A. Le Rutte ◽  
Paul M. Kaye

The development of vaccines against one or all forms of human leishmaniasis remains hampered by a paucity of investment, at least in part resulting from the lack of well-evidenced and agreed estimates of vaccine demand. Starting from the definition of 4 main use cases (prevention of visceral leishmaniasis, prevention of cutaneous leishmaniasis, prevention of post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis and treatment of post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis), we have estimated the size of each target population, focusing on those endemic countries where incidence levels are sufficiently high to justify decisions to adopt a vaccine. We assumed a dual vaccine delivery strategy, including a wide age-range catch-up campaign before the start of routine immunisation. Vaccine characteristics and delivery parameters reflective of a target product profile and the likely duration of the clinical development effort were considered in forecasting the demand for each of the four indications. Over a period of 10 years, this demand is forecasted to range from 300–830 million doses for a vaccine preventing visceral leishmaniasis and 557–1400 million doses for a vaccine preventing cutaneous leishmaniasis under the different scenarios we simulated. In a scenario with an effective prophylactic visceral leishmaniasis vaccine, demand for use to prevent or treat post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis would be more limited (over the 10 years ~160,000 doses for prevention and ~7,000 doses for treatment). Demand would rise to exceed 330,000 doses, however, in the absence of an effective vaccine for visceral leishmaniasis. Because of the sizeable demand and potential for public health impact, a single-indication prophylactic vaccine for visceral or cutaneous leishmaniasis, and even more so a cross-protective prophylactic vaccine could attract the interest of commercial developers. Continuous refinement of these first-of-their kind estimates and confirmation of country willingness and ability to pay will be paramount to inform the decisions of policy makers and developers in relation to a leishmaniasis vaccine. Positive decisions can provide a much-needed contribution towards the achievement of global leishmaniasis control.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeanne Naudet ◽  
Laurent Crespin ◽  
Julien Cappelle ◽  
Angeli Kodjo ◽  
Florence Ayral

Abstract Background: Leptospirosis is a widespread zoonotic disease caused by pathogenic Leptospira and is responsible for significant economic losses in porcine livestock. Knowledge of Leptospira serogroups and their distributions is important for evaluating the relevance of leptospirosis management measures, including the use of the prophylactic vaccine recently made available in France.A retrospective study was conducted to determine the distribution of Leptospira serogroups. Pigs from across France presenting clinical signs suggestive of leptospirosis were tested by micro-agglutination test between 2007 and 2017. We used a weighted average to determine the serogroup distributions according to the MAT results, considering cross reactions.Results: A total of 19,395 pig sera, mostly from Brittany, were tested, and 22.7 % were found to be positive for at least one Leptospira serogroup. In analysing the 4346 seropositive results for which the putative infective serogroup could be defined, we found that two serogroups out of ten were much more frequent than the others: Australis (48.5 %) and Icterohaemorrhagiae (38.2 %). Other serogroups, including Autumnalis, Panama, Ballum, Tarassovi, Sejroe, Grippotyphosa, Bataviae, and Pomona, were less common. Conclusion: Although data from diagnostic laboratories are prone to selection bias, using such a large amount of data provides a relevant overview of Leptospira distribution in space and time. Extracting epidemiological information with a standardized approach could be used for surveillance and support prophylactic strategies. Along the last decade, provide protection against the serogroups Australis and Icterohaemorrhagiae could prevent most of the clinical porcine leptospirosis in France.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Malvolti ◽  
Melissa Malhame ◽  
Carsten Mantel ◽  
Epke A Le Rutte ◽  
Paul M Kaye

The development of vaccines against one or all forms of human leishmaniasis remains hampered by a paucity of investment, at least in part resulting from the lack of well-evidenced and agreed estimates of vaccine demand. Starting from the definition of 4 main use cases (prevention of visceral leishmaniasis, prevention of cutaneous leishmaniasis, prevention of post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis and treatment of post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis), we have estimated the size of each target population, focusing on those endemic countries where incidence levels are sufficiently high to justify decisions to adopt a vaccine. We assumed a dual vaccine delivery strategy, including a wide age-range catch-up campaign before the start of routine immunisation. Vaccine characteristics and delivery parameters reflective of a target product profile and the likely duration of the clinical development effort were considered in forecasting the demand for each of the four indications. Over a period of 10 years, this demand is forecasted to range from 310-830 million doses for a vaccine preventing visceral leishmaniasis and 557-1400 million doses for a vaccine preventing cutaneous leishmaniasis under the different scenarios we simulated. In a scenario with an effective prophylactic visceral leishmaniasis vaccine, demand for use to prevent or treat post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis would be more limited (over the 10 years ~160,000 doses for prevention and ~7,000 doses for treatment). Demand would rise to exceed 330,000 doses, however, in the absence of an effective vaccine for visceral leishmaniasis. Because of the sizeable demand and potential for public health impact, a single-indication prophylactic vaccine for visceral or cutaneous leishmaniasis, and even more so a cross-protective prophylactic vaccine could attract the interest of commercial developers. Continuous refinement of these first-of-their kind estimates and confirmation of country willingness and ability to pay will be paramount to inform the decisions of policy makers and developers in relation to a leishmaniasis vaccine. Positive decisions can provide a much-needed contribution towards the achievement of global leishmaniasis control.


2021 ◽  
pp. 113867
Author(s):  
Chao Pan ◽  
Hua Yue ◽  
Li Zhu ◽  
Guang-hui Ma ◽  
Heng-liang Wang

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cong Sun ◽  
Xin-chun Chen ◽  
Yin-feng Kang ◽  
Mu-sheng Zeng

Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) is a human herpesvirus that is common among the global population, causing an enormous disease burden. EBV can directly cause infectious mononucleosis and is also associated with various malignancies and autoimmune diseases. In order to prevent primary infection and subsequent chronic disease, efforts have been made to develop a prophylactic vaccine against EBV in recent years, but there is still no vaccine in clinical use. The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic and the global cooperation in vaccine development against SARS-CoV-2 provide insights for next-generation antiviral vaccine design and opportunities for developing an effective prophylactic EBV vaccine. With improvements in antigen selection, vaccine platforms, formulation and evaluation systems, novel vaccines against EBV are expected to elicit dual protection against infection of both B lymphocytes and epithelial cells. This would provide sustainable immunity against EBV-associated malignancies, finally enabling the control of worldwide EBV infection and management of EBV-associated diseases.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 627
Author(s):  
Courtney T. Stump ◽  
Gregory Ho ◽  
Chenkai Mao ◽  
Frank A. Veliz ◽  
Veronique Beiss ◽  
...  

Ovarian cancer is the deadliest gynecological malignancy. Though most patients enter remission following initial interventions, relapse is common and often fatal. Accordingly, there is a substantial need for ovarian cancer therapies that prevent relapse. Following remission generated by surgical debulking and chemotherapy, but prior to relapse, resected and inactivated tumor tissue could be used as a personalized vaccine antigen source. The patient’s own tumor contains relevant antigens and, when combined with the appropriate adjuvant, could generate systemic antitumor immunity to prevent relapse. Here, we model this process in mice to investigate the optimal tumor preparation and vaccine adjuvant. Cowpea mosaic virus (CPMV) has shown remarkable efficacy as an immunostimulatory cancer therapy in ovarian cancer mouse models, so we use CPMV as an adjuvant in a prophylactic vaccine against a murine ovarian cancer model. Compared to its codelivery with tumor antigens prepared in three other ways, we show that CPMV co-delivered with irradiated ovarian cancer cells constitutes an effective prophylactic vaccine against a syngeneic model of ovarian cancer in C57BL/6J mice. Following two vaccinations, 72% of vaccinated mice reject tumor challenges, and all those mice survived subsequent rechallenges, demonstrating immunologic memory formation. This study supports remission-stage vaccines using irradiated patient tumor tissue as a promising option for treating ovarian cancer, and validates CPMV as an antitumor vaccine adjuvant for that purpose.


Vaccines ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 736 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abu Salim Mustafa

Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) has been widely used globally as a prophylactic vaccine to protect against tuberculosis (TB) for about a century [...]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document