Joint Line Obliquity Does Not Affect the Outcomes of Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy at an Average 10-Year Follow-up

Background: A significant number of high tibial osteotomies (HTOs) result in an overcorrected tibia and subsequent excessive lateral joint line obliquity (JLO). The correlation between excessive JLO and poor outcomes is controversial. Purpose: To evaluate the prognostic factors (including a pathological postoperative JLO) related with the outcomes of opening wedge HTO at 10 years of follow-up. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: All patients undergoing HTO between 2004 and 2017 for medial osteoarthritis and with a postoperative hip-knee-ankle angle between 176° and 185° were included. Clinical evaluation included Knee Society Score (KSS; knee score and function score), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and visual analog scale for pain. Several mechanical and anatomic angles were measured pre- and postoperatively on long-leg weightbearing radiographs. Abnormal JLO was defined as a Mikulicz–joint line angle (MJL) ≥94° or a mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA) ≥95°. Regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between independent variables and each outcome. A Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival analysis was performed. Results: A total of 92 knees in 76 patients were included. The mean age of the patients was 53.5 years (SD, 9.7 years), and the mean follow-up was 129.4 months (SD, 44.4 months). Increased JLO was associated with a significant preoperative varus deformity (small preoperative hip-knee-ankle angle), increased mechanical lateral distal femoral angle, increased joint line congruency angle, and increased knee-ankle joint angle. Male sex was associated with better WOMAC scores ( P = .0277), and increased body mass index (BMI) was associated with inferior WOMAC scores ( P = .0024). A good preoperative range of motion was associated with better knee score ( P = .0399) and function score ( P = .0366) on the KSS. An increased BMI was associated with inferior KSS function scores ( P = .0317). MJL ≥94° and mMPTA ≥95° were not associated with inferior WOMAC or KSS outcomes. With indication to total knee arthroplasty as an endpoint, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a survival rate of 98.7% at 5 years, 95.5% at 10 years, and 92.7% at 12 years. Conclusion: Increased lateral JLO (MJL ≥94° or mMPTA ≥95°) was not correlated with the clinical outcomes of opening wedge HTO at 10 years of follow-up.

A Comparison of Dynamic and Static Hip-Knee-Ankle Angle during Gait in Knee Osteoarthritis Patients and Healthy Individuals

Malalignment of the lower limbs is the main biomechanical factor for knee osteoarthritis (KOA). The static hip-knee-ankle angle (S-HKAA) measured from radiograph is regarded as the “gold standard” of the malalignment. However, many evidences showed that the S-HKAA has no significant correlation with the knee dynamic-load distribution, unlike the dynamic HKAA (D-HKAA). The purpose of this study was to quantitatively analyze the D-HKAA and investigate the relationship between D-HKAA and S-HKAA for both KOA and healthy participants. In this paper, twenty-five healthy subjects and twenty-five medial compartment KOA (M-KOA) patients were recruited. Three-dimensional motion analysis and standing lower-limbs-full-length radiograph were utilized to obtain the D-HKAA and S-HKAA, respectively. The results showed that the mean D-HKAA was more varus than the S-HKAA ( p < 0.05 ). For the mean D-HKAA, larger varus angle was observed in swing phase than stance phase ( p < 0.05 ). Compared with healthy subjects, the M-KOA patients had remarkably smaller S-HKAA and D-HKAA during gait cycle ( p < 0.01 ). For the relationship between the S-HKAA and mean D-HKAA, no significant correlation was found for both healthy subjects and M-KOA patients ( r < 0.357 , n = 25 , p > 0.05 , Spearman correlation analysis). In conclusion, the S-HKAA was limited to predict the D-HKAA for both M-KOA patients and healthy subjects. The D-HKAA should be given more attention to the orthopedist and the designer of knee brace and orthotics.

Relationship between the Height of Fibular Head and the Incidence and Severity of Knee Osteoarthritis

Objective: To investigate the correlation between fibular head height and the incidence and severity of varus knee osteoarthritis based on three-dimensional reconstruction of the knee joint.Methods: The data of knee joint imaging in our hospital from June 2018 to June 2020 were collected. The degree of varus deformity of the knee was assessed at the superior hip-knee-ankle angle of the X-rays. Three-dimensional reconstruction of patient computed tomography(CT)data was performed by mimics software. The fibular head height, joint line convergence angle (JLCA) and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) were measured in a three-dimensional model. The patients were divided according to the Kellgren-Lawrence grade: group A: grade 0, group B: grade I, group C: grade II, group D: grade III, and group E: grade IV. The differences in age, gender, height, weight, body mass index(BMI), fibular head height, and degree of varus deformity (JLCA, MPTA, and coxa-knee-ankle angle) were compared. Ordinal multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the correlation between fibular head height and Kellgren-Lawrence grade.Pearson correlation was used to analyze the correlation between fibular head height and Kellgren-Lawrence grade.Results: 232 patients (232 knees) were finally included in the study, with Kellgren-Lawrence grades of 28 in group A, 31 in group B, 49 in group C, 53 in group D, and 71 in group E. The differences in age, gender, height, body mass index, fibular head height, JLCA, MPTA, and hip-knee-ankle angle among the five groups were statistically significant (P < 0.05), and the differences in body weight were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). There were significant differences in fibular head height, JLCA, JLCA and hip-knee-ankle angle between different groups (P < 0.05). Furthermore, there were significant differences in JLCA and hip-knee-ankle angle (P < 0.05), and both JLCA and hip-knee-ankle angle increased with severe aggravation of Kellgren-Lawrence grade. Furthermore, both fibular head height and MPTA decreased as the Kellgren-Lawrence grade was severely aggravated. There was a significant negative correlation between Kellgren-Lawrence grade and fibular head height (r = -0.812, P < 0.001). Furthermore, there was a significant negative correlation between fibular head height and hip-knee-ankle angle (r = -0.7905, P < 0.001). When Kellgren-Lawrence grade III and IV knees were considered as disease, ROC curve analysis showed a cut-off value of 10.63 for fibular head height and an AUC of 0.872.Conclusion: The height of fibular head in patients with varus knee osteoarthritis is smaller than that in non-osteoarthritis patients. In addition to body mass index, fibular head height is a risk factor for the pathogenesis of varus knee osteoarthritis,the smaller the fibular head height, the more severe the severity of osteoarthritis and the more severe the degree of varus deformity.

Association of Preoperative Tibial Varus Deformity With Joint Line Orientation and Clinical Outcome After Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy for Medial Compartment Osteoarthritis: A Propensity Score–Matched Analysis

Background: The correction of lower limb deformity should be performed at the site of deformity to maintain knee joint orientation. However, the effectiveness of open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) for treatment of medial osteoarthritis in varus malalignment without definite tibial varus deformity has not been confirmed. Purpose/Hypothesis: This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiologic outcomes after OWHTO in patients without tibial varus deformity versus patients with tibial varus deformity after matching for confounding factors. We hypothesized that these outcomes would be inferior in patients without tibial varus deformity. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The outcomes of 133 OWHTO operations for medial osteoarthritis in 107 patients were retrospectively reviewed after follow-up for >2 years. The patients were divided into group 1 (tibia with varus deformity, preoperative medial proximal tibial angle [MPTA] <85°) and group 2 (tibia without varus deformity, preoperative MPTA ≥85°). The confounding factors, including patient characteristics, preoperative limb alignment, degree of osteoarthritis, and correction angle, were matched using propensity score matching. The radiologic parameters, including MPTA and joint line obliquity, were evaluated preoperatively, between 6 and 12 months postoperatively, and at the last follow-up. The radiologic outcomes were assessed using the medial joint space width and mechanical hip-knee-ankle angle. The clinical outcomes were evaluated by the Hospital for Special Surgery knee score, Knee Society Score (KSS), and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score. The clinical and radiologic outcomes were compared between the groups. The proportions of patients achieving improvement in the clinical outcome beyond the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) or minimally important change were compared between the groups. Results: After propensity score matching, 32 patients were selected for each group. The mechanical hip-knee-ankle angle was corrected without significant difference from a mean ± SD varus angle of 8.0°± 3.3° to valgus angle of −3.2°± 2.5° in group 1 and from varus 8.0°± 3.6° to valgus −3.9°± 1.7° in group 2. The preoperative joint line obliquity was greater in group 2 as compared with group 1 (2.2°± 2.2° vs −0.4°± 1.8°, P < .001). With a similar 10° correction angle, the postoperative MPTA and joint line obliquity were 96.6°± 2.5° and 5.3°± 2.3°, respectively, in group 2, which were greater than 94.0°± 2.6° and 3.5°± 1.8°, respectively, in group 1 (both P < .001). The changes in joint space width and mechanical hip-knee-ankle angle were not significantly different between the groups over the follow-up period. At the last follow-up, the postoperative KSS objective score and WOMAC pain score in terms of symptom improvement were not significantly different between groups ( P = .092 and .068). However, the postoperative KSS and WOMAC functional scores were significantly worse in group 2 than in group 1 (77.3 ± 14.1 vs 84.4 ± 11.6, P = .044; 10.3 ± 9.2 vs 5.6 ± 7.2, P = .001). In group 1, 96.9% and 100% of patients showed improvements of >10 points in the KSS functional score and 15 points in the WOMAC functional score based on MCID or minimally important change. Meanwhile, 65.6% and 81.3% of patients in group 2, which were significantly lower than those of group 1, were improved beyond the MCID or minimally important change ( P = .001 and .024, respectively). Conclusion: In varus malalignment, the knee joint line was more oblique in patients without tibial varus deformity after OWHTO pre- and postoperatively. The clinical outcomes in terms of functional scores were inferior in patients without tibial varus deformity. However, the radiologic outcomes and symptomatic improvement after OWHTO were comparable regardless of the preoperative tibial varus deformity on midterm follow-up.

Poor Correction Capacity of Preexisting Ankle Valgus Deformity after Total Knee Arthroplasty

This study investigated the differences in ankle alignment changes after TKA in patients with varying preexisting ankle deformities. We retrospectively examined 90 knees with osteoarthritis and varus deformity in 78 patients who underwent TKA. Preoperative and postoperative radiographic parameters were analyzed. According to their preexisting ankle deformity, patients were assigned to the valgus or varus group. Overall, 14 (15.6%) cases were of preoperative valgus ankle deformity; the remainder were of preoperative varus ankle deformity. Hip–knee–ankle angle (HKA), tibial plafond–ground angle (PGA), and talus–ground angle (TGA) all exhibited significant correction in both groups; however, tibial plafond–talus angle (PTA) and superior space of ankle joint (SS) only changed in the varus group. The median PTA and SS significantly decreased from 1.2° to 0.3° (p < 0.001) and increased from 2.5 to 2.6 mm (p = 0.013), respectively. Notably, ∆PTA positively correlated with ∆HKA in the varus group (r = 0.247, p = 0.032) but not in the valgus group. Between-group differences in postoperative PTA (p < 0.001) and ∆PTA (p < 0.001) were significant. The degree of ankle alignment correction after TKA differed between patients with preexisting varus and valgus ankle deformities. TKA could not effectively correct the preexisting ankle valgus malalignment.

Osteotomies around the knee lead to corresponding frontal realignment of the ankle

Introduction Despite the fact that osteotomies around the knee represent well-established treatment options for the redistribution of loads and forces within and around the knee joint, unforeseen effects of these osteotomies on the ankle are still to be better understood. It was therefore the aim of this study to determine the influence of osteotomies around the knee on the coronal alignment of the ankle. We hypothesize that osteotomies around the knee for correction of genu varum or valgum lead to a change of the ankle orientation in the frontal plane by valgisation or varisation. Materials and methods Long-leg standing radiographs of 154 consecutive patients undergoing valgisation or varisation osteotomy around the knee in 2017 were obtained and utilized for the purpose of this study. Postoperative radiographs were obtained after union at the osteotomy site. The hip knee ankle angle (HKA), the mechanical lateral distal femur angle (mLDFA), the mechanical medial proximal tibia angle (mMPTA) and five angles around the ankle were measured. Comparison between means was performed using the Wilcoxon-Mann–Whitney test. Results One hundred fifty-four patients (96 males, 58 females) underwent osteotomies around the knee for coronal realignment. The mean age was 51 ± 11 years. Correction osteotomies consisted of 73 HTO, 54 DFOs, and 27 double level osteotomies. Of all osteotomies, 118 were for valgisation and 36 for varisation. For valgisation osteotomies, the mean HKA changed from 5.8° ± 2.9° preoperatively to − 0.9° ± 2.5° postoperatively, whereas the mMPTA changed from 85.9° ± 2.7° to 90.7° ± 3.1° and the malleolar-horizontal-orientation-angle (MHA) changed from 16.4° ± 4.2° to 10.9° ± 4.2°. For varisation osteotomies, the mean HKA changed from − 4.3° ± 3.7° to 1.1° ± 2.2° postoperatively, whereas the mLDFA changed from 85.7° ± 2.2° to 89.3° ± 2.3° and the MHA changed from 8.8° ± 5.1° to 11.2° ± 3.2°. Conclusion Osteotomies around the knee for correction of coronal limb alignment not only lead to lateralization or medialization of the weight-bearing line at the knee but also lead to a coronal reorientation of the ankle. This can be measured at the ankle using the MHA. When planning an osteotomy around the knee for correction of genu varum or valgum, the ankle should also be appreciated—especially in patients with preexisting deformities, ligament instabilities, or joint degeneration around the ankle.

Effect of High Tibial Osteotomy on the Distribution of Subchondral Bone Density Across the Proximal Tibial Articular Surface of the Knee With Medial Compartment Osteoarthritis

Background: The effect of high tibial osteotomy (HTO) on the stress distribution across the knee joint is not completely understood. Subchondral bone density is considered to reflect the pattern of stress distribution across a joint surface. Purpose: To assess the distribution of subchondral bone density across the proximal tibia in nonarthritic knees and in the knees of patients with osteoarthritis (OA) before and after HTO. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: We retrospectively collected radiological and computed tomography data from 16 patients without OA (control group) and 17 patients with OA. Data from the OA group were collected before and 1.5 years after HTO. Subchondral bone density of the proximal tibia was assessed with computed tomography–osteoabsorptiometry. The locations and percentages represented by high-density areas (HDAs) on the articular surface were quantitatively analyzed. Results: The ratio of the HDA of the medial compartment to the total HDA (medial ratio) was significantly higher in the preoperative OA group (mean, 80.1%) than in the control group (61.3%) ( P < .001). After HTO, the medial ratio decreased significantly to 75.1% ( P = .035 in comparison with preoperative values) and was significantly correlated with the hip-knee-ankle angle in both groups: control ( r = −0.551; P = .033) and OA ( r = −0.528; P = .043). The change in medial ratio after HTO was significantly correlated with the change in hip-knee-ankle angle ( r = 0.587; P = .035). In the medial compartment, the HDA in the most lateral region of 4 subregions increased after HTO, but that in 3 medial subregions decreased. Conclusion: In this exploratory study, HTO shifted the HDA of the medial compartment of the proximal tibial articular surface toward the lateral compartment. In contrast, the HDA of the most lateral region of the medial compartment increased after HTO. This change in subchondral bone density may result from the change in stress distribution.

No difference of survival between cruciate retaining and substitution designs in high flexion total knee arthroplasty

The aim of this study was to compare the long-term implant survival and outcomes in patients with high-flexion cruciate-retaining (CR) or high-flexion posterior cruciate-substituting (PS) knee implants. A total of 253 knees (CR group: 159 vs. PS group: 94) were available for examination over a mean follow-up of 10 years. Clinical outcomes were assessed including the Hospital for Special Surgery score, Knee Society score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score at the final follow-up. Radiologic measurements were also assessed including the hip-knee-ankle angle and radiolucent lines according to the KSS system at the final follow-up. The survival rate was analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method. At the final follow-up, the mean total HSS scores were similar between the two groups (p = 0.970). The mean hip-knee-ankle angle at the final follow-up was similar between groups (p = 0.601). The 10- and 15-year survival rates were 95.4% and 93.3% in the CR group and 92.7% and 90.9% in the PS group, respectively, with no significant difference. Similar clinical and radiographic outcomes could be achieved with both the high-flexion CR and high-flexion PS total knee designs without a difference in survival rate after a 10-year follow-up.

Mild to Moderate Varus Alignment in Relation to Surgical Repair of a Medial Meniscus Root Tear: A Matched-Cohort Controlled Study With 2 Years of Follow-up

Background: Increased varus alignment of the lower extremity is known to be a poor prognostic factor for the surgical repair for a medial meniscus root tear (MMRT). However, given the concept of constitutional varus, which is present in a substantial portion of the normal population, the generally accepted surgical indication for MMRT concerning a varus alignment of 5° may be unnecessarily narrow. Purpose: To compare the surgical outcomes of arthroscopic transtibial pullout repair of MMRT according to the degree of varus alignment of the lower extremity. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3 Methods: Patients who underwent isolated arthroscopic transtibial pullout repair of MMRT between January 2010 and July 2017 at one institution and had a minimum follow-up of 2 years were included in this study. Patients were classified into 1 of 2 groups: the experimental group (n = 22) included patients with a preoperative hip-knee-ankle angle between 5° and 10° varus (mild to moderate varus alignment) and the control group (n = 51) included those with a preoperative hip-knee-ankle angle <5° varus (neutral alignment). Clinical scores and radiographic parameters were compared between the groups to assess surgical outcomes, which were statistically matched for potential confounders (age, body mass index, the severity of cartilage lesion) by use of the inverse probability of treatment weighting. A noninferiority trial was performed comparing the experimental and control groups in terms of subjective outcomes (International Knee Documentation Committee subjective and Lysholm scores) and objective outcomes (postoperative medial meniscal extrusion and the rate of osteoarthritis progression). Results: There were no statistically significant differences in surgical outcomes between the groups in subjective and objective aspects, which were consistent before and after inverse probability of treatment weighting. Apart from the clinical improvement observed in both groups, overall degenerative changes in the knee were found, although progression rates did not differ between the groups. In terms of the noninferiority trial, the overall surgical outcomes in the experimental group were not inferior to those in the control group. Conclusion: The short-term surgical outcomes of arthroscopic transtibial pullout repair for MMRT of patients with mild to moderate varus alignment were not inferior to but rather comparable with those with neutral alignment in terms of subjective and objective aspects. Therefore, it would be inappropriate to exclude patients with a diagnosis of MMRT from being indicated for the surgery simply because of mild to moderate varus alignment.