representation theorems
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

396
(FIVE YEARS 40)

H-INDEX

24
(FIVE YEARS 2)

Author(s):  
Yang Zheng ◽  
Giovanni Fantuzzi

AbstractWe prove decomposition theorems for sparse positive (semi)definite polynomial matrices that can be viewed as sparsity-exploiting versions of the Hilbert–Artin, Reznick, Putinar, and Putinar–Vasilescu Positivstellensätze. First, we establish that a polynomial matrix P(x) with chordal sparsity is positive semidefinite for all $$x\in \mathbb {R}^n$$ x ∈ R n if and only if there exists a sum-of-squares (SOS) polynomial $$\sigma (x)$$ σ ( x ) such that $$\sigma P$$ σ P is a sum of sparse SOS matrices. Second, we show that setting $$\sigma (x)=(x_1^2 + \cdots + x_n^2)^\nu $$ σ ( x ) = ( x 1 2 + ⋯ + x n 2 ) ν for some integer $$\nu $$ ν suffices if P is homogeneous and positive definite globally. Third, we prove that if P is positive definite on a compact semialgebraic set $$\mathcal {K}=\{x:g_1(x)\ge 0,\ldots ,g_m(x)\ge 0\}$$ K = { x : g 1 ( x ) ≥ 0 , … , g m ( x ) ≥ 0 } satisfying the Archimedean condition, then $$P(x) = S_0(x) + g_1(x)S_1(x) + \cdots + g_m(x)S_m(x)$$ P ( x ) = S 0 ( x ) + g 1 ( x ) S 1 ( x ) + ⋯ + g m ( x ) S m ( x ) for matrices $$S_i(x)$$ S i ( x ) that are sums of sparse SOS matrices. Finally, if $$\mathcal {K}$$ K is not compact or does not satisfy the Archimedean condition, we obtain a similar decomposition for $$(x_1^2 + \cdots + x_n^2)^\nu P(x)$$ ( x 1 2 + ⋯ + x n 2 ) ν P ( x ) with some integer $$\nu \ge 0$$ ν ≥ 0 when P and $$g_1,\ldots ,g_m$$ g 1 , … , g m are homogeneous of even degree. Using these results, we find sparse SOS representation theorems for polynomials that are quadratic and correlatively sparse in a subset of variables, and we construct new convergent hierarchies of sparsity-exploiting SOS reformulations for convex optimization problems with large and sparse polynomial matrix inequalities. Numerical examples demonstrate that these hierarchies can have a significantly lower computational complexity than traditional ones.


Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (20) ◽  
pp. 6503
Author(s):  
Andrzej Karbowski

The paper presents the Generalized Benders Decomposition (GBD) method, which is now one of the basic approaches to solve big mixed-integer nonlinear optimization problems. It concentrates on the basic formulation with convex objectives and constraints functions. Apart from the classical projection and representation theorems, a unified formulation of the master problem with nonlinear and linear cuts will be given. For the latter case the most effective and, at the same time, easy to implement computational algorithms will be pointed out.


Author(s):  
Alessia Caponera

AbstractIn this paper, we focus on isotropic and stationary sphere-cross-time random fields. We first introduce the class of spherical functional autoregressive-moving average processes (SPHARMA), which extend in a natural way the spherical functional autoregressions (SPHAR) recently studied in Caponera and Marinucci (Ann Stat 49(1):346–369, 2021) and Caponera et al. (Stoch Process Appl 137:167–199, 2021); more importantly, we then show that SPHAR and SPHARMA processes of sufficiently large order can be exploited to approximate every isotropic and stationary sphere-cross-time random field, thus generalizing to this infinite-dimensional framework some classical results on real-valued stationary processes. Further characterizations in terms of functional spectral representation theorems and Wold-like decompositions are also established.


Author(s):  
Cecilia Segura

In [Tense operators on De Morgan algebras, Log. J. IGPL 22(2) (2014) 255–267], Figallo and Pelaitay introduced the notion of tense operators on De Morgan algebras. Also, other notions of tense operators on De Morgan algebras were given by Chajda and Paseka in [De Morgan algebras with tense operators, J. Mult.-Valued Logic Soft Comput. 1 (2017) 29–45; The Poset-based logics for the De Morgan negation and set representation of partial dynamic De Morgan algebras, J. Mult.-Valued Logic Soft Comput. 31(3) (2018) 213–237; Set representation of partial dynamic De Morgan algebras, in 2016 IEEE 46th Int. Symp. Multiple-Valued Logic (IEEE Computer Society, 2016), pp. 119–124]. In this paper, we introduce a new notion of tense operators on De Morgan algebras and define the class of tense De Morgan [Formula: see text]-algebras. The main purpose of this paper is to give a discrete duality for tense De Morgan [Formula: see text]-algebras. To do this, we will extend the discrete duality given in [W. Dzik, E. Orłowska and C. van Alten, Relational Representation Theorems for Lattices with Negations: A Survey, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (2006), pp. 245–266], for De Morgan algebras.


Synthese ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anandi Hattiangadi ◽  
H. Orri Stefánsson

AbstractThis paper takes issue with an influential interpretationist argument for physicalism about intentionality based on the possibility of radical interpretation. The interpretationist defends the physicalist thesis that the intentional truths supervene on the physical truths by arguing that it is possible for a radical interpreter, who knows all of the physical truths, to work out the intentional truths about what an arbitrary agent believes, desires, and means without recourse to any further empirical information. One of the most compelling arguments for the possibility of radical interpretation, associated most closely with David Lewis and Donald Davidson, gives a central role to decision theoretic representation theorems, which demonstrate that if an agent’s preferences satisfy certain constraints, it is possible to deduce probability and utility functions that represent her beliefs and desires. We argue that an interpretationist who wants to rely on existing representation theorems in defence of the possibility of radical interpretation faces a trilemma, each horn of which is incompatible with the possibility of radical interpretation.


Econometrica ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 89 (5) ◽  
pp. 2081-2116
Author(s):  
Alexander M. Jakobsen

A sender ranks information structures knowing that a receiver processes the information before choosing an action affecting them both. The sender and receiver may differ in their utility functions and/or prior beliefs, yielding a model of dynamic inconsistency when they represent the same individual at two points in time. I take as primitive (i) a collection of preference orderings over all information structures, indexed by menus of acts (the sender's ex ante preferences for information), and (ii) a collection of correspondences over menus of acts, indexed by signals (the receiver's signal‐contingent choice(s) from menus). I provide axiomatic representation theorems characterizing the sender as a sophisticated planner and the receiver as a Bayesian information processor, and show that all parameters can be uniquely identified from the sender's preferences for information. I also establish a series of results characterizing common priors, common utility functions, and intuitive measures of disagreement for these parameters—all in terms of the sender's preferences for information.


Author(s):  
Louis Narens ◽  
Brian Skyrms

Utilitarianism began as a movement for social reform that changed the world. To understand Utilitarianism, we must understand utility – how is it to be measured, and how aggregate utility of a group can be understood. The authors, a cognitive scientist and a philosopher, pursue these questions from Bentham to the present, examining psychophysics, positivism, measurement theory, meaningfulness, neuropsychology, representation theorems, and dynamics of formation of conventions.


2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 189-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jay Simon ◽  
Donald Saari ◽  
L. Robin Keller

Altruistic preferences or the desire to improve the well‐being of others even at one’s own expense can be difficult to incorporate into traditional value and utility models. It is straightforward to construct a multiattribute preference structure for one decision maker that includes the outcomes experienced by others. However, when multiple individuals incorporate one another’s well‐being into their decision making, this creates complex interdependencies that must be resolved before the preference models can be applied. We provide representation theorems for additive altruistic value functions for two-person, n-person, and group outcomes in which multiple individuals are altruistic. We find that in most cases it is possible to resolve the preference interdependencies and that modeling the preferences of altruistic individuals and groups is tractable.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document