premature chromosome condensation
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

224
(FIVE YEARS 14)

H-INDEX

31
(FIVE YEARS 2)

eLife ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Houlard ◽  
Erin E Cutts ◽  
Muhammad S Shamim ◽  
Jonathan Godwin ◽  
David Weisz ◽  
...  

The dramatic change in morphology of chromosomal DNAs between interphase and mitosis is one of the defining features of the eukaryotic cell cycle. Two types of enzymes, namely cohesin and condensin confer the topology of chromosomal DNA by extruding DNA loops. While condensin normally configures chromosomes exclusively during mitosis, cohesin does so during interphase. The processivity of cohesin’s loop extrusion during interphase is limited by a regulatory factor called WAPL, which induces cohesin to dissociate from chromosomes via a mechanism that requires dissociation of its kleisin from the neck of SMC3. We show here that a related mechanism may be responsible for blocking condensin II from acting during interphase. Cells derived from patients affected by microcephaly caused by mutations in the MCPH1 gene undergo premature chromosome condensation but it has never been established for certain whether MCPH1 regulates condensin II directly. We show that deletion of Mcph1 in mouse embryonic stem cells unleashes an activity of condensin II that triggers formation of compact chromosomes in G1 and G2 phases, which is accompanied by enhanced mixing of A and B chromatin compartments, and that this occurs even in the absence of CDK1 activity. Crucially, inhibition of condensin II by MCPH1 depends on the binding of a short linear motif within MCPH1 to condensin II's NCAPG2 subunit. We show that the activities of both Cohesin and Condensin II may be restricted during interphase by similar types of mechanisms as MCPH1's ability to block condensin II's association with chromatin is abrogated by the fusion of SMC2 with NCAPH2. Remarkably, in the absence of both WAPL and MCPH1, cohesin and condensin II transform chromosomal DNAs of G2 cells into chromosomes with a solenoidal axis showing that both cohesin and condensin must be tightly regulated to adjust the structure of chromatids for their successful segregation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Usha Yadav ◽  
Nagesh N. Bhat ◽  
Kapil B. Shirsaath ◽  
Utkarsha S. Mungse ◽  
Balvinder K. Sapra

AbstractMitotic cell fusion induced Premature Chromosome Condensation (G0-PCC) assay in human lymphocytes allows rapid detection of cytogenetic damage in interphase stage, within few hours after blood collection. Hence, it is the most suitable method for rapid and high dose biodosimetry. Mitotic cells, used for G0-PCC could be either freshly isolated or previously cryo-preserved. However, under emergency scenarios, only cryo-preserved cells can be relied upon, fresh isolation will only delay the process by 18–24 h. Impact of cryopreservation on mitotic cells and their efficacy to induce PCC are not reported. In the present study, we investigated effect of cryopreservation on mitotic cells and refined the parameters for G0-PCC. More than 95% of the cells were recoverable after 4 months of cryopreservation, within 20 min recovery at 37 °C, without significant change in the mitotic index or viability. Recovered mitotic cells have shown mitotic index of 89 ± 4% and viability of 90 ± 4%, similar to that of freshly isolated cells. Decrease in metaphases was observed within 40 min after recovery as the mitotic cells progressed through cell cycle and reduced to 21% at 1.5 h. Nevertheless, in presence of Colcemid, the cells progressed slowly and considerably high metaphase index (60%) persisted up to ~ 2 h. The recovered cells efficiently fused with lymphocytes and induced PCC. Average PCC index varied from 10 to 20%, which did not change with cryopreservation duration. Post fusion incubation duration of 2 h was found to be optimum for proper chromosome condensation. In conclusion, use of cryo-preserved mitotic cells is the most practical approach for rapid biodosimetry. The cells can be recovered quickly and efficiently without alteration in viability or mitotic index. Recovered cells are fully competent to induce G0-PCC.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Chatron ◽  
Giuliana Giannuzzi ◽  
Pierre-Antoine Rollat-Farnier ◽  
Flavie Diguet ◽  
Eleonora Porcu ◽  
...  

AbstractThe rise of pangenomic molecular assays allowed uncovering complex rearrangements named chromoanagenesis that were hypothesized to result from catastrophic shattering events. Constitutional cases have typically been reported individually preventing identification of common features and uncovering the mechanisms at play. We characterized 20 new chromoanagenesis and discovered yet undescribed features. While literature differentiates chromothripsis and its shattering event repaired through non-homologous end joining from chromoanasynthesis born to aberrant replicative processes, we identified shattered chromosomes repaired through a combination of mechanisms. In particular, three samples present with “rearrangement hubs” comprising a fragmented kilobase-long sequence threaded throughout the rearrangement.To assess the mechanisms at play, we merged our data with those of 20 published constitutional complex chromosomal rearrangement cases. We evaluated if the distribution of their 1032 combined breakpoints was distinctive using bootstrap simulations and found that breakpoints tend to keep away from haplosensitive genes suggesting selective pressure. We then compared their distribution with that of 13,310 and 468 breakpoints of cancer complex chromosomal rearrangements and constitutional simple rearrangement samples, respectively. Both complex rearrangement groups showed breakpoint enrichment in late replicating regions suggesting similar origins for constitutional and cancer cases. Simple rearrangement breakpoints but not complex ones were depleted from lamina-associated domains (LADs), possibly as a consequence of reduced mobility of DNA ends bound to lamina.The enrichment of breakpoints in late-replicating chromatin for both constitutional and cancer chromoanagenesis provides an orthogonal support to the premature chromosome condensation hypothesis that was put forward to explain chromoanagenesis.


2020 ◽  
Vol 137 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-28
Author(s):  
A. Panek ◽  
J. Miszczyk ◽  
C. Paluszkiewicz ◽  
E. Pyszka ◽  
I. Milcewicz-Mika ◽  
...  

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 1123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pantelias ◽  
Karachristou ◽  
Georgakilas ◽  
Terzoudi

The discovery of chromothripsis in cancer genomes challenges the long-standing concept of carcinogenesis as the result of progressive genetic events. Despite recent advances in describing chromothripsis, its mechanistic origin remains elusive. The prevailing conception is that it arises from a massive accumulation of fragmented DNA inside micronuclei (MN), whose defective nuclear envelope ruptures or leads to aberrant DNA replication, before main nuclei enter mitosis. An alternative hypothesis is that the premature chromosome condensation (PCC) dynamics in asynchronous micronucleated cells underlie chromosome shattering in a single catastrophic event, a hallmark of chromothripsis. Specifically, when main nuclei enter mitosis, premature chromatin condensation provokes the shattering of chromosomes entrapped inside MN, if they are still undergoing DNA replication. To test this hypothesis, the agent RO-3306, a selective ATP-competitive inhibitor of CDK1 that promotes cell cycle arrest at the G2/M boundary, was used in this study to control the degree of cell cycle asynchrony between main nuclei and MN. By delaying the entrance of main nuclei into mitosis, additional time was allowed for the completion of DNA replication and duplication of chromosomes inside MN. We performed interphase cytogenetic analysis using asynchronous micronucleated cells generated by exposure of human lymphocytes to γ-rays, and heterophasic multinucleated Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells generated by cell fusion procedures. Our results demonstrate that the PCC dynamics during asynchronous mitosis in micronucleated or multinucleated cells are an important determinant of chromosome shattering and may underlie the mechanistic origin of chromothripsis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document