Phosphate Deprivation Can Impair Mechano-Stimulated Cytosolic Free Calcium Elevation in Arabidopsis Roots

The root tip responds to mechanical stimulation with a transient increase in cytosolic free calcium as a possible second messenger. Although the root tip will grow through a heterogeneous soil nutrient supply, little is known of the consequence of nutrient deprivation for such signalling. Here, the effect of inorganic phosphate deprivation on the root’s mechano-stimulated cytosolic free calcium increase is investigated. Arabidopsisthaliana (cytosolically expressing aequorin as a bioluminescent free calcium reporter) is grown in zero or full phosphate conditions, then roots or root tips are mechanically stimulated. Plants also are grown vertically on a solid medium so their root skewing angle (deviation from vertical) can be determined as an output of mechanical stimulation. Phosphate starvation results in significantly impaired cytosolic free calcium elevation in both root tips and whole excised roots. Phosphate-starved roots sustain a significantly lower root skewing angle than phosphate-replete roots. These results suggest that phosphate starvation causes a dampening of the root mechano-signalling system that could have consequences for growth in hardened, compacted soils.

Calmodulin-Mediated Regulation of Gap Junction Channels

Evidence that neighboring cells uncouple from each other as one dies surfaced in the late 19th century, but it took almost a century for scientists to start understanding the uncoupling mechanism (chemical gating). The role of cytosolic free calcium (Ca2+i) in cell–cell channel gating was first reported in the mid-sixties. In these studies, only micromolar [Ca2+]i were believed to affect gating—concentrations reachable only in cell death, which would discard Ca2+i as a fine modulator of cell coupling. More recently, however, numerous researchers, including us, have reported the effectiveness of nanomolar [Ca2+]i. Since connexins do not have high-affinity calcium sites, the effectiveness of nanomolar [Ca2+]i suggests the role of Ca-modulated proteins, with calmodulin (CaM) being most obvious. Indeed, in 1981 we first reported that a CaM-inhibitor prevents chemical gating. Since then, the CaM role in gating has been confirmed by studies that tested it with a variety of approaches such as treatments with CaM-inhibitors, inhibition of CaM expression, expression of CaM mutants, immunofluorescent co-localization of CaM and gap junctions, and binding of CaM to peptides mimicking connexin domains identified as CaM targets. Our gating model envisions Ca2+-CaM to directly gate the channels by acting as a plug (“Cork” gating model), and probably also by affecting connexin conformation.