Abstract
Landslides are one of the most destructive natural phenomena in the world, which occur mostly in mountainous areas and cause damage to the economic sectors, agricultural lands, residential areas and infrastructures of any country, and also threaten the lives and property of human beings. Therefore, landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) can play a critical role in identifying prone areas and reducing the damage caused by landslides in each area. In the present study, deep learning algorithms including convolutional neural network (CNN) and long short-term memory (LSTM) were used to identify landslide prone areas in Ardabil province, Iran. Equql to 312 landslide locations were identified and randomly divided into train and test datasets at 70–30% ratios. Then, according to previous studies and environmental conditions in the study area, twelve factors affecting the occurrence of landslides were selected, namely altitude, slope angle, slope aspect, topographic wetness index (TWI), profile curvature, plan curvature, land-use, lithology, distance to faults, distance to rivers, distance to roads, and rainfall. The ratio of the importance of each influential factor in landslide occurrence was obtained through information gain ranking filter (IGRF) method and it was found that land-use and profile curvature had the highest and lowest impacts, respectively. Afterwards, LSMs were generated using CNN and LSTM algorithms. In the next step, the performance of the models was evaluated based on the area under curve (AUC) value of receiver operating characteristics curve and the root mean square error (RMSE) method. The AUC values for CNN and LSTM models were 0.821 and 0.832, respectively. Furthermore, the RMSE values in the CNN model for each of the training and testing dataset were 0.121 and 0.132, respectively. The RMSE values in the LSTM model for each of the training and testing dataset were 0.185 and 0.188, respectively. Therefore, it can be concluded that CNN performance is slightly better than LSTM; but in general, both models have close performance and the accuracy of both models is acceptable.