How we imagine our place within the structure of sociotechnical-human
relationships—specifically, in domains of life affected by data-analytics and the
probabilistic bets institutions and people in power make on the future of our credit
worthiness, political leanings, shopping habits etc.—is our “algorithmic imagination.” The
purpose of this panel is to explore the “algorithmic imagination” as it manifests in
particular scholarly, historical, socio-cultural, and technical contexts. The panelists
prioritize how social actors, situated in distinct settings, go about constructing an
“algorithmic imagination” in conversation/opposition with how computational systems have
“imagined” them; they will also reflect critically and self-reflexively on the implications
of an algorithmic imagination, so conceived. Collectively, the panelists demure from
monolithic understandings of the “algorithmic imagination” while also embracing algorithmic
intersectionality. The primary contention of this panel is that the ways in which algorithms
have been “thought,” or imagined, have made it difficult to conceive of practicable
strategies for transforming algorithmic cultures and, indeed, for delinking them from both
state and corporate control. The panel, thus, makes three primary contributions. First, we
situate, define, and distinguish the concept, “algorithmic imagination.” Second, the panel
provides analyses of key facets of the algorithmic imagination, in specific historical
settings and life-worlds defined by intersectionality. Lastly, it aims to contribute,
however provisionally, to a political theory that recognizes the deterministic power of
computational systems but rejects the notion that power is inherently democratic or
monolithically insurmountable.