development paradigm
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

625
(FIVE YEARS 217)

H-INDEX

24
(FIVE YEARS 4)

Author(s):  
M. O. Kvitko ◽  
V. M. Savosko

The main purpose of this work was to consider artificial tree plantations in terms of ecosystem approach, as a significant factor in improving the ecological environment for the introduction of the sustainable development paradigm in the conditions of industrial pollution Kryvyi Rih region. During 2015–2020, natural forest ecosystems and artificial forest plantations were studied by classical methods. These woody plantations are located in contrasting ecological conditions. The relevance of our research is determined by the need to find practical measures aimed at the formation and maintenance of woody plantations to increase resistance to areas under industrial pollution. The solution to this problem was carried out by assessing their living conditions and biometric indicators.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 785-802
Author(s):  
Alla Yu. Borzova ◽  
Arkadiy A. Eremin ◽  
Natalia V. Ivkina ◽  
Oleg K. Petrovich-Belkin

The article considers cooperation patterns between the European Union (EU) and CELAC (Community of Latin America and the Caribbean) in the context of creatively applying this experience to a broader topic of Russia - Latin America multilevel cooperation. The concept of sustainable development, which implies interaction in accordance with its three main dimensions: environmental, social and economic, is adopted on the global level. The interaction between EU and CELAC contributes to the progress in achieving the goals of sustainable development, where a lot of attention is paid to the green economy, alternative energy, and social aspects, since the environmental aspects constraints are providing the most significant impetus to structural changes in the existing development paradigm. This in return is expected to create a model that ensures economic growth based on a green economy, alternative energy, with greater equality and social inclusiveness. At supranational level in the European Union an effective and systemic policy has been formed in the field of nature conservation and combating climate change, which without a doubt can be considered one of the most progressive ones in the world, which creates potential for sharing these experiences with less developed and fortunate nations. European programs for Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) countries have become an important factor in the development of interregional cooperation in environmental protection, biodiversity conservation, and countering natural disasters. The article also focuses on the most recent changes that have occurred in the sphere of interaction between CELAC and EU in the context of COVID-19 pandemic. Massive structural and conceptual changes that have seriously reshaped the priorities and funding of joint programmers between two organizations reflects new priorities for sustainable development in general when it comes to new world realities in post-pandemic world, and could be useful for Russian model for the relations with this region.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 51-56
Author(s):  
Michał Borowy

Purpose of the study: This study intended to do an assessment of the bioeconomy paradigm importance for companies’ innovation in the SMEs sector. Methodology: The research material was collected on the basis of desk research method using professional literature, including book publications, scientific articles, presentations, reports, as well as various legal acts and press sources in paper and electronic form. Case studies of selected companies were prepared on the basis of the European Commission report. Main Findings: The concept of knowledge-based bioeconomy has become an important factor determining the innovation of enterprises. In the face of global eco-threats, companies that implement strategies in areas convergent with the new development paradigm are increasingly using innovative biotechnologies in their manufacturing processes or replacing non-renewable production resources with biodegradable bio-materials. In the process of changes, an important role is played by small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), whose activities are to fill the gap between scientific research and the implementation of innovation, especially in such areas as food, agriculture and fisheries, and biotechnology. Therefore, despite numerous implementation barriers, this sector has gained a new source of competitive advantages thanks to the bioeconomy. Applications of this study: The presented material may become a source of knowledge for entrepreneurs interested in developing activities in the area of bioeconomy and for institutions focused on creating innovation support programs for the SMEs sector. The originality of this study: In the literature the bioeconomy is considered mainly as the sustainable production of renewable resources and the possibility of their transformation into food, feed, bio-based products or bioenergy. The new development paradigm should therefore be considered as a valuable source of competitive advantages for enterprises. This study documented its importance as a factor stimulating the innovation activity of small and medium-sized enterprises. This phenomenon is particularly important from the point of view of the Polish SMEs sector, whose innovations are most often of an imitative nature.


Author(s):  
С.В. Беспалый

При разработке «Повестки дня в области устойчивого развития на период до 2030 года» международное сообщество осознало, что для решения проблемы глобальной нищеты необходима новая парадигма развития. В статье показано, что, расширяя прежний уровень участия в универсальной, трансформирующей и интегрированной повестке дня, применяются новые подходы для ускорения прогресса, отражается взаимосвязь современных экономик, отраслей, обществ и природной среды, а также признается важность инклюзивного и устойчивого промышленного развития для искоренения нищеты. Достижение устойчивого промышленного развития затрудняется компромиссами в пользу экономического роста, что может повлиять на цели в области устойчивого развития, принятые государствами-членами ООН. В этом контексте в статье рассматривается вопрос: что означает инклюзивное и устойчивое промышленное развитие и в какой степени оно влияет при разработке стратегий развития государства? В статье делается вывод о том, что инклюзивный и устойчивый, экономический, промышленный рост может содействовать улучшению жизни населения развивающихся государств. Индустриализация государства и технологическая модернизация промышленного комплекса должна положительно влиять на благосостояние людей и организаций. In developing the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, the international community realized that a new development paradigm was needed to tackle global poverty. The article shows that expanding the previous level of participation in the resulting universal, transforming and integrated agenda, new approaches are used to accelerate progress, the interconnectedness of today's economies, industries, societies and the environment is reflected, and the importance of inclusive and sustainable industrial development for eradication is recognized poverty. Achieving sustainable industrial development is hampered by trade-offs in favor of economic growth, which may affect the sustainable development goals adopted by UN member states. In this context, the article considers the question: what does inclusive and sustainable industrial development mean and to what extent does it influence the development of state development strategies. The article concludes that inclusive and sustainable economic, industrial growth can contribute to improving the lives of people in developing countries. Industrialization of the state and technological modernization of the industrial complex should positively affect the well-being of people and organizations.


Author(s):  
Emily L Mofield ◽  
William EA Mofield

In this article, we examine conceptions of giftedness through a Christian perspective and through a talent development paradigm ( Subotnik et al., 2011 ). We intersect aims of Christian education with a developmental view of giftedness in order to inform pedagogical approaches in educating gifted/high-potential students. In applying the characteristics of Christian pedagogy of uniqueness, purpose, stewardship, and Christian character, teachers of the gifted can create contexts for students to explore authentic learning experiences in ways that develop specific strengths and talents for kingdom purposes.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 141-145
Author(s):  
Aleksandr Suglobov ◽  
Oleg Karpovich

The “Green Deal” of the European Union (EU) is a plan for decarbonizing the EU economy by 2050, structural changes in the European energy system, transforming the economy and stimulating efforts to combat climate change. But this new development paradigm will also have profound geopolitical consequences. This initiative will have a significant impact on changing the energy balance of the EU and global markets, on the countries exporting energy resources. European energy security will be exposed to new challenges and threats, which is likely to have a negative impact on the economy of a wide range of states.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-22
Author(s):  
Yusuf Sayed ◽  
Adam Cooper ◽  
Vaughn M. John

COVID-19 has illuminated and exacerbated inequities, yet, as a crisis, it is not exceptional in its effect on education. We start this critical essay by situating the crisis in its historical, economic, and political contexts, illustrating how crisis and violence intersect as structural conditions of late modernity, capitalism, and their education systems. Situating the current crisis contextually lays the foundation to analyse how it has been interpreted through three sets of policy imaginaries, characterised by the notions of learning loss and building back better and by solutions primarily based on techno-education. These concepts reflect and are reflective of the international aid and development paradigm during the pandemic. Building on this analysis, we present, in the final section, an alternative radical vision that calls on a sociology of possibilities and pedagogies of hope that we see to be central to a new people-centred education imaginary to disrupt current inequalities and provide a new way of doing rather than a return to a business-as-usual approach in and through education.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Tazia Gaisford

<p>This study is a response to calls for alternatives to development by postdevelopment authors and critics of post-development alike. It asks “can the praxis of permaculture and anarchism provide an alternative to development?” Although alternatives to development arguably do not exist untouched by the dominant development paradigm, it is possible to imagine and to create the different possible organisations based on principles of mutual aid, direct action and self-management. Anarchism as a politically focused social philosophy and permaculture as an ecologically focused design philosophy are mutually beneficial in strengthening each other. The combined analysis of alternatives to development uses case studies in the Wellington Region, primarily Climate Camp Aotearoa, with permaculture and anarchist principles, and contributes another perspective to the post-development debate. The two approaches share converging central ethics, principles and struggles of praxis. They recognise that transformative change is necessary. Whether it is called a cultural revolution, transition or paradigm shift, the underlying recognition is that we need to live more harmoniously with each other and the natural environment by creating diverse post-industrial societies. Many tools, principles and processes advocated by alternative development and post-development are the same. However, the combination of those tools, principles and processes, and how they are designed and applied in relation to each other systemically, are significant in determining whether or not the intent is that of an alternative to development. Solidarity and stewardship, decentralisation and autonomy, tight multiple feedback mechanisms and a whole system design approach are some of the alternative people-focused solutions proposed by anarchism and permaculture. Fieldwork research was conducted using the qualitative ethnographic and action research methods of participant observation from a constructionist and post-development perspective. Global justice networks are given importance as examples of the anarchistic intent of alternatives to development.</p>


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Tazia Gaisford

<p>This study is a response to calls for alternatives to development by postdevelopment authors and critics of post-development alike. It asks “can the praxis of permaculture and anarchism provide an alternative to development?” Although alternatives to development arguably do not exist untouched by the dominant development paradigm, it is possible to imagine and to create the different possible organisations based on principles of mutual aid, direct action and self-management. Anarchism as a politically focused social philosophy and permaculture as an ecologically focused design philosophy are mutually beneficial in strengthening each other. The combined analysis of alternatives to development uses case studies in the Wellington Region, primarily Climate Camp Aotearoa, with permaculture and anarchist principles, and contributes another perspective to the post-development debate. The two approaches share converging central ethics, principles and struggles of praxis. They recognise that transformative change is necessary. Whether it is called a cultural revolution, transition or paradigm shift, the underlying recognition is that we need to live more harmoniously with each other and the natural environment by creating diverse post-industrial societies. Many tools, principles and processes advocated by alternative development and post-development are the same. However, the combination of those tools, principles and processes, and how they are designed and applied in relation to each other systemically, are significant in determining whether or not the intent is that of an alternative to development. Solidarity and stewardship, decentralisation and autonomy, tight multiple feedback mechanisms and a whole system design approach are some of the alternative people-focused solutions proposed by anarchism and permaculture. Fieldwork research was conducted using the qualitative ethnographic and action research methods of participant observation from a constructionist and post-development perspective. Global justice networks are given importance as examples of the anarchistic intent of alternatives to development.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document