mechanical ventilation weaning
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

80
(FIVE YEARS 27)

H-INDEX

9
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-115
Author(s):  
Ganes Irawati Hardjono ◽  
Chatarina Setya Widyastuti ◽  
Fransisca Anjar Rina

Background: Mechanical ventilation weaningis a collaborative action of multidisciplines. The nurse's knowledge plays an important role in assessing the readiness of the patient and observing it during the weaning process to support the success of the patient escaping from mechanical ventilation.   Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the factors related to the knowledge of nurses about mechanical ventilation weaning in the Intensive Care Room at Panti Rapih Hospital.   Methods:This research is adescriptive analytic study with a cross sectional approach. The population of this study were all nurses who worked in the Intensive Care Room at Panti Rapih Hospital, Yogyakarta. The sample in this study was the total population, namely nurses in the Intensive Care Room, amounting to 48 respondents. The research instrument was avalid and reliable questionnaire on the level of knpwledge and influencing factors with a calculated r value of morethan 0.482 and cronbach alpha 0.75. Analysis using independent T-test and Spearman   Results: The mean level of knowledge of respondents about mechanical ventilation weaning averaged 31.52 with CI7.458. Factors related to mechanical ventilation weaning knowledgein this studywereage (p-value:0.024), education (p-value:0.000), experience (p-value: 0.003), social and cultural (p-value: 0.009).), and sources of information (p-value:0.001). Meanwhile, the factors that were not related to knowledge of mechanical ventilation in this study were environment (p-value:0.115) and economy (p-value:0.231).


QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hisham A Awad ◽  
Soha M Khafagy ◽  
Nivan T Ahmed ◽  
Basma M Shehata ◽  
Ayah M Shabana

Abstract Background Timing is crucial when deciding if a patient can be successfully extubated. Both premature discontinuation and unnecessary delay of mechanical ventilation weaning have been associated with poor outcome. There are no enough guidelines for the assessment of readiness of newborns for extubation. The degree of lung aeration loss in different clinical conditions can be quantified via lung ultrasound (LUS). Objectives To evaluate the lung ultrasound score as a follow up tool in ventilated neonates and its validity as predictor of extubation. Subjects and Methods Prospective study done on 39 mechanically ventilated neonates 27-42 weeks’ gestation. Lung ultrasound was done daily for each patient till the day of weaning and lung ultrasound (LUS) score was calculated. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to trial of weaning; Success “S” group: in which weaning succeeded and Failure “F” group: in which weaning failed. Results The “F” group had significantly higher LUS score at time of intubation, pre- extubation and post-extubation compared with the “S” group (P- value= 0.002, 0.003 and 0.001 respectively). A cut off value of ≤ 10 for LUS score pre-extubation predict successful weaning with sensitivity 76% and specificity 64.3%. Conclusion LUS is an indicator for lung aeration and can be used as a tool to predict success of weaning of ventilated neonates.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-11
Author(s):  
Mohammad Omar Faruq ◽  
ASM Areef Ahsan ◽  
Kaniz Fatema ◽  
Fatema Ahmed ◽  
Amina Sultana ◽  
...  

Objective : To determine mechanical ventilation discontinuation (weaning) practices in Bangladesh as there is currently no data available on this issue. Method : Analyzing the Survey on Bangladeshi respondents using questionnaire developed by and used by a pan Asian study where Bangladesh critical care physicians participated. Result : 40 physicians from 10 ICUs of Bangladesh participated. Majority of our participating doctors (62.5%) came from private for profit hospital. 19 out of 40 respondents were certified in critical care medicine. In our study spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) was liberally used with pressure support being used by 30% respondents. Most of the extubation trial took place during day. As criteria for extubation, respondents mainly considered consciousness and cooperation and along with gag reflex, cough strength, suction frequency and cuff leak at different times. Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) was commonly used for early extubation in cases of COPD, cardiogenic pulmonary edema, neuromuscular disorders, post-operative cases and obesity. Slightly less than half of respondents did not follow any sedation protocol and 42.5% followed weaning protocol. Protocolized weaning by nurses are not known to be practiced in Bangladesh. Conclusion : Weaning practices are diverse in Bangladeshi ICUs. Protoclized weaning is rarely practiced in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Crit Care J March 2021; 9(1): 4-11


2021 ◽  
pp. 019459982098478
Author(s):  
Daniel A. Benito ◽  
Daniel E. Bestourous ◽  
Jane Y. Tong ◽  
Luke J. Pasick ◽  
Robert T. Sataloff

Objectives A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to determine the cumulative incidences of decannulation and mechanical ventilation weaning in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who have undergone a tracheotomy. Weighted average mean times to tracheotomy, to decannulation, and to death were calculated from reported or approximated means. Data Sources PubMed, SCOPUS, CINAHL, and the Cochrane library. Review Methods Studies were screened by 3 investigators independently. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Studies including patients with COVID-19 who underwent a tracheotomy were identified. Studies without reported mechanical ventilation weaning or decannulation were excluded. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. Results After identifying 232 unique studies, 18 articles encompassing outcomes for 3234 patients were ultimately included for meta-analysis, with a weighted mean follow-up time of 28.6 ± 6.2 days after tracheotomy. Meta-analysis revealed that 55.0% of tracheotomized patients were weaned successfully from mechanical ventilation (95% CI, 47.4%-62.2%). Approximately 34.9% of patients were decannulated successfully, with a mean decannulation time of 18.6 ± 5.7 days after tracheotomy. The pooled mortality in tracheotomized patients with COVID-19 was 13.1%, with a mean time of death of 13.0 ± 4.0 days following tracheotomy. Conclusion At the current state of the coronavirus pandemic, over half of patients who have required tracheotomies are being weaned off of mechanical ventilation. While 13.1% patients have died prior to decannulation, over a third of all tracheotomized patients with COVID-19 reported in the literature have undergone successful decannulation.


2020 ◽  
pp. 175114372097154
Author(s):  
Timothy Felton ◽  
Natalie Pattison ◽  
Simon Fletcher ◽  
Simon Finney ◽  
Tim Walsh ◽  
...  

In 2013, a group of clinicians on behalf of the National Institute for Health Research, collaborated with ICU Steps to produce guidance about people being enrolled in more than one critical care trial. This is referred to as “co-enrolment” and can be where a person takes part in one study at the same time as another study (or one after the other in a short time-frame). For instance, being part of a study looking at sepsis drugs and a mechanical ventilation weaning study. The drivers for developing this guidance were a lack of any existing guidance, nationally and internationally, at that time, and a desire to ensure high quality research is conducted. The emphasis was on making trials as safe as possible for patients and ensuring robust trial outcomes. Critical care was seen to lead in this, with our exemplar guidance used across all health research. We wish to revisit this guidance now that there is more experience of coenrolment in critical care trials. There is also more awareness of different consent models, such as deferred consent (taking consent when a person is awake and able to give consent) and consultee consent (asking families or independent professionals to consent). Consenting to coenrolment is an important ethical consideration for the revision of this guidance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document