Correlation between activated clotting time monitoring and heparin concentration measurement in a patient with antiphospholipid syndrome during cardiac valve surgery: a case report

Background Anticoagulation management of patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) undergoing cardiac surgery is challenging due to the prolongation of activated clotting time (ACT). Currently, no study has compared the utility of ACT monitoring using the Hemochron Jr. Signature+ and that of heparin concentration management using the Hemostasis Management System (HMS) Plus in patients with APS. Case presentation A 71-year-old woman with APS was scheduled to undergo an aortic valve replacement for aortic regurgitation. The ACT was measured using the Hemochron Jr. Signature+, and the heparin concentration was measured concurrently using the HMS Plus. ACT over 480 s corresponded to an adequate heparin concentration during cardiopulmonary bypass. The clinical course was uneventful, and no thrombotic or hemorrhagic complications were observed. Conclusion In the present patient with APS, the Hemochron Jr. Signature+ was useful as an anticoagulation management during cardiac valve surgery.

Comparative analysis of heparin affecting the biochemical properties of chicken and murine prion proteins

The conversion of cellular prion protein (PrPC) to disease-provoking conformer (PrPSc) is crucial in the pathogenesis of prion diseases. Heparin has been shown to enhance mammalian prion protein misfolding. As spontaneous prion disease has not been reported in non-mammalian species, such as chicken, it is interesting to explore the influence of heparin on the conversion of chicken prion protein (ChPrP). Herein, we investigated the influences of heparin on biochemical properties of full-length recombinant ChPrP, with murine prion protein (MoPrP) as control. The results showed that at low heparin concentration (10 μg/mL), a great loss of solubility was observed for both MoPrP and ChPrP using solubility assays. In contrast, when the concentration of heparin was high (30 μg/mL), the solubility of MoPrP and ChPrP both decreased slightly. Using circular dichroism, PK digestion and transmission electron microscopy, significantly increased β-sheet content, PK resistance and size of aggregates were observed for MoPrP interacted with 30 μg/mL heparin, whereas 30 μg/mL heparin-treated ChPrP showed less PK resistance and slight increase of β-sheet structure. Therefore, heparin can induce conformational changes in both MoPrP and ChPrP and the biochemical properties of the aggregates induced by heparin could be modified by heparin concentration. These results highlight the importance of concentration of cofactors affecting PrP misfolding.

A New Method for the Measurement of International Normalized Ratio in Hemodialysis Patients with Heparin-Locked Tunneled Dialysis Catheters

Background. To measure International Normalized Ratio (INR) in hemodialysis patients with tunneled dialysis catheters (TDCs), blood sampling is frequently obtained via the catheter at the start of the session. INR measurements via finger-prick point of care testing (POCT) and via blood sampling taken from the dialysis circuit are evaluated as alternatives. Methods. In 14 hemodialysis patients with TDCs, treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKA), INR measurements via POCT were compared with plasma INR samples taken via the catheter at the start of dialysis and via the dialysis circuit after 30 and 60 minutes during 3 nonconsecutive dialysis sessions. Results. Blood samples taken at the start of dialysis at the catheter site were frequently contaminated with heparin originating from the locking solution (unfractionated heparin concentration (UFH) >1.0 IU/ml in 13.2%). POCT INR at the start of dialysis was not different from plasma INR after 30 and 60 minutes (Wilcoxon test p = 0.113 , n = 37, and p = 0.631 , n = 36, respectively). Moreover, there was no difference between POCT INR at the start of dialysis and POCT INR after 30 and 60 minutes (Wilcoxon test p = 0.797 and p = 0.801, respectively; n = 36). Passing and Bablok regression equation was used, y = 0.460 + 0.733x; n = 105. Treatment decisions based on these 2 methods showed a very good overall agreement (kappa = 0.810; 95% CI: 0.732–0.889; n = 105). Conclusions. Measuring plasma INR via the TDC at the start of dialysis should be abandoned. Measuring POCT INR via a finger prick at the start or even after 30 to 60 minutes is an alternative. The most elegant alternative is to take plasma INR samples via the dialysis circuit 30 minutes or later after the start of the dialysis.

Factors associated with errors in the heparin dose response test: recommendations to improve individualized heparin management in cardiopulmonary bypass

Background: A critical aspect of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is to achieve full anticoagulation to prevent thrombosis and consumptive coagulation without using excessive amount of heparin. This can be achieved with heparin dose response (HDR) test in vitro to calculate an individualized heparin bolus to reach a target activated clotting time (ACT) and heparin concentration. However, we often observe that the measured ACT (mACT) with the calculated heparin bolus gives significant errors, both positive (mACT is higher than expected) and negative (mACT is lower), from expected ACT (eACT). Methods: We performed a retrospective study of 250 patients who underwent cardiac surgery to attain an error distribution of the mACT from eACT with calculated heparin bolus. In addition, it is aimed to identify possible patterns of baseline ACT (bACT), calculated heparin concentration (CHC) and HDR slope that are associated with the significant positive and negative errors. Results: We found that individualized heparin bolus by HDR test is consistently underestimated while it gave a significant number of positive and negative errors. Further analysis indicates that significant negative errors correlate with high bACT and slope and low CHC while significant positive errors with low bACT and slope and high CHC. Conclusion: The mACT can be substantially different from eACT. The accuracy of the HDR test appears to be dependent upon bACT, slope, and CHC. Based on our analysis, we provide several recommendations and a flow chart to improve the quality of individualized heparin management on CPB.

Effect of antithrombin in fresh frozen plasma on hemostasis after cardiopulmonary bypass surgery

Introduction: Supplementation of fresh frozen plasma immediately after cardiopulmonary bypass is an effective method to enhance clotting ability as coagulation factors are consumed in the extracorporeal circuit during cardiopulmonary bypass. On the other hand, the anticoagulation factors in fresh frozen plasma can also deter the clotting ability. This study investigated the effect of fresh frozen plasma administration on the comprehensive clotting ability following cardiopulmonary bypass. Methods: This prospective observational study included 22 patients scheduled for cardiac surgery. Clotting times and maximum clot firmness were evaluated using the types of rotational thromboelastometry, intrinsic rotational thromboelastometry, and heparinase thromboelastography preoperatively, immediately after cardiopulmonary bypass, and 1 hour after cardiopulmonary bypass. Activated clotting time, antithrombin activity, and heparin concentration were also measured at these time-points. Results: Antithrombin activity (62.9 ± 7.2% vs. 51.1 ± 7.4%, p < 0.0001) and activated clotting time (132.6 ± 9.6% vs. 120.0 ± 9.0%, p < 0.001) were significantly higher 1 hour after cardiopulmonary bypass compared to measurements taken immediately after cardiopulmonary bypass. Heparin concentration 1 hour after cardiopulmonary bypass was significantly decreased compared to that immediately after cardiopulmonary bypass. On the other hand, maximum clot firmness determined via intrinsic rotational thromboelastometry was significantly greater 1 hour after cardiopulmonary bypass (53.8 ± 4.8 mm) than that immediately after cardiopulmonary bypass (49.5 ± 4.8 mm). Clotting time determined via intrinsic rotational thromboelastometry and heparinase thromboelastography was also significantly shorter 1 hour after cardiopulmonary bypass than that immediately after cardiopulmonary bypass. Conclusion: Fresh frozen plasma administration increased antithrombin activity and caused activated clotting time prolongation, but then increased clotting ability. Thus, testing by rotational thromboelastometry after cardiopulmonary bypass could be valuable in the detection of comprehensive clotting ability.

Intraoperative Monitoring of Heparin: Comparison of Activated Coagulation Time and Whole Blood Heparin Measurements by Different Point-of-Care Devices with Heparin Concentration by Laboratory-Performed Plasma Anti-Xa Assay

BackgroundCardiac surgical interventions, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, transcutaneous coronary-artery angioplasty, and stenting are carried out while patients are being treated with the anticoagulation drug heparin. Monitoring the level and reversal of heparinization during and at the conclusion of medical and surgical procedures is a critical issue in patient care.MethodsWe performed parallel testing of the ACCRIVA Hemochron Signature Elite ACT+ and Hemochron Response analyzer, iSTAT platform, and 2 Hepcon Hemostasis Management System (HMS) Plus analyzers for monitoring intraoperative heparin treatment. Laboratory anti-Xa assay was used as the criterion standard for heparin measurement.ResultsPoor correlation between the 2 Hemochron analyzers was identified at 0.78. Correlation between the analyzers on the i-STAT platform was 0.97. Regression analysis revealed that i-STAT values were generally lower, by 43 seconds, than Hemochron values. The correlation between Hepcon and i-STAT activated clotting time (ACT) results was 0.94. The i-STAT ACT results were generally 23 seconds lower than the Hepcon ACT values. Correlation coefficients on comparing Hepcon ACT and i-STAT ACT using laboratory anti-Xa assay were 0.83 and 0.87, respectively. The correlation between Hepcon heparin concentration and anti-Xa results was 0.85.ConclusionsACT monitoring with iSTAT offers good correlation between instruments and with the Hepcon ACT. Hepcon occupies a specific niche in cardiac operating departments because of its ability to provide additional information regarding heparin concentration; however, lack of suitable proficiency testing may impair its use. The iSTAT is a more reliable platform for broader, hospital-wide application.

Bleeding Risks in Patients on Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices Receiving Two Different Dextrose Concentrations of Heparinized Purge Solution: A Case Series

Background: The Impella manufacturer has changed its recommendation for the diluent of the heparinized purge solution from 20% dextrose (D20) to 5% dextrose (D5). This reduced viscosity may result in increased purge solution infusion rates and unfractionated heparin (UFH) exposure. Increased UFH exposure could potentially cause increased bleeding events and may necessitate reduction in UFH concentration in the purge solution. Our objective was to evaluate anticoagulation for patients on Impella pumps receiving heparinized purge solution with D20 or D5 diluents. Methods: This retrospective cohort analysis evaluated patients requiring Impella support outside of the cardiac catheterization lab. The primary outcome evaluated the number of patients with at least one supratherapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) while receiving heparinized purge solution alone without systemic UFH. Secondary outcomes included heparin concentration changes made to the purge solution, bleeding, and thrombotic events. Results: Twelve patients received Impella support for an average of 37 hours (range, 10.8-89.6). Four patients received D20 and 8 patients received D5 purge solution. Five patients had at least one supratherapeutic aPTT while receiving heparinized purge solution alone without additional systemic UFH. All 5 patients were in the D5 group. Of these 5 patients, 3 required purge heparin concentration decreases and 3 had bleeding events. No patients had pump thrombosis. Conclusion: D5 purge solution with heparin 50 units/mL may increase the risk of supratherapeutic aPTTs, leading to increased bleeding. Decreasing heparin to 25 units/mL as a standard in purge solution may decrease these risks; however, protection against thrombosis remains unknown.