correct figure
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

50
(FIVE YEARS 9)

H-INDEX

2
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Author(s):  
Johanna Åstrand ◽  
Christopher Knight ◽  
Jordan Robson ◽  
Behzad Talle ◽  
Zoe A. Wilson

Unfortunately, the original publication of the article has an error in the labelling on Fig. 3. The correct figure is given in this correction.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 128-128

In the Research Article entitled “Transient Analysis of Poly (3,4-Ethylenedioxythiophene) Poly (Styrenesulphonate) (PEDOT: PSS)- Polyfluorene Organic Polymer Layer Light Emitting Diode” published in Micro and Nanosystems, 2020, Vol. 12, No. 3, figure 2 has been revised as figure 3 was incorrectly duplicated in place of figure 2. The correct figure is as follows:


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingxu Song ◽  
Yuan Yin ◽  
Jiwei Zhang ◽  
Binbin Zhang ◽  
Zehua Bian ◽  
...  

In the original publication the display of Fig. 1 is incorrect. The correct figure is available in this correction.


Author(s):  
Solange Wagner Locatelli ◽  
Bette Davidowitz

The objective of this work was to evaluate the implementation of a metavisual strategy for students to revise and self-regulate concepts arising in a study of a chemical reaction between ions. For this purpose, two chemistry education undergraduate students at a Brazilian public university carried out an investigative activity, involving metavisual steps, to revise explanatory models at the submicro level. Students were given a problem, namely a reaction between ions drawn from a real-life situation and were provided with clay to construct an explanatory model of the submicro level for the initial and final stages of the reaction. The students were asked to compare their clay model with an example of a scientifically correct figure of the submicro level of the reaction generated by the researchers. At this stage students were given the option to reconstruct their model. Data were captured via photographs of the clay models and students’ verbal discussions as they proceeded through the activity. The findings reveal evidence of self-regulation of mental models at the submicro level, from the interaction of prior knowledge, chemical diagrams and discussions and reflections by the pair of students. Difficulties regarding chemical formulae were also observed in relation to the symbolic level. Finally, there are implications for teaching chemistry, since teachers in training need to experience metavisual strategies for future application in their classrooms.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui Xiong ◽  
Leike Zhang ◽  
Shiliang Li ◽  
Yuan Sun ◽  
Minyi Ding ◽  
...  

In the original publication there are few errors in Figure 1. The correct Figure 1 is provided in this correction


2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Littmann ◽  
Tatyana Goldberg ◽  
Sebastian Seitz ◽  
Mikael Bodén ◽  
Burkhard Rost

Following publication of the original article [1], the author reported that an incorrect figure has been published as Figure 2. The correct Figure 2 is shown below.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 540-541
Author(s):  
Xiaoyan Sheng ◽  
Chenglei Tian ◽  
Linlin Liu ◽  
Lingling Wang ◽  
Xiaoying Ye ◽  
...  

In the original publication the labelling of Figure 1D, Y-axis is incorrectly published. The correct labeling should be read as Fragilis+/SSEA1+ and the correct figure is provided in this correction.


Microbiome ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Weidong Chen ◽  
Kexin Ren ◽  
Alain Isabwe ◽  
Huihuang Chen ◽  
Min Liu ◽  
...  

Following publication of the original article [1], the authors reported an error in Figure 1 and a text on page 13. In Figure 1, some areas are missing and the correct figure is presented here. On page 13, the sentence should be updated to the following (change has been indicated in bold italics).


2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Vázquez ◽  
Koldo Osoro ◽  
Miguel Fernández ◽  
Alicia Román-Trufero ◽  
Javier Regidor-Cerrillo ◽  
...  

In the original publication of this article [1], there are error in the Fig. 5, the “ml” should be replaced by “mL” (Fig. 5A) and “IFNγ” should be “IFN-γ” in Fig. 5A, B. The correct figure is below:


Sensors ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. 3102
Author(s):  
Lu Yan ◽  
Zhiguo Gui ◽  
Guanjun Wang ◽  
Yongquan An ◽  
Jinyu Gu ◽  
...  

An correction is presented to correct Figure 5a in [Sensors, 2017, 17, 555].


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document