Progesterone induced blocking factor in health and disease

The foetus expressing paternal antigens ought to be “rejected” by the maternal immune system. However, the immunological relationship of the mother and the foetus does not follow the rules of transplantation immunology. Maternal immune functions are re-adjusted during pregnancy, to create a tolerant environment for the developing foetus. Progesterone and its downstream mediator; the progesterone induced blocking factor (PIBF) are important in this process. The mRNA transcribed from the PIBF1 gene contains 18 exons, and codes for a 90 kDa protein. The 90 kDa form is associated with the centrosome and plays a role in cell cycle regulation, while smaller isoforms produced by alternative spicing are secreted, and bind to the glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchored PIBF receptor. Upon ligation, the former forms a heterodimer with the alpha chain of the interleukin-4 (IL-4) receptor and activates the Janus kinase/signal transducers and activators of transcription (Jak/STAT) pathway, via which, PIBF induces increased production of T helper2 (Th2) cytokines. PIBF regulates natural killer (NK) cytotoxicity, by inhibiting perforin release from the cytoplasmic granules of NK cells. During normal human pregnancy, the serum concentrations of PIBF increase with gestational age, and lower than normal serum levels predict spontaneous pregnancy termination. Depletion of PIBF during the peri-implantation period in mice, results in lower implantation and increased resorption rates, together with increased decidual and peripheral NK activity, downregulation of the genes implicated in T cell activation in CD4+ cells, and Th1 differentiation of the T cells. PIBF is expressed in rapidly proliferating immature cells as well as several tumours, and regulates invasion. The PIBF gene has been identified in the chromosomal region 13q21-q22—which is a common site for somatic deletions in a variety of malignant tumours. These data suggest that PIBF might be involved in tumorigenesis.

Progesterone Induced Blocking Factor Reduces Hypertension and Placental Mitochondrial Dysfunction with in Response to sFlt-1 during Pregnancy

Preeclampsia (PE) is characterized by new onset hypertension in association with placental ischemia, reduced fetal weight, elevated soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1), and placental mitochondrial (mt) dysfunction and oxidative stress (ROS). Progesterone induced blocking factor (PIBF) is a product of progesterone signaling that blocks inflammatory processes and we have previously shown PIBF to lower mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and sFlt-1 in a rat model of PE. Infusion of sFlt-1 causes hypertension and many characteristics of PE in pregnant rodents, however, its role in causing mt dysfunction is unknown. Therefore, we hypothesize that PIBF will improve mt function and MAP in response to elevated sFlt-1 during pregnancy. We tested our hypothesis by infusing sFlt-1 via miniosmotic pumps in normal pregnant (NP) Sprague-Dawley rats (3.7 μg·kg−1·day−1) on gestation days (GD) 13–19 in the presence or absence of PIBF (2.0 µg/mL) injected intraperitoneally on GD 15 and examined mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and placental mt ROS on GD 19. sFlt-1 increased MAP to 112 + 2 (n = 11) compared to NP rats (98 + 2 mmHg, n = 15, p < 0.05), which was lowered in the presence of sFlt-1 (100 + 1 mmHg, n = 5, p < 0.05). Placental mtATP was reduced in sFlt-1 infused rats versus NP controls, but was improved with PIBF. Placental mtROS was elevated with sFlt-1 compared to NP controls, but was reduced with PIBF. Sera from NP + sFlt-1 increased endothelial cell mtROS, which was attenuated with PIBF. These data demonstrate sFlt-1 induced HTN during pregnancy reduces placental mt function. Importantly, PIBF improved placental mt function and HTN, indicating the efficacy of improved progesterone signaling as potential therapeutics for PE.

Partisan Selective Exposure in COVID-19 News

Partisan selective exposure to online COVID-19 news articles is hypothesized to increase one’s exposure time to politically opinion-reinforcing news when exposed to a more opinion-reinforcing news environment and to increase one’s exposure time to politically opinion-challenging news when exposed to a more opinion-challenging news environment. This blocked 2x3 within-subjects experimental study crossed partisan stance (Pro Jokowi vs. Pro Anies) as the blocking factor with news conditions as the experimental factors (Pro vs. Contra vs. Control). The study randomly assigned 216 participants living in the Jakarta metropolitan area during the COVID-19 pandemic to two experimental and one control group for each stance (Pro Stance, Contra Stance, Control). Data shows how participants significantly spent more time on politically opinion-reinforcing news when in the Pro Stance condition, compared to when in the Contra Stance condition, and compared to when in the Control condition. Participants only significantly spent more time on politically opinion-challenging news when in the Contra Stance condition as compared to when in the Pro Stance condition, but not significantly as when compared to in the Control condition. The study took a look at how partisan selective exposure may play out in a certain news environment and found how a polarized news environment would lead to a more polarized exposure, which could get disastrous as it may play a role in people’s behavior towards the COVID-19 pandemic. Hence, getting ourselves accustomed to perspectives from an equal news environment could lead us to be less polarized, and therefore be wiser at determining our standpoints towards the COVID-19 pandemic.