geometry structure
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

74
(FIVE YEARS 17)

H-INDEX

11
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wu Jie ◽  
He Wei ◽  
Feng Shaowei ◽  
Liu Yang ◽  
Huo Mingying ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 129856
Author(s):  
Ying Chen ◽  
Hongmei Li ◽  
Xiuting Li ◽  
Shiwei Tang ◽  
Chenjie Gu ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 1128
Author(s):  
Nunziante Cascone ◽  
Luca Caivano ◽  
Giuseppe D’Errico ◽  
Roberto Citarella

The objective of this paper is the vibroacoustic evaluation of an innovative material for a sports car roof, aiming at replacing fiberglass composite materials. Such evaluation was carried out using numerical and experimental analysis techniques, with cross-comparison between the corresponding results. The innovative material under analysis is a composite material, with a thermoplastic polypropylene matrix and reinforcement made of cellulose fibers. In order to validate the virtual dynamic modeling of the new material, the inertance on different points of some sheets made of the material under analysis was evaluated by an in-house made experimental activity, performed in the CRF (Fiat Research Center) test room, and cross-compared with corresponding results from a numerical analysis performed with the MSC Nastran software. Then, a realistic model of the car roof of the Alfa Romeo 4C car, made with the new material, was implemented and analyzed from the vibroacoustic point of view. The mere switch to the new material, with no changes in the geometry/structure of the car roof, did not allow preserving the original values of static rigidity, dynamic rigidity, and configuration of modal shapes. For this reason, a geometric/structural optimization of the component was performed. Once the new geometry/structure was defined, a vibroacoustic analysis was carried out, checking for a possible coupling between the fluid cavity modes and the structure car body modes. Finally, the vibroacoustic transfer functions to the driver’s ear node were assessed, considering two different excitation points on the structure. The excellent damping capacity of the proposed material led to an improvement in the vibroacoustic transfer functions and to a reduction in the weight of the pavilion.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (16) ◽  
pp. 3450-3483
Author(s):  
Cristian Valenzuela ◽  
Chu Chen ◽  
Mengxiao Sun ◽  
Zhanpeng Ye ◽  
Jianhua Zhang

Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) with high flexibility in geometry, structure and function exhibit great potential for biomedical applications. Herein the cutting edge of COF-based nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics is comprehensively reviewed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-17
Author(s):  
Ayu Yuliani ◽  
Ordas Dewanto ◽  
Karyanto Karyanto ◽  
Ade Yogi

Determination of reservoir rock properties is very important to be able to understand the reservoir better. One of these rock properties is permeability. Permeability is the ability of a rock to pass fluid. In this study, the calculation of permeability was carried out using log and PGS (Pore Geometry Structure) methods based on core data, logs, and CT scans. In the log method, the calculation of permeability is done by petrophysical analysis which aims to evaluate the target zone formation in the form of calculation of the distribution of shale content (effective volume), effective porosity, water saturation, and permeability. Next, the determination of porosity values from CT Scan. Performed on 2 data cores of 20 tubes, each tube was plotted as many as 15 points. The output of this stage is the CT Porosity value that will be used for the distribution of predictions of PGS permeability values. In the PGS method, rock typing is based on geological descriptions, then calculation of permeability predictions. Using these two methods, permeability can be calculated in the study area. The results of log and PGS permeability calculations that show good correlation are the results of calculation of PGS permeability. It can be seen from the data from the calculation of PGS permeability approaching a gradient of one value with R2 of 0.906, it will increasingly approach the core rock permeability value. Whereas the log permeability calculation for core rock permeability is 0.845.


IEEE Access ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 104676-104687 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao Luan ◽  
Hongmin Geng ◽  
Linghui Liu ◽  
Weisheng Li ◽  
Yuanyuan Zhao ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document