diffuse esophageal spasm
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

174
(FIVE YEARS 16)

H-INDEX

30
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 254-262
Author(s):  
Mario Costantini ◽  
Renato Salvador ◽  
Andrea Costantini

Spastic esophageal motility disorders are represented, as per the Chicago classification 4.0, by diffuse esophageal spasm and hypercontractile esophagus. They are very rare and therefore poorly understood. The diagnosis is usually made by manometry in presence of dysphagia or chest pain, but often it is often an unexpected finding. In this paper, the authors review the current knowledge and possible treatments of these disorders, when needed. They underline that invasive treatments, as surgical myotomy or POEM, are rarely necessary and that the indications for them are based on low quality studies. Therefore, they should be used with extreme caution in treating spastic motility disorders other than achalasia.


2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 994-994
Author(s):  
Kazuya Sumi ◽  
Akira Ishihara ◽  
Haruhiro Inoue

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 927-928
Author(s):  
Yuusaku Sugihara ◽  
Hiroyuki Sakae ◽  
Kenta Hamada ◽  
Hiroyuki Okada

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
George Triadafilopoulos ◽  
Afrin Kamal ◽  
Thomas Zikos ◽  
Linda Nguyen ◽  
John O Clarke

Summary Although High resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) is the gold standard to assess esophageal motility, little is known about the stability of the manometric diagnosis over time and its implications for management. To assess the stability and usefulness of repeat HRM in patients presenting with esophageal symptoms over time we performed this retrospective study of patients with esophageal symptoms. Medical records, questionnaires, and HRM tracing were independently reviewed using the Chicago classification. The primary objective was to assess the stability of the manometric diagnosis over time; secondary objective was its change (positive or negative). At least one repeat study was performed in 86 patients (36% women, ages 20–86, with mild to moderate symptoms), while 26 had a third procedure. Mean intervals between studies were 15 ± 1.6 months (for baseline v. first study) and 13 ± 0.8 months (for second to third study). Of the 27 patients initially with a normal study, 11 changed (five had esophago-gastric junction outflow obstruction [EGJOO], two diffuse esophageal spasm [DES], one jackhammer esophagus [JE], and three ineffective esophageal motility [IEM] [41% change]). Of the 24 patients with initial EGJOO, only nine retained it (65.2% change). Of nine patients with initial DES, four changed (44.4% change). Similarly, different diagnosis was seen in 7 of 24 initial IEM patients (22.7% change). Only one patient had achalasia initially and this remained stable. Additional changes were noted on a third HRM. Fluidity in the HRM diagnosis over time questions its validity at any timepoint and raises doubts about the need for intervention.


Author(s):  
Cesur Samanci ◽  
Yilmaz Onal ◽  
Ugur Korman

Background:Esophageal motility studies are performed in patients who have dysphagia that is not explained by stenosis. Diagnosis can be challenging and requires expertise in the interpretation of tests and symptoms.Aims:Our aim is to investigate the diagnostic value of videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) in combination with esophageal manometry.Study Design: :This study has a prospective study design.Methods:73 patients with dysphagia underwent videofluoroscopy in a standing position. Each subject swallowed barium boluses and findings were correlated with manometry findings.Results:The study cohort was categorized into five groups according to their disease as achalasia (31.1%), presbyesophagus (4.1%), scleroderma (5.5%), neurogenic dysphagia (6.8%), and other diseases (54.4%), which included gastroesophageal reflux, diffuse esophageal spasm, cricopharyngeal achalasia, and diseases with nonspecific VFSS patterns. When evaluating VFSS, the perfect agreement was observed between two observers in the final diagnosis. (kappa: 0.91, p<0,001Conclusion:Although it does not replace manometry, VFSS is important as an additional useful imaging method in EMDs.


Author(s):  
Oleg Gruzdev

Dysphagia is a disorder of the swallowing. The causes of dysphagia are inflammatory processes in the oral cavity, pharynx, esophagus, larynx, mediastinum, foreign bodies, cicatricial strictures and tumors, diffuse esophageal spasm, antipsychotic therapy, and some nervous diseases. It is manifested by difficulties or inability to swallow, pain during swallowing, food or liquid getting into the nose, larynx, trachea. Treatment for dysphagia consists in elimination of the underlying cause of dysphagia.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document