wolf predation
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

101
(FIVE YEARS 12)

H-INDEX

33
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Inner Asia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 257-284
Author(s):  
Kenneth E. Linden
Keyword(s):  

Abstract Leaders and hunters in the Mongolian People’s Republic embarked on a campaign to exterminate wolves who were major threats to the livestock economy. Despite common claims of Mongolian reverence of wolves, the campaign was an intensification and professionalisation of earlier wolf-hunting efforts. Wolf extermination was closely tied up in leaders’ promotion and execution of the second collectivisation campaign (1956–60) both as an external promotion to convince herders to join and an internal measure of success. State planners monitored numbers of livestock killed by wolves and how many wolf pelts were harvested. Professional hunters produced books and participated in conferences to discuss and spread methods of hunting which they articulated as Marxist labour necessary to build socialism. After the end of socialism, centralised wolf-hunting campaigns faded away and many herders point to wolf predation as a societal ill.


Author(s):  
Elizabeth Kari Orning ◽  
Katie Dugger ◽  
Darren Clark

Predator-prey interactions are among the most fundamental of ecological relationships. Recolonizing gray wolf (Canis lupus Linnaeus, 1758) populations present new challenges for wildlife management in multi-prey, multi-carnivore systems. We documented diet composition and kill rates for wolves in a recently recolonized area over winter and summer seasons (2014-2015). Elk (Cervus canadensis (Erxleben, 1777)) were the primary ungulate prey (63%) located at wolf kill sites. Deer (mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus (Rafinesque, 1817)) and white-tailed deer (O. virginianus (Zimmermann, 1780)) were less prevalent than elk in wolf diets, but the amount of deer in diets (40-50%) varied by pack and season. Juvenile elk were the most prevalent class of prey in wolf diets during summer (63.3%) and winter (36.3%), with adult elk (32.5%) observed nearly as often as juveniles in winter. Kill rates varied by season, with rates 2.3 times higher in summer (x ̅= 3.5 ungulates/week/pack) than winter (x ̅ = 1.5 ungulates/week/pack), consistent with increased availability and use of neonate prey. Prey biomass acquisition did not vary by pack or season (summer = 243 kg/week/pack; winter = 182 kg/week/pack). Our study quantified predation patterns for a recolonizing wolf population, and patterns we documented were similar to other multi-prey systems in North America.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (14) ◽  
pp. 8014
Author(s):  
Carine Pachoud

Territorialization aims at improving the effectiveness of public action by adapting to local contexts and including a wide diversity of actors. In the 2000s, the French local authorities, with the support of the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD), launched more transversal and bottom-up policies on the development of mountain pastoral territories in order to counter national and European sectoral and top-down policies. This article focuses on the Territorial Pastoral Plans (TPPs), a policy of the Rhône-Alpes region, which funds projects defined collaboratively between multiple actors in pastoral territories. The objective is to shed the light on the implementation modalities of the TPPs, and to understand the strengths and weaknesses of this policy in terms of governance to respond to the sustainability challenges of the Rhône-Alpine pastoral territories. A document analysis was achieved and interviews were conducted with nine key actors from four pastoral territories. Results showed that awareness-raising and mediation projects are becoming increasingly important because of the growing conflicts linked to the multi-purpose use of these lands and to wolf predation. Moreover, the integration of environmental actors allows better consideration of ecology in projects. However, the current budgetary restrictions limit their capacity of action within the policy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 118 (22) ◽  
pp. e2023251118
Author(s):  
Jennifer L. Raynor ◽  
Corbett A. Grainger ◽  
Dominic P. Parker

Recent studies uncover cascading ecological effects resulting from removing and reintroducing predators into a landscape, but little is known about effects on human lives and property. We quantify the effects of restoring wolf populations by evaluating their influence on deer–vehicle collisions (DVCs) in Wisconsin. We show that, for the average county, wolf entry reduced DVCs by 24%, yielding an economic benefit that is 63 times greater than the costs of verified wolf predation on livestock. Most of the reduction is due to a behavioral response of deer to wolves rather than through a deer population decline from wolf predation. This finding supports ecological research emphasizing the role of predators in creating a “landscape of fear.” It suggests wolves control economic damages from overabundant deer in ways that human deer hunters cannot.


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (46) ◽  
pp. eabc5439
Author(s):  
Thomas D. Gable ◽  
Sean M. Johnson-Bice ◽  
Austin T. Homkes ◽  
Steve K. Windels ◽  
Joseph K. Bump

Gray wolves are a premier example of how predators can transform ecosystems through trophic cascades. However, whether wolves change ecosystems as drastically as previously suggested has been increasingly questioned. We demonstrate how wolves alter wetland creation and recolonization by killing dispersing beavers. Beavers are ecosystem engineers that generate most wetland creation throughout boreal ecosystems. By studying beaver pond creation and recolonization patterns coupled with wolf predation on beavers, we determined that 84% of newly created and recolonized beaver ponds remained occupied until the fall, whereas 0% of newly created and recolonized ponds remained active after a wolf killed the dispersing beaver that colonized that pond. By affecting where and when beavers engineer ecosystems, wolves alter all of the ecological processes (e.g., water storage, nutrient cycling, and forest succession) that occur due to beaver-created impoundments. Our study demonstrates how predators have an outsized effect on ecosystems when they kill ecosystem engineers.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jyrki Pusenius ◽  
Tuomas Kukko ◽  
Markus Melin ◽  
Sauli Laaksonen ◽  
Ilpo Kojola

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 662-674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Bassi ◽  
Andrea Gazzola ◽  
Paolo Bongi ◽  
Massimo Scandura ◽  
Marco Apollonio

2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 1776-1802 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anders Skonhoft ◽  
Jan Tore Solstad

Abstract During the last few decades, the grey wolf (Canis lupus) has re-colonised Scandinavia. The current population counts some 430 individuals. With the wolf re-colonisation, several conflicts have arisen. One important conflict is due to wolf predation on moose (Alces alces). This conflict is studied under the assumption of landowner profit maximisation as well as routinised harvesting behaviour. The analysis emphasises how compensation for the predation loss affects landowner management and harvest profitability. The solutions to the landowner problems are also compared to the overall (social planner) management situation, where traffic costs due to moose–vehicle and railway collisions are included.


Author(s):  
Kristin Barker ◽  
Arthur D. Middleton

Large carnivores like gray wolves (Canis lupus) play key roles in regulating ecosystem structure and function. After being functionally extirpated from the United States by the early 1900s, wolves have recently recolonized portions of their historic ranges and are increasingly coming into contact with a rapidly-growing human population. When carnivores encounter humans, the way they behave, and therefore the way they shape ecosystems, is likely to change. Unfortunately, our ability to predict how wolves will affect ecosystems in human-dominated areas is limited by an incomplete understanding of how and why carnivores respond to human influence. We are therefore investigating wolf kill sites across Jackson Hole, Wyoming, where we can disentangle the effects of multiple simultaneous human influences. Specifically, we are evaluating whether and how spatiotemporal patterns of wolf predation may change in response to unnatural physical infrastructure, disturbance from general human activity, potential threat of mortality, and human-altered prey distributions. Our ongoing field study will help managers anticipate effects of wolf predation in and around human-influenced areas while contributing novel information to theories of predation risk and predator-prey interactions.   Featured photo by YNP on Flickr. https://flic.kr/p/HGfKqs


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 315-332
Author(s):  
Benny Shalmon ◽  
Ping Sun ◽  
Torsten Wronski

Abstract Wild populations of Arabian gazelles (Gazella arabica) were once common on the Arabian Peninsula, but today disappeared from large parts of their former range. In Israel only a small population of currently 30 individuals survived, although it was—and still is—well protected from illegal hunting and habitat destruction. In our study we aimed to identify the factors influencing the population growth of G. arabica in Israel over the last two decades (1995–2017). We tested the impact of five environmental variables including annual mean maximum temperature, rainfall, the availability of two major food plants, competition with sympatric dorcas gazelle (G. dorcas) and predation (mainly by wolves) on two dependent variables relating to population viability (population size, percentage fawn survival) using a retrospective time series analysis. After testing for autocorrelations, two generalized least squares (GLS) models with autocorrelations at 3 and 6 years [GLS-AR(3, 6)] were identified as the best models to explain environmental effects on populations size. Wolf encounter rate had a significant negative effect on G. arabica population size, while G. dorcas population size had a significant positive effect, suggesting that wolf predation shapes the population size of both gazelle species. For percentage fawn survival, model residuals did not reveal any significant autocorrelation and the best fit GLS-AR(0) model retained only wolf encounter rate and mean annual maximal temperature as significant predictors. This result suggests a strong impact of wolf predation and increasing temperatures on the fawn survival of Arabian gazelles. Changed rainfall patterns, food availability and competition between gazelle species had no impact on fawn survival.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document