hrqol outcome
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

5
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

2
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Author(s):  
A. Junkkari ◽  
H. Sintonen ◽  
N. Danner ◽  
H. K. Jyrkkänen ◽  
T. Rauramaa ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is severely impaired in persons with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). The HRQoL improves in a number of patients after the placement of a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt, but long-term follow-up of HRQoL is rare. Methods Extended follow-up (60 months) of a prospective cohort study involving 189 patients with iNPH who underwent shunt surgery. Preoperative variables were used to predict favorable HRQoL outcome (improvement or non-deterioration) measured by the 15D instrument 5 years after shunting. Results Out of the 189 initially enrolled study participants, 88 had completed 5-year HRQoL follow-up (46%), 64 had died (34%), and 37 (20%) failed to complete the HRQoL follow-up but were alive at the end of the study. After initial post-operative HRQoL improvement, HRQoL deteriorated so that 37/88 participants (42%) had a favorable HRQoL outcome 5 years after shunting. Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis indicated that younger age (adjusted OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.77–0.95; p < 0.005), lower body mass index (adjusted OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77–0.98; p < 0.05) and better Mini-Mental State Examination performance (adjusted OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.01–1.32; p < 0.05) before surgery predicted favorable 5-year outcome. Conclusions This extended follow-up showed that the self-evaluated HRQoL outcome is associated with iNPH patients’ pre-operative cognitive status, overweight and age. The post-operative deterioration may reflect the natural progression of iNPH, but also derive from aging and comorbidities. It indicates a need for long-term follow-up.


2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junseok Bae ◽  
Alexander A. Theologis ◽  
Russell Strom ◽  
Bobby Tay ◽  
Shane Burch ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVESurgical treatment of adult spinal deformity (ASD) is an effective endeavor that can be accomplished using a variety of surgical strategies. Here, the authors assess and compare radiographic data, complications, and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) outcome scores among patients with ASD who underwent a posterior spinal fixation (PSF)–only approach, a posterior approach combined with lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF+PSF), or a posterior approach combined with anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF+PSF).METHODSThe medical records of consecutive adults who underwent thoracolumbar fusion for ASD between 2003 and 2013 at a single institution were reviewed. Included were patients who underwent instrumentation from the pelvis to L-1 or above, had a sagittal vertical axis (SVA) of < 10 cm, and underwent a minimum of 2 years’ follow-up. Those who underwent a 3-column osteotomy were excluded. Three groups of patients were compared on the basis of the procedure performed, LLIF+PSF, ALIF+PSF, and PSF only. Perioperative spinal deformity parameters, complications, and HRQoL outcome scores (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI], Scoliosis Research Society 22-question Questionnaire [SRS-22], 36-Item Short Form Health Survey [SF-36], visual analog scale [VAS] for back/leg pain) from each group were assessed and compared with each other using ANOVA. The minimal clinically important differences used were −1.2 (VAS back pain), −1.6 (VAS leg pain), −15 (ODI), 0.587/0.375/0.8/0.42 (SRS-22 pain/function/self-image/mental health), and 5.2 (SF-36, physical component summary).RESULTSA total of 221 patients (58 LLIF, 91 ALIF, 72 PSF only) met the inclusion criteria. Average deformities consisted of a SVA of < 10 cm, a pelvic incidence–lumbar lordosis (LL) mismatch of > 10°, a pelvic tilt of > 20°, a lumbar Cobb angle of > 20°, and a thoracic Cobb angle of > 15°. Preoperative SVA, LL, pelvic incidence–LL mismatch, and lumbar and thoracic Cobb angles were similar among the groups. Patients in the PSF-only group had more comorbidities, those in the ALIF+PSF group were, on average, younger and had a lower body mass index than those in the LLIF+PSF group, and patients in the LLIF+PSF group had a significantly higher mean number of interbody fusion levels than those in the ALIF+PSF and PSF-only groups. At final follow-up, all radiographic parameters and the mean numbers of complications were similar among the groups. Patients in the LLIF+PSF group had proximal junctional kyphosis that required revision surgery significantly less often and fewer proximal junctional fractures and vertebral slips. All preoperative HRQoL scores were similar among the groups. After surgery, the LLIF+PSF group had a significantly lower ODI score, higher SRS-22 self-image/total scores, and greater achievement of the minimal clinically important difference for the SRS-22 pain score.CONCLUSIONSSatisfactory radiographic outcomes can be achieved similarly and adequately with these 3 surgical approaches for patients with ASD with mild to moderate sagittal deformity. Compared with patients treated with an ALIF+PSF or PSF-only surgical strategy, patients who underwent LLIF+PSF had lower rates of proximal junctional kyphosis and mechanical failure at the upper instrumented vertebra and less back pain, less disability, and better SRS-22 scores.


Author(s):  
Colleen M Norris ◽  
Donald Schopflocher ◽  
Emeleigh Hardwicke-Brown ◽  
P D Galbraith ◽  
Merril L Knudtson ◽  
...  

Background Previous investigations by our group have consistently identified important sex differences in HRQOL outcomes of patients with CAD with women reporting poorer HRQOL compared with men. The purpose of this study was to extend our previous work to determine whether sex differences and/or associations in bivariate analyses may provide insight in the modeling of health outcomes data. Method A descriptive analysis of the variables was performed. Sex differences on all variables were examined using t test and Chi-square analyses. The relationships between all clinical, demographic, socio-demographic and HRQOL outcome variables were examined stratified by sex. Results 7062, 1- year HRQOL questionnaires were collected on patients catheterized between Jan 2006 and Dec 2009. 20.8% (1468 of 7062) were from women. Statistically significant sex differences were noted in 10/23 clinical and all 8 of the sociodemographic variables measured. A critical sex difference in the nature of the relationship between depression scores and age was identified. Whereas a quadratic relationship was seen in the men's group, the relationship in the women's group was cubic (figure 1). This implies that analyzing data by including sex, age, and depression scores in the same model will in essence sacrifice the unique nature of the relationship for at least one sex. Conclusions Our data suggests that sex-based analyses should be conducted particularly when modeling predictors of HRQOL outcome. Failing to do so may result in misleading conclusions that will miss opportunities to intervene early in clinically treatable circumstances and to improve the outcomes of men and women with CAD.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3438-3438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara F. Eichhorst ◽  
Kirsten Fischer ◽  
Anna- Maria Fink ◽  
Guenter Fingerle-Rowson ◽  
Anne Westermann ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3438 Poster Board III-326 INTRODUCTION Chemoimmunotherapies like the FCR combination have been shown to increase complete remission rates and progression-free survival in patients with CLL in comparison to chemotherapies without biologicals (Hallek et al., ASH 2008). Until now little is known on HRQOL outcome of CLL patients receiving chemoimmunotherapy. Therefore we assessed the HRQOL in patients with advanced CLL, who were randomized between FC and FCR treatment within an international randomized trial of the German CLL Study Group (GCLLSG). METHODS 817 pts with good physical fitness as defined by a cumulative illness rating scale (CIRS) score of up to 6 and a creatinine clearance (cr cl) ≥ 70 ml/min were enrolled between July 2003 and March 2006. Pts were randomly assigned to receive 6 courses of either FC (N=409; F 25mg/m2 i.v. d1–3 and C 250 mg/m2 i.v. d1–3; q 28 days) or FC plus R (N=408; 375 mg/m2 i.v. d 0 at first cycle and 500 mg/m2 d1 all subsequent cycles; q 28 days). The EORTC C30 questionnaires were sent to all patients included in Germany or Austria at baseline, after 3, 6, 12 months (mo) and then in yearly follow-up (FU). In all other countries questionnaires were handed out to the patients personally on the same time points during their visits in the study center. The analysis of the questionnaires was performed according to the EORTC recommendations (Aaronson et al., 1993). The questionnaire contained a global health scale, five functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional and social), three symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea and vomiting) as well as six single items (dyspnea, appetite loss, sleep disturbances, financial impact, constipation and diarrhea). Mean score values of the EORTC scales ranged between 0 and 100. High scores in the functional scales represent good HRQOL, low scores in the symptom scales a low symptom burden. RESULTS HRQOL was evaluated in 763 (93%) of the included patients who completed at least one questionnaire (376 (49%) FC and 387 (51%) FCR treated patients). The compliance rate was significantly higher in those countries, where the questionnaire was handed out personally (96% in other countries versus 92% in Germany and Austria; P=0.013). Pts answering the baseline questionnaire and at least one further questionnaire (444; 58%) were compared to those how did not (319, 42%): pts with only one or a missing baseline questionnaire had a significantly higher CIRS score (1,7 vs 1,4; P=0.007) and more frequently leukocytopenias (24% CTC grade 3 and 4 leukocytopenias vs 13%; P< 0.001). Age, distribution of Binet stages, gender, poor prognostic factors (del(11q) or del(17p), unmutated IgVH) and treatment arms were similar distributed between both groups. There were also no differences in the rate of other toxicities or response rates. A total of 482 questionnaires were available initially, 406 at interim staging, 454 at final staging, 496 after 12 mo FU, 414 after 24 mo FU and 198 after 36 mo FU. A comparison of the two treatment arms at interim or final staging after 3 and 6 months respectively showed no significant difference between both arms with regards to the global health status, functional scales and symptom scales. Dyspnoe was scored significantly higher during FC treatment in comparison to FCR (23 versus 18; P = 0.023). At 12, 24 and 36 months of FU no significant difference between FC and FCR in all functional scales, symptom scales, single item and global health status was found. Both treatment arms showed slight improvement (defined as difference of 5-10 points) of global health status at 12 months FU in comparison to baseline (FC: 62 at baseline vs 68 at FU 12; FCR: 62 vs 70). CONCLUSIONS Although the FCR regimen is associated with a higher rate of cytopenias in patients' perception this increased hematological toxicity does not result in a difference in HRQOL between both treatment arms. After a median observation time of 38 mo the better efficacy of the FCR regimen with regards on response rates and progression-free survival does not yet result in an improved HRQOL. For the final evaluation of HRQOL outcome after chemoimmunotherapy a longer is FU is needed. Disclosures Eichhorst: Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Hospira: Honoraria. Fischer:Roche: Travel Grand; Munipharma: Travel Grand. Fink:Roche: Travel Grand. Fingerle-Rowson:OrthoBiotech: Employment; Roche: Honoraria. Westermann:Roche: Travel Grand. Wendtner:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; BayerSchering: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Hallek:Roche: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Mundipharma: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.


2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 3-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mazen Abdelhady ◽  
Ashraf Abusamra ◽  
Ahmed Elmaadawi ◽  
Chee Kwan Ng ◽  
Vargur Venkatesan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document