injectable scaffold
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

56
(FIVE YEARS 17)

H-INDEX

19
(FIVE YEARS 4)

Gels ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 49
Author(s):  
Hatem Alnojeidi ◽  
Ruhangiz Taghi Kilani ◽  
Aziz Ghahary

(1) Background: Developing a high-quality, injectable biomaterial that is labor-saving, cost-efficient, and patient-ready is highly desirable. Our research group has previously developed a collagen-based injectable scaffold for the treatment of a variety of wounds including wounds with deep and irregular beds. Here, we investigated the biocompatibility of our liquid scaffold in mice and compared the results to a commercially available injectable granular collagen-based product. (2) Methods: Scaffolds were applied in sub-dermal pockets on the dorsum of mice. To examine the interaction between the scaffolds and the host tissue, samples were harvested after 1 and 2 weeks and stained for collagen content using Masson’s Trichrome staining. Immunofluorescence staining and quantification were performed to assess the type and number of cells infiltrating each scaffold. (3) Results: Histological evaluation after 1 and 2 weeks demonstrated early and efficient integration of our liquid scaffold with no evident adverse foreign body reaction. This rapid incorporation was accompanied by significant cellular infiltration of stromal and immune cells into the scaffold when compared to the commercial product (p < 0.01) and the control group (p < 0.05). Contrarily, the commercial scaffold induced a foreign body reaction as it was surrounded by a capsule-like, dense cellular layer during the 2-week period, resulting in delayed integration and hampered cellular infiltration. (4) Conclusion: Results obtained from this study demonstrate the potential use of our liquid scaffold as an advanced injectable wound matrix for the management of skin wounds with complex geometries.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 46
Author(s):  
Daniela Medrano-David ◽  
Aura María Lopera ◽  
Martha Elena Londoño ◽  
Pedronel Araque-Marín

The occurrence of bone-related disorders and diseases has dramatically increased in recent years around the world. Demineralized bone matrix (DBM) has been widely used as a bone implant due to its osteoinduction and bioactivity. However, the use of DBM is limited because it is a particulate material, which makes it difficult to manipulate and implant with precision. In addition, these particles are susceptible to migration to other sites. To address this situation, DBM is commonly incorporated into a variety of carriers. An injectable scaffold has advantages over bone grafts or preformed scaffolds, such as the ability to flow and fill a bone defect. The aim of this research was to develop a DBM carrier with such viscoelastic properties in order to obtain an injectable bone substitute (IBS). The developed DBM carrier consisted of a PVA/glycerol network cross-linked with borax and reinforced with CaCO3 as a pH neutralizer, porosity generator, and source of Ca. The physicochemical properties were determined by an injectability test, FTIR, SEM, and TGA. Porosity, degradation, bioactivity, possible cytotoxic effect, and proliferation in osteoblasts were also determined. The results showed that the developed material has great potential to be used in bone tissue regeneration.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Francesco K. Touani ◽  
Melanie Borie ◽  
Feryel Azzi ◽  
Dominique Trudel ◽  
Nicolas Noiseux ◽  
...  

The efficacy of cell therapy is limited by low retention and survival of transplanted cells in the target tissues. In this work, we hypothesize that pharmacological preconditioning with celastrol, a natural potent antioxidant, could improve the viability and functions of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) encapsulated within an injectable scaffold. Bone marrow MSCs from rat (rMSC) and human (hMSC) origin were preconditioned for 1 hour with celastrol 1 μM or vehicle (DMSO 0.1% v / v), then encapsulated within a chitosan-based thermosensitive hydrogel. Cell viability was compared by alamarBlue and live/dead assay. Paracrine function was studied first by quantifying the proangiogenic growth factors released, followed by assessing scratched HUVEC culture wound closure velocity and proliferation of HUVEC when cocultured with encapsulated hMSC. In vivo, the proangiogenic activity was studied by evaluating the neovessel density around the subcutaneously injected hydrogel after one week in rats. Preconditioning strongly enhanced the viability of rMSC and hMSC compared to vehicle-treated cells, with 90% and 75% survival versus 36% and 58% survival, respectively, after 7 days in complete media and 80% versus 64% survival for hMSC after 4 days in low serum media ( p < 0.05 ). Celastrol-treated cells increased quantities of proangiogenic cytokines compared to vehicle-pretreated cells, with a significant 3.0-fold and 1.8-fold increase of VEGFa and SDF-1α, respectively ( p < 0.05 ). The enhanced paracrine function of preconditioned MSC was demonstrated by accelerated growth and wound closure velocity of injured HUVEC monolayer ( p < 0.05 ) in vitro. Moreover, celastrol-treated cells, but not vehicle-treated cells, led to a significant increase of neovessel density in the peri-implant region after one week in vivo compared to the control (blank hydrogel). These results suggest that combining cell pretreatment with celastrol and encapsulation in hydrogel could potentiate MSC therapy for many diseases, benefiting particularly ischemic diseases.


Author(s):  
Daniela Medrano-David ◽  
Aura Maria Lopera ◽  
Martha Elena Londoño ◽  
Pedronel Araque-Marín

The occurrence of bone-related disorders and diseases has increased dramatically in recent years around the world. Demineralized bone matrix (DBM) has been widely used as a bone implant due to its osteoinduction and bioactivity. However, the use of DBM is limited because it is a particulate material, which makes it difficult to manipulate and implant with precision, in addition, these particles are susceptible to migrate to other sites. To address this situation, DBM is commonly incorporated into a variety of carriers. An injectable scaffold has advantages over bone grafts or preformed scaffolds, such as the ability to flow and fill the bone defect. The aim of this research is to develop a DBM carrier with such viscoelastic properties to obtain an injectable bone substitute (IBS). The DBM carrier developed consisted of a PVA/glycerol network cross-linked with borax and reinforced with CaCO3 as a pH neutralizer, porosity generator, and source of Ca. The physicochemical properties were determined by the injectability test, FTIR, SEM, and TGA. Porosity, degradation, bioactivity, possible cytotoxic effect, and proliferation in osteoblasts were also determined. The results show that the developed material has great potential to be used in bone tissue regeneration


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 263502542110081
Author(s):  
Christian Hwee Yee Heng ◽  
Yee Han Dave Lee

Background: Injectable scaffold augmentation has been gaining traction as a promising modality for single-stage cartilage repair. It involves the use of a biological scaffold that augments microfracture techniques by aiding in clot stabilization and maturation. The scaffold provides a matrix that helps with mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) retention and encourages differentiation along a chondrogenic lineage. Bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) has also been proposed as an alternative source of MSCs to microfracture, and it can potentially avoid the pitfalls of microfracture techniques. Indications: Injectable scaffold augmentation to microfracture techniques are recommended in lesions >4 cm, as long-term follow-up has shown increasing failure over time with microfracture alone. Technique Description: We describe a technique of autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis using CartiFill, a porcine-derived type 1 collagen scaffold, combined with BMAC as a source of MSCs (avoiding the use of microfracture). Results: Injectable scaffold augmentation has been shown in recent studies to lead to better radiological fill, higher quality of histological repair, and better clinical outcomes as compared with microfracture alone. These injectable scaffolds have the versatility to be used on lesions which have traditionally been considered difficult to address, such as vertical or inverted lesions. Moreover, the use of scaffolds allows the repair to be further augmented with BMAC which provides a source of MSCs without the need to perform microfracture and perforate the subchondral bone. Discussion/Conclusion: Scaffold augmentation is a promising technique that improves upon the results of conventional microfracture repair by allowing augmentation with BMAC, as well as giving surgeons the versatility to apply the scaffold on vertical/inverted lesions. BMAC is also a viable alternative source of MSCs for cartilage repair.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. e751-e756
Author(s):  
Christian Hwee Yee Heng ◽  
Martyn Snow ◽  
Lee Yee Han Dave

Author(s):  
Sofia Santi ◽  
Ilaria Corridori ◽  
Nicola M. Pugno ◽  
Antonella Motta ◽  
Claudio Migliaresi

2020 ◽  
Vol 237 ◽  
pp. 116146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beauty Das ◽  
Arijita Basu ◽  
Somnath Maji ◽  
Koushik Dutta ◽  
Mitali Dewan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document