Analysis the Safety and Efficacy at Different Types of Anesthesiological Support During Aesthetic Interventions on the Breast Glands in Ukraine

The aim is to learn the features of aesthetic and reduction surgical interventions on the mammary glands in Ukraine. Materials and methods. The study was conducted by analyzing the inpatient ambulatory cards of 320 patients. Anesthesia was provided by propofol (n=130), sevoflurane (n=140) and combined use of sevoflurane and nalbuphine (n=50). The results of the study. It was found that usage of combined inhalation analgesia of sevoflurane with opioids was characterized by 41.9% less recovery time. It was found that 8 hours after surgery, the individual assessment of pain was lower in the group of combined analgesia with opioids relative to intravenous anesthesia with propofol (87.5%, p<0.05) and inhalation anesthesia with sevoflurane (71, 3%, p<0.05). After 24 hours all patients reported about pain below 1.0 point, however, in groups where sevoflurane and nalbuphine were used, the level of pain self-esteem was 2.61 and 3 times lower than after intravenous propofol. It was found that within 1 hour after surgery, the average cognitive score on the Montreal scale decreased in the group of intravenous propofol by 5.0% (p<0.05) and by 1.7% under inhalation anesthesia with sevoflurane. Under combined anesthesia the cognitive score remained at 12.0 points. The frequency of postoperative nausea was the highest level in the group of inhalation anesthesia - 16.7%. The addition of nalbuphine to sevoflurane significantly reduced the risk of postoperative nausea (χ2=7.250; p=0.007). Conclusions. Combined anesthesia with opioids is a highly effective anesthetic choice for aesthetic and reconstructive interventions on the mammary glands.

EFFICIENCY OF ANESTHESIA DURING RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY ON THE BREAST

The purpose of the study – to perform a comparative analysis of anesthesia effectivenessduring reconstructive surgery on the mammary glands.Material and methods. 120 women undergoing aesthetic intervention were divided intoanesthesia groups: intravenous anesthesia with propofol; inhalation with sevoflurane,combined with opioids; combined anesthesia with PECS-block.Results. It has been found that the group of combined anesthesia with PECS- block required the least time for analgesia (p<0,05). The greatest depth of medication sleepwas in the group of propofol, the smallest - in the combination of general anesthesia withPECS-block (p <0,05).It was verified that the largest number of patients with unstable hemodynamics wasin the group of propofol (33,3%), and the smallest number - in the group of combinedanesthesia with opioids (6,7%). Predisposition to tachycardia has been reported withthe use of propofol and the combination of sevoflurane with opioids. Bradycardic type ofsinus rhythm was observed in the group of combined anesthesia with PECS-block.Conclusions. In reconstructive interventions on the mammary glands, combinedinhalation anesthesia with sevoflurane in combination with opioids or single-stage PECSI block is promising.

Biochemical markers of surgical stress in endoscopic rhinosinus surgery under combined anesthesia in children

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic rhinosinus surgery in children is associated with a high anesthetic risk because of intraoperative stress. This study aimed to, considering the dynamic picture of the biochemical markers of surgical stress, to assess the effectiveness of regional methods of combined anesthesia in rhinosinus surgery in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comparative study was conducted in parallel groups composed of 100 patients aged 617 years who had undergone an assessment of their physical condition using the ASA I-II scales and planned endoscopic endonasal surgery lasting up to 2 h under combined anesthesia. In all groups, the introductory anesthesia was combined, i.e., inhalation of sevoflurane in an oxygenair mixture in combination with intravenous administration of propofol. To ensure the patency of the respiratory tract, endotracheal anesthesia was administered. Patients were divided into two groups of 50 people each, depending on the method of maintaining anesthesia. Group 1 received inhalation of sevoflurane in an airoxygen mixture with a target value of the minimum alveolar concentration of (MAC) 0.70.9, and regional blockage was performed bilaterally, i.e., pterygopalatine anesthesia with palatine access (palatinal) and infra-orbital intraoral access with ropivacaine solution. Group 2 received inhalation of sevoflurane in an airoxygen mixture with a target value of 1.5 МАС, and 5% tramadol solution was used intravenously for analgesia. RESULTS: Data on the dynamics of glucose, lactate, and cortisol levels in both groups proved the effectiveness and stability of the anesthesia methods used. However, the concentration of the inhaled anesthetic agent in the tramadol group was used was twice as high as the concentration in the regional anesthetic group. DISCUSSION: The dynamics and deviations of biochemical markers of surgical stress were not significantly different in the intergroup and intragroup interstage parameters beyond the reference values. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed anesthesia methods did not induce stress reactions to surgical intervention, and the anesthesia methods in both groups were adequate and effective.

Carbon Footprint of General, Regional, and Combined Anesthesia for Total Knee Replacements

Background Health care itself contributes to climate change. Anesthesia is a “carbon hotspot,” yet few data exist to compare anesthetic choices. The authors examined the carbon dioxide equivalent emissions associated with general anesthesia, spinal anesthesia, and combined (general and spinal anesthesia) during a total knee replacement. Methods A prospective life cycle assessment of 10 patients in each of three groups undergoing knee replacements was conducted in Melbourne, Australia. The authors collected input data for anesthetic items, gases, and drugs, and electricity for patient warming and anesthetic machine. Sevoflurane or propofol was used for general anesthesia. Life cycle assessment software was used to convert inputs to their carbon footprint (in kilogram carbon dioxide equivalent emissions), with modeled international comparisons. Results Twenty-nine patients were studied. The carbon dioxide equivalent emissions for general anesthesia were an average 14.9 (95% CI, 9.7 to 22.5) kg carbon dioxide equivalent emissions; spinal anesthesia, 16.9 (95% CI, 13.2 to 20.5) kg carbon dioxide equivalent; and for combined anesthesia, 18.5 (95% CI, 12.5 to 27.3) kg carbon dioxide equivalent. Major sources of carbon dioxide equivalent emissions across all approaches were as follows: electricity for the patient air warmer (average at least 2.5 kg carbon dioxide equivalent [20% total]), single-use items, 3.6 (general anesthesia), 3.4 (spinal), and 4.3 (combined) kg carbon dioxide equivalent emissions, respectively (approximately 25% total). For the general anesthesia and combined groups, sevoflurane contributed an average 4.7 kg carbon dioxide equivalent (35% total) and 3.1 kg carbon dioxide equivalent (19%), respectively. For spinal and combined, washing and sterilizing reusable items contributed 4.5 kg carbon dioxide equivalent (29% total) and 4.1 kg carbon dioxide equivalent (24%) emissions, respectively. Oxygen use was important to the spinal anesthetic carbon footprint (2.8 kg carbon dioxide equivalent, 18%). Modeling showed that intercountry carbon dioxide equivalent emission variability was less than intragroup variability (minimum/maximum). Conclusions All anesthetic approaches had similar carbon footprints (desflurane and nitrous oxide were not used for general anesthesia). Rather than spinal being a default low carbon approach, several choices determine the final carbon footprint: using low-flow anesthesia/total intravenous anesthesia, reducing single-use plastics, reducing oxygen flows, and collaborating with engineers to augment energy efficiency/renewable electricity. Editor’s Perspective What We Already Know about This Topic What This Article Tells Us That Is New

Comparative Analysis of Memory and Alertness in the Perioperative Period of Operative Delivery in Pregnant Women With Preeclampsia and Without it With Different Kinds of Anesthesia

Relevance. The article investigates the choice of anesthesia technique during a caesarean section, which would minimally affect such components of cognitive functions as memory and alertness.The aim of the study is to increase the safety of anesthetic care in women of reproductive age by choosing the method of anesthesia.Material and methods. Two groups of maternity patients were examined: with a normal pregnancy and preeclampsia. They were tested according to a specially designed examination, which included: MoCA test, Benton’s test, Wechsler’s test, self-assessment questionnaire, hospital scale of anxiety and depression before and after surgical delivery.Results. According to the test results, it was found that memory and alertness in pregnant women were initially reduced (compared to the norm), especially with concomitant preeclampsia. When comparing the test results before and after abdominal delivery, it was found that the deterioration of memory and alertness parameters occurs less after the use of neuraxial methods (spinal and epidural anesthesia) compared to patients who underwent general combined anesthesia.

Maternal and perinatal outcomes in repeated cesarean section

Aim. To analyze the maternal and perinatal outcomes in repeated caesarean section. The first group included 50 laboring women who received combined endotracheal anesthesia for a repeat cesarean section. The second group included 50 laboring women who received spinal anesthesia during the operative delivery. The condition of 100 newborns born by repeated cesarean section was studied.Results. In postpartum period in the women of first group very often, develop endometritis (24%), in second group – 36%, hematometra in first group we see in 12%, in second – 26%. Tracheobronhitis occur in first group among 30%. Research of the condition and course of early neonatal period in newborns showed, that combined anesthesia initiates pathological course of this period. The main complications were asphyxia (28%), and neurological disorders (22%).Conclusions. Different types of analgesia initiate different types of complications in the postoperative period, but better neonatal outcomes with the use of regional anesthesia techniques qualify them as the anesthesia method of choice for repeat cesarean section.