Muscle pump-induced inhibition of sympathetic vasomotor outflow during low-intensity leg cycling is attenuated by muscle metaboreflex activation

Muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) decreases during leg cycling at low intensity because of muscle pump-induced increases in venous return and loading of the cardiopulmonary baroreceptors. However, MSNA increases during leg cycling when exercise is above moderate intensity or for a long duration, suggesting that the sympathoinhibitory effect of the cardiopulmonary baroreflex can be overridden by a powerful sympathoexcitatory drive, such as the skeletal muscle metaboreflex. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that high-intensity muscle metaboreflex activation attenuates muscle pump-induced inhibition of MSNA during leg cycling. MSNA (left radial nerve) was recorded during graded isolation of the muscle metaboreflex in the forearm with postexercise ischemia (PEI) after low (PEI-L)- and high (PEI-H)-intensity isometric handgrip exercise (20% and 40% maximum voluntary contraction, respectively). Leg cycling (15–20 W) was performed alone and during each PEI trial (PEI-L+Cycling, PEI-H+Cycling). Cycling alone induced a significant decrease in MSNA burst frequency (BF) and total activity (TA). MSNA BF and TA also decreased when cycling was performed during PEI-L. However, the magnitude of decrease in MSNA during PEI-L+Cycling [∆BF: –19 ± 2% ( P < 0.001), ∆TA: –25 ± 4% ( P < 0.001); mean ± SE] was less than that during cycling alone [∆BF: –39 ± 5% ( P = 0.003), ∆TA: –45 ± 5% ( P = 0.002)]. More importantly, MSNA did not decrease during cycling with PEI-H [∆BF: –1 ± 2% ( P = 0.845), ∆TA: +2 ± 3% ( P = 0.959)]. These results suggest that muscle pump-induced inhibition of sympathetic vasomotor outflow during low-intensity leg cycling is attenuated by muscle metaboreflex activation in an intensity-dependent manner. NEW & NOTEWORTHY There are no available data concerning the interaction between the sympathoinhibitory effect of muscle pump-induced cardiopulmonary baroreflex loading during leg cycling and the sympathoexcitatory influence of the muscle metaboreflex. In this study, muscle metaboreflex activation attenuated the inhibition of muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) during leg cycling. This may explain, in part, the response of MSNA to graded-intensity dynamic exercise in which low-intensity leg cycling inhibits MSNA whereas high-intensity exercise elicits graded sympathoexcitation.

Evidence for differential control of muscle sympathetic single units during mild sympathoexcitation in young, healthy humans

Two subpopulations of muscle sympathetic single units with opposite discharge characteristics have been identified during low-level cardiopulmonary baroreflex loading and unloading in middle-aged adults and patients with heart failure. The present study sought to determine whether similar subpopulations are present in young healthy adults during cardiopulmonary baroreflex unloading ( study 1) and rhythmic handgrip exercise ( study 2). Continuous hemodynamic and multiunit and single unit muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) data were collected at baseline and during nonhypotensive lower body negative pressure (LBNP; n = 12) and 40% maximal voluntary contraction rhythmic handgrip exercise (RHG; n = 24). Single unit MSNA responses were classified as anticipated or paradoxical based on whether changes were concordant or discordant with the multiunit MSNA response, respectively. LBNP and RHG both increased multiunit MSNA burst frequency (∆5 ± 3 bursts/min, P < 0.001; ∆5 ± 8 bursts/min, P = 0.005), burst amplitude (∆5 ± 7%, P = 0.04; ∆13 ± 14%, P < 0.001), and total MSNA (∆302 ± 191 AU/min, P = 0.001; ∆585 ± 556 AU/min, P < 0.001). During LBNP and RHG, 43 and 64 muscle single units were identified, respectively, which increased spike frequency (∆9 ± 11 spikes/min, P < 0.001; ∆10 ± 19 spikes/min, P < 0.001) and the probability of multiple spike firing (∆10 ± 12%, P < 0.001; ∆11 ± 26%, P = 0.001). During LBNP and RHG, 36 (84%) and 39 (61%) single units possessed anticipated firing responses (∆12 ± 10 spikes/min, P < 0.001; ∆19 ± 19 spikes/min, P < 0.001), whereas 7 (16%) and 25 (39%) single units exhibited paradoxical reductions (∆−3 ± 1 spikes/min, P = 0.003; ∆−4 ± 5 spikes/min, P < 0.001). The observation of divergent subpopulations of muscle sympathetic single units in healthy young humans during two mild sympathoexcitatory stressors supports differential control at the fiber level as a fundamental characteristic of human sympathetic regulation. NEW & NOTEWORTHY The activity of muscle sympathetic single units was recorded during cardiopulmonary baroreceptor unloading and rhythmic handgrip exercise in young healthy humans. During both stressors, the majority of single units (84% and 61%) exhibited anticipated behavior concordant with the integrated muscle sympathetic response, whereas a smaller proportion (16% and 39%) exhibited paradoxical sympathoinhibition. These results support differential control of postganglionic muscle sympathetic fibers as a characteristic of human sympathetic regulation during mild sympathoexcitatory stress. Listen to this article's corresponding podcast at https://ajpheart.podbean.com/e/differential-control-of-sympathetic-outflow-in-young-humans/ .

High-intensity muscle metaboreflex activation attenuates cardiopulmonary baroreflex-mediated inhibition of muscle sympathetic nerve activity

Previous studies have shown that muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) is reduced during low- and mild-intensity dynamic leg exercise. It has been suggested that such inhibition is mediated by loading of the cardiopulmonary baroreceptors and that this effect is overridden by muscle metaboreflex activation with higher-intensity exercise. However, limited data are available regarding the interaction between the cardiopulmonary baroreflex and the muscle metaboreflex. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that cardiopulmonary baroreflex-mediated inhibition of MSNA is attenuated during high-intensity muscle metaboreflex activation. In nine young men, MSNA (right peroneal nerve), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and thoracic impedance were recorded. Graded isolation of muscle metaboreflex activation was achieved via postexercise ischemia (PEI) following low (PEI-L)-, moderate (PEI-M)-, and high (PEI-H)-intensity isometric handgrip performed at 20, 30, and 40% maximum voluntary contraction, respectively. Lower-body positive pressure (LBPP, +10 Torr) was applied at rest and during PEI, to load the cardiopulmonary baroreceptors. Handgrip exercise elicited intensity-dependent increases in MSNA and MAP that were maintained during PEI, indicating a graded muscle metaboreflex activation. LBPP at rest significantly decreased MSNA burst frequency (BF: −36.7 ± 4.7%, mean ± SE, P < 0.05), whereas MAP was unchanged. When LBPP was applied during PEI, MSNA BF decreased significantly at PEI-L (−40.0 ± 9.2%, P < 0.05) and PEI-M (−27.0 ± 6.3%, P < 0.05), but not at PEI-H (+1.9 ± 7.1%, P > 0.05). These results suggest that low- and moderate-intensity muscle metaboreflex activation does not modulate the inhibition of MSNA by cardiopulmonary baroreceptor loading, whereas high-intensity metaboreflex activation can override cardiopulmonary baroreflex-mediated inhibition of sympathetic vasomotor outflow. NEW & NOTEWORTHY The interaction between the sympathoinhibitory influence of cardiopulmonary baroreflex and sympathoexcitatory effect of skeletal muscle metaboreflex is not completely understood. In the current study, light- to moderate-intensity muscle metaboreflex activation did not modulate the suppression of muscle sympathetic nerve activity by cardiopulmonary baroreceptor loading, whereas high-intensity muscle metaboreflex activation attenuated the cardiopulmonary baroreflex-mediated inhibition of muscle sympathetic nerve activity. These results provide important information concerning the neural reflex mechanisms regulating sympathetic vasomotor outflow during exercise.

Stimulation of the cardiopulmonary baroreflex enhances ventricular contractility in awake dogs: a mathematical analysis study

The cardiopulmonary baroreflex responds to an increase in central venous pressure (CVP) by decreasing total peripheral resistance and increasing heart rate (HR) in dogs. However, the direction of ventricular contractility change is not well understood. The aim was to elucidate the cardiopulmonary baroreflex control of ventricular contractility during normal physiological conditions via a mathematical analysis. Spontaneous beat-to-beat fluctuations in maximal ventricular elastance ( Emax), which is perhaps the best available index of ventricular contractility, CVP, arterial blood pressure (ABP), and HR were measured from awake dogs at rest before and after β-adrenergic receptor blockade. An autoregressive exogenous input model was employed to jointly identify the three causal transfer functions relating beat-to-beat fluctuations in CVP to Emax (CVP → Emax), which characterizes the cardiopulmonary baroreflex control of ventricular contractility, ABP to Emax, which characterizes the arterial baroreflex control of ventricular contractility, and HR to Emax, which characterizes the force-frequency relation. The CVP → Emax transfer function showed a static gain of 0.037 ± 0.010 ml−1 (different from zero; P < 0.05) and an overall time constant of 3.2 ± 1.2 s. Hence, Emax would increase and reach steady state in ∼16 s in response to a step increase in CVP, without any change to ABP or HR, due to the cardiopulmonary baroreflex. Following β-adrenergic receptor blockade, the CVP → Emax transfer function showed a static gain of 0.0007 ± 0.0113 ml−1 (different from control; P < 0.10). Hence, Emax would change little in steady state in response to a step increase in CVP. Stimulation of the cardiopulmonary baroreflex increases ventricular contractility through β-adrenergic receptor system mediation.

Short-term variability of blood pressure: effects of lower-body negative pressure and long-duration bed rest

Mild lower-body negative pressure (LBNP) has been utilized to selectively unload cardiopulmonary baroreceptors, but there is evidence that arterial baroreceptors can be transiently unloaded after the onset of mild LBNP. In this paper, a black box mathematical model for the prediction of diastolic blood pressure (DBP) variability from multiple inputs (systolic blood pressure, R-R interval duration, and central venous pressure) was applied to interpret the dynamics of blood pressure maintenance under the challenge of LBNP and in long-duration, head-down bed rest (HDBR). Hemodynamic recordings from seven participants in the WISE (Women's International Space Simulation for Exploration) Study collected during an experiment of incremental LBNP (−10 mmHg, −20 mmHg, −30 mmHg) were analyzed before and on day 50 of a 60-day-long HDBR campaign. Autoregressive spectral analysis focused on low-frequency (LF, ∼0.1 Hz) oscillations of DBP, which are related to fluctuations in vascular resistance due to sympathetic and baroreflex regulation of vasomotor tone. The arterial baroreflex-related component explained 49 ± 13% of LF variability of DBP in spontaneous conditions, and 89 ± 9% ( P < 0.05) on day 50 of HDBR, while the cardiopulmonary baroreflex component explained 17 ± 9% and 12 ± 4%, respectively. The arterial baroreflex-related variability was significantly increased in bed rest also for LBNP equal to −20 and −30 mmHg. The proposed technique provided a model interpretation of the proportional effect of arterial baroreflex vs. cardiopulmonary baroreflex-mediated components of blood pressure control and showed that arterial baroreflex was the main player in the mediation of DBP variability. Data during bed rest suggested that cardiopulmonary baroreflex-related effects are blunted and that blood pressure maintenance in the presence of an orthostatic stimulus relies mostly on arterial control.