entrainment coefficient
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

56
(FIVE YEARS 11)

H-INDEX

15
(FIVE YEARS 2)

Water ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 153
Author(s):  
Stéphane Terrier ◽  
Michael Pfister ◽  
Anton J. Schleiss

Stepped spillways are frequently limited to specific discharges under around 30 m2/s due to concerns about potential cavitation damages. A small air concentration can prevent such damages and the design of bottom aerators is well established for smooth chutes. The purpose of this study is to systematically investigate the performance of a deflector aerator at the beginning of stepped chutes. Six parameters (chute angle, step height, approach flow depth, approach flow Froude number, deflector angle and deflector height) are varied in a physical model. The spatial air concentration distribution downstream of the aerator, the cavity sub-pressure, water discharge and air discharges are measured. The results describe the commonly used air entrainment coefficient, the jet length, as well as the average and bottom air concentration development to design an aerator. The lowest bottom air concentration measured in all tests is higher than the air concentration recommended in literature to protect against cavitation damages. And, unlike smooth chutes, there appears to be no significant air detrainment downstream of the jet impact. One deflector aerator seems therefore sufficient to provide protection of a stepped spillway.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Panagiotis Minos ◽  
Panos N. Papanicolaou

Abstract Planar, vertical buoyant jets are of particular interest, both for research and practical purposes for being related to the disposal of the effluent from wastewater treatment plants or saline, a by-product from desalination plants into a body of stagnant fluid. Analytical, closed form solution is derived for plane buoyant jets based on a buoyant jet width parameter proposed by List and Imberger (1973), and compares to earlier laboratory experiments satisfactorily. The derived entrainment coefficient as a function of the local Richardson number of the flow, takes two asymptotic values for jet-like and plume-like flows, while in fountains it takes values lower than that in jets. Laboratory experiments were performed to measure the penetration height of vertical plane fountains with initial Froude number in the range 20 to 130 using shadowgraph and Planar Laser Induced Fluorescence (PLIF) techniques. Interest was focused on the maximum and terminal, steady-state penetration height before the flow direction reversed. The flow was found to be in a state of unstable equilibrium, as it deviated from the vertical axis, swinging on either side. The equations of motion have been solved numerically using the derived entrainment coefficient function, and the results are congruent to earlier and present experiment for vertical fountains.


RBRH ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolina K. Novakoski ◽  
Rute Ferla ◽  
Priscila dos Santos Priebe ◽  
Aline Saupe Abreu ◽  
Marcelo G. Marques ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Stepped spillways can dissipate a great amount of energy during the flow passage over the chute, however these structures have limited operation due to the risk of cavitation damage. The induced aeration may protect the concrete chute through the air concentration near the channel bottom. Furthermore, some research studies have indicated that the presence of air in flows may reduce the mean pressures. The present research aims to analyze mean pressures, air entrainment coefficient and flow behavior over a stepped spillway with aeration induced by two different deflectors, comparing the results to natural aeration flow. Despite the jet impact influence, the induced aeration does not change significantly the mean pressures compared to natural aeration flow. The air entrainment coefficient, as well as the jet impact position, is higher for the deflector with the longer extension and, although air bubbles can be seen throughout the extension of the chute due to the air entrainment through the inferior flow surface, the induced aeration did not anticipate the boundary layer inception point position.


RBRH ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rute Ferla ◽  
Carolina Kuhn Novakoski ◽  
Priscila dos Santos Priebe ◽  
Mauricio Dai Prá ◽  
Marcelo Giulian Marques ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT The possibility of damage due to the phenomenon of cavitation leads the design of stepped spillways considering maximum specific discharges of 15 to 30 m2/s, a limit considerably lower than that practiced on smooth chutes. Aerators promote the insertion of air in the flow, allowing for the increase of specific flow rates. This work analyzes the pressures on the vertical faces of the steps and the air entrainment coefficient in the flow, through an experimental study in a physical model with a stepped chute angle of 53.13o, considering the installation of aerators in different places of the channel. Comparing the tested conditions with the natural aeration, it is concluded that the installation of the aerator does not change the magnitude of the minimum extreme hydrodynamic pressures, but anticipates the beginning of the flow aeration. A new equation is proposed to estimate the air entrainment coefficient, as well as a methodology for forecasting extreme pressures on the vertical faces of the steps, both valid in the range 3.0 ≤ Fr ≤ 6.0.


Fluids ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 232
Author(s):  
Panos N. Papanicolaou ◽  
George C. Stamoulis

Turbulent round buoyant jets and fountains issuing vertically into a linearly density-stratified calm ambient have been investigated in a series of laboratory experiments. The terminal (steady-state) height of rise and the mean elevation of subsequent horizontal spreading have been measured in positively buoyant jets (at source level), including pure momentum jets and plumes, as well in momentum-driven negatively buoyant jets (fountains). The results from experiments confirmed the asymptotic analysis that was based on dimensional arguments. The normalized terminal height and spreading elevation with respect to the elevation of injection of momentum-driven (positively) buoyant jets and fountains attained the same asymptotic values. The numerical results from the solution of entrainment equations, using an improved entrainment coefficient function, confirmed the results related to buoyancy dominant flows (plumes), while their predictions in momentum-driven flows were quite low if compared to measurements.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 1579-1601
Author(s):  
Romana Akhter ◽  
Nigel B. Kaye

Abstract A series of experiments were conducted to quantify the dynamics of a filling box driven by a line plume that spans the full width of the enclosure. Three configurations were tested namely symmetric (centrally located plume), wall-bounded (plume attached to an end wall), and asymmetric. The front movement for the symmetric and wall-bounded configurations was well described by the standard filling box model. The front movement results indicate that the typical value of the entrainment coefficient $$ \left( \alpha \right) $$ α for an unconfined plume ($$ \alpha = 0.16 $$ α = 0.16 ) could be used to accurately predict the front movement for both the centrally located plume and the wall-attached plume. This is in contrast to other studies that suggest that wall-bounded plumes have a significantly lower entrainment coefficient. The standard filling box model broke down for the asymmetric configuration. As the plume was closer to one wall than the other, the plume outflows that spread out and reflected off the end walls returned to the plume at different times. This created a pressure imbalance across the plume that caused the plume to bend sharply toward the nearest wall. Analysis of the plume outflow as a constant flux gravity current showed that the outflow velocity scaled on the cube root of the plume buoyancy flux per unit width $$ f $$ f , a result confirmed by further experiments. This result was used to quantify the time at which the plume bends and the standard filling box model breaks down.


2019 ◽  
Vol 210 ◽  
pp. 105990 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshifumi Wakiyama ◽  
Yuichi Onda ◽  
Kazuya Yoshimura ◽  
Yasunori Igarashi ◽  
Hiroaki Kato

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document