Influence of Cu+ impurity on the efficiency of creation of electron-hole trapping centers in irradiated Na2SO4 − Cu crystals

The mechanisms of creation of impurity and intrinsic electron-hole trapping centers in Na2SO4 − Cu crystals have been investigated by spectroscopic methods. It is shown that impurity and intrinsic electron-hole trapping centers in the crystal lattice Na2SO4 − Cu are created in the same energy distances approximately 3.87-4.0 eV and 4.43-4.5 eV. During the annealing of electron-hole trapping centers, the energy of the recombination processes is transferred to impurities.

Mechanisms for the creation of intrinsic electron-hole trapping centers in a CaSO4 crystall

The mechanism of creation of electron-hole trapping centers in CaSO4 at 15-300 K was investigated by the methods of vacuum-ultraviolet and thermoactivation spectroscopy. It is shown that electron-hole trapping centers are formed upon trap of electrons in the anionic complexes SO4− and localization of holes in the form of SO4− radical. Based on the measurement of the spectrum of excitation of long-wavelength recombination emission at 3.0-3.1 eV and 2.7 eV, the energy distance of the formed electron-hole trapping centers was estimated (4.43 eV and 3.87 eV).

Intrinsic emission and electron-hole trapping centers in crystals Li2SO4-Cu

In the present work, the emission and excitation spectra in Li2SO4-Cu crystals have been obtained by the methods of vacuum-ultraviolet and thermoactivation spectroscopy. We have studied the nature of emission from a pressed and annealed sample of Li2SO4-Cu powders. It has been revealed that at low temperatures Cu0-SO4--centers are formed during the trap of electrons by Cu+-centers and during localization of SO4--radicals in the form of localized hole centers.

Mechanisms formation of electron-hole trap centers in LiKSO4 crystall

The mechanisms of creation of electron-hole trapping centers in LiKSO4 have been investigated by the methods of vacuum and thermal activation spectroscopy. It is shown that electron-hole trapping centers are formed during the trapping of electrons by anionic complexes and localization of a hole in the lattice in the form of the radical SO4−. The appearance of phosphorescence at 3.0-3.1 eV, 2.6-2.7 eV and 2.3-2.4 eV confirms the creation of electron-hole trap centers.

Supporting the surface charging mechanism of seismic-electromagnetic phenomena by the direct measurements of the electron and hole trapping centers

<p>The mechanisms of the seismic-electromagnetic phenomena (SEP) attracted as precursors of short-term earthquake forecast have been suggested, however, it is still incompletely understood. Among the possible mechanisms of the SEP is the surface charging mechanism related to the electron and hole trapping centers in quartz. Previous studies evaluated the plausibility of the mechanism from the surface charge density by the measurement of current or potential changes. On the other hand, only a few studies have evaluated the plausibility from the direct measurements of the trapping centers’ concentration.</p><p>We have performed low-velocity friction experiments mimicking the fracture with low-frictional heating for simulated fault gouges (commercial natural quartz sands) at a normal stress of 1.0 MPa with displacements up to 1.4 m. In order to measure the concentration of the trapping centers in the simulated-fault gouges, we conducted electron spin resonance for the standard sample, TEMPOL (4-hydroxy-2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-piperidine-1-oxyl), and the gouges before and after friction. In recent decades, researchers also have obtained the concentrations of the trapping centers in the quartz damaged in the rock fracture experiments using ESR and a radical scavenger. From those concentrations with the measured or assumed surface areas, we calculated the surface charge density of the quartz and discussed the plausibility of the surface charging mechanism of the SEP.</p><p>In our friction experiments, the E’ type centers were detected at g<sub>2</sub> = 2.001 (e.g., E<sub>1</sub>’ center; ≡Si･, E<sub>S</sub>’ center; ≡Si･, E<sub>α</sub>’ center; =Si:, where − is an electron pair, : is a lone pair, and ･ is an unpaired electron) in the ESR spectra of the simulated-quartz gouges and the trapping center increased by the fracture of low-velocity friction. Assuming that the trapping centers were produced on the grain surfaces by the fracture, the range of the increase in the surface charge density was (0.21–8.0) ×10<sup>-4</sup> C/m<sup>2</sup>. The rock fracture experiments found the E<sub>1</sub>’ center, non-bridging oxygen hole center (NBOHC; ≡Si−O･), and peroxy center (≡Si−O−O･) in quartz. On the same assumption, the total surface charge density of those trapping centers and the density of the E<sub>1</sub>’ center or NBOHC were estimated as 2.7×10<sup>-1</sup> and 5.0×10<sup>-2</sup>–3.94 C/m<sup>2</sup>, respectively.</p><p>The surface charge density required for a corona discharge that can cause the SEP in the air over a flat plane is reported over 5.0×10<sup>-5</sup> C/m<sup>2</sup>. The quantities calculated above are almost enough to induce a corona discharge. The surface charges can form the electric dipoles on the fault plane, inducing the electric and magnetic fields. Our experiment showed that the fracture by fault motions could produce the surface charges on the fault. It proves that the electromagnetic abnormalities by the fault motions may also be observed through the surface charging mechanism. Therefore, our study supports that the surface charging mechanism is plausible.</p>

Plant tissue imaging with bipyramidal upconversion nanocrystals by introducing Tm3+ ions as energy trapping centers

Bipyramidal LiErF4:Tm3+@LiYF4 upconversion nanocrystals with high signal-to-noise ratio for plant cell imaging.