pulse arrival
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

145
(FIVE YEARS 39)

H-INDEX

20
(FIVE YEARS 2)

Author(s):  
Peter H. Charlton ◽  
Birutė Paliakaitė‬‬‬ ◽  
Kristjan Pilt ◽  
Martin Bachler ◽  
Serena Zanelli ◽  
...  

The photoplethysmogram (PPG) signal is widely measured by clinical and consumer devices, and it is emerging as a potential tool for assessing vascular age. The shape and timing of the PPG pulse wave are both influenced by normal vascular ageing, changes in arterial stiffness and blood pressure, and atherosclerosis. This review summarises research into assessing vascular age from the PPG. Three categories of approaches are described: (i) those which use a single PPG signal (based on pulse wave analysis); (ii) those which use multiple PPG signals (such as pulse transit time measurement); and (iii) those which use PPG and other signals (such as pulse arrival time measurement). Evidence is then presented on the performance, repeatability and reproducibility, and clinical utility of PPG-derived parameters of vascular age. Finally, the review outlines key directions for future research to realise the full potential of photoplethysmography for assessing vascular age.


2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Sondre Heimark ◽  
Ole Marius H. Rindal ◽  
Trine M. Seeberg ◽  
Alexey Stepanov ◽  
Elin S. Boysen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eoin Finnegan ◽  
Shaun Davidson ◽  
Mirae Harford ◽  
João Jorge ◽  
Peter Watkinson ◽  
...  

AbstractVarious models have been proposed for the estimation of blood pressure (BP) from pulse transit time (PTT). PTT is defined as the time delay of the pressure wave, produced by left ventricular contraction, measured between a proximal and a distal site along the arterial tree. Most researchers, when they measure the time difference between the peak of the R-wave in the electrocardiogram signal (corresponding to left ventricular depolarisation) and a fiducial point in the photoplethysmogram waveform (as measured by a pulse oximeter attached to the fingertip), describe this erroneously as the PTT. In fact, this is the pulse arrival time (PAT), which includes not only PTT, but also the time delay between the electrical depolarisation of the heart’s left ventricle and the opening of the aortic valve, known as pre-ejection period (PEP). PEP has been suggested to present a significant limitation to BP estimation using PAT. This work investigates the impact of PEP on PAT, leading to a discussion on the best models for BP estimation using PAT or PTT. We conducted a clinical study involving 30 healthy volunteers (53.3% female, 30.9 ± 9.35 years old, with a body mass index of 22.7 ± 3.2 kg/m$$^{2}$$ 2 ). Each session lasted on average 27.9 ± 0.6 min and BP was varied by an infusion of phenylephrine (a medication that causes venous and arterial vasoconstriction). We introduced new processing steps for the analysis of PAT and PEP signals. Various population-based models (Poon, Gesche and Fung) and a posteriori models (inverse linear, inverse squared and logarithm) for estimation of BP from PTT or PAT were evaluated. Across the cohort, PEP was found to increase by 5.5 ms ± 4.5 ms from its baseline value. Variations in PTT were significantly larger in amplitude, − 16.8 ms ± 7.5 ms. We suggest, therefore, that for infusions of phenylephrine, the contribution of PEP on PAT can be neglected. All population-based models produced large BP estimation errors, suggesting that they are insufficient for modelling the complex pathways relating changes in PTT or PAT to changes in BP. Although PAT is inversely correlated with systolic blood pressure (SBP), the gradient of this relationship varies significantly from individual to individual, from − 2946 to − 470.64 mmHg/s in our dataset. For the a posteriori inverse squared model, the root mean squared errors (RMSE) for systolic and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) estimation from PAT were 5.49 mmHg and 3.82 mmHg, respectively. The RMSEs for SBP and DBP estimation by PTT were 4.51 mmHg and 3.53 mmHg, respectively. These models take into account individual calibration curves required for accurate blood pressure estimation. The best performing population-based model (Poon) reported error values around double that of the a posteriori inverse squared model, and so the use of population-based models is not justified.


2021 ◽  
Vol 65 (11) ◽  
pp. 1136-1144
Author(s):  
A. E. Rodin ◽  
V. V. Oreshko ◽  
V. A. Fedorova

Abstract We have developed a model for the time delay of pulse arrival between stations on the Moon and Earth. Comparison of the lunar and terrestrial time scales is proposed to be carried out by comparing the arrival time moments of giant pulses from pulsars. A method for such a comparison has been developed based on the cross-correlation analysis of the received pulses. Using the example of giant pulses from the pulsar PSR 0531+21, we showed that the error of comparing scales in the case of a high signal-to-noise ratio reaches a sub-discrete level and, thus, is determined by the reception band of the recording equipment.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Bresch ◽  
R. Derkx ◽  
I. Paulussen ◽  
G. J. Noordergraaf ◽  
L. Schmitt ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 419-422
Author(s):  
Hannes Ernst ◽  
Matthieu Scherpf ◽  
Hagen Malberg ◽  
Martin Schmidt

Abstract Mental stress triggers positive inotropic and chronotropic effects as well as peripheral vasoconstriction. This alters the pulse arrival time (PAT), the duration between electrical excitation of the ventricles and arrival of the pulse wave in the periphery. We conducted a study to examine PAT during five rest blocks and under mental stress utilizing the Mannheim Multicomponent Stress Test. Electrocardiograms as well as finger and earlobe photoplethysmograms were recorded. PAT was calculated for over 135,000 heartbeats from 42 healthy volunteers as the time duration between the R peak in the electrocardiogram and the following pulse onset in the respective photoplethysmogram. To identify the effect of mental stress, block-wise PAT means were statistically analyzed with repeated measures ANOVA. The analyses showed significant differences between the block means for both PAT measures (p < 0.001). Post-hoc tests revealed significantly reduced PAT during the stress block compared to all rest blocks for both PAT measures (p < 0.001). We found no significant differences between the rest blocks. Our results support that PAT is a sensitive vital parameter for the detection of mental stress in healthy volunteers. This holds true for both measurement positions, the finger and the earlobe.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document