tumour budding
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

119
(FIVE YEARS 46)

H-INDEX

27
(FIVE YEARS 5)

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paromita Roy ◽  
Lateef Zameer ◽  
Debdeep Dey ◽  
Jayati Datta ◽  
Anand Bardia ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. jclinpath-2021-207957
Author(s):  
Surbhi Goyal ◽  
Priyanka Banga ◽  
Nisha Meena ◽  
Geeta Chauhan ◽  
Puja Sakhuja ◽  
...  

Aims and methodsThe prognostic role of tumour budding (TBd) and its interaction with the stromal microenvironment has gained a lot of attention recently, but remains unexplored in gall bladder cancer (GBC). We aimed to study the interrelationship of TBd by International Tumour Budding Consensus Conference scoring system, tumour–stroma ratio (TSR) and desmoplastic stromal reaction (DSR) with the conventional clinicopathological prognostic factors, mortality and overall survival (OS) in 96 patients of operated GBC.ResultsHigher age, high TNM stage, lymphovascular and perineural invasion, positive resection margins, higher TBd score, low TSR and immature DSR were significantly associated with worse OS. However, on multivariate analysis, only metastases, positive resection margins and TSR <50% proved to be independent prognostic factors. The TBd score of stroma-rich tumour group (6.40±4.69) was significantly higher than that of stroma-poor group (2.77±3.79, p≤0.001). The TBd score of immature and intermediate DSR groups was significantly higher than that of mature group (p≤0.001 and p=0.002, respectively). There was a strong interobserver agreement for TBd score, TSR and type of DSR (Cohen’s Kappa=0.726 to 0.864, p≤0.001). Stroma-rich tumours were significantly associated with immature DSR and fibrotic DSR with high TSR (p≤0.001).ConclusionA high TBd, low TSR and immature DSR were significantly associated with several high-risk clinicopathological parameters and poor OS in GBC. These novel, simple, reproducible and cost-effective parameters may be included in the routine reporting checklist for GBC as additional prognostic parameters that can substratify the high-risk patients.


Author(s):  
Phimmada Hatthakarnkul ◽  
Jean A. Quinn ◽  
Amna Ahmed Mohemmd Matly ◽  
Aula Ammar ◽  
Hester C. van Wyk ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalie C Fisher ◽  
Maurice B Loughrey ◽  
Helen G Coleman ◽  
Melvin D Gelbard ◽  
Peter Bankhead ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Marloes A. Smit ◽  
Gabi W. van Pelt ◽  
Valeska Terpstra ◽  
Hein Putter ◽  
Rob A. E. M. Tollenaar ◽  
...  

AbstractThe tumour-stroma ratio (TSR) and tumour budding (TB) are two high-risk factors with potential to be implemented in the next TNM classification. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the practical application of the two biomarkers based on reproducibility, independency and prognostic value. Patients diagnosed with stage II or III colon cancer who underwent surgery between 2005 and 2016 were included. Both TSR and TB were scored on haematoxylin and eosin-stained tissue sections. The TSR, based on the relative amount of stroma, was scored in increments of 10%. TB was scored following the consensus guidelines; a bud was defined as ≤ 4 tumour cells. For analysis, three categories were used. Cohen’s kappa was used for reproducibility. The prognostic value was determined with survival analysis. In total, 246 patients were included. The TSR distribution was N = 137 (56%) stroma-low and N = 109 (44%) stroma-high. The TB distribution was TB-low N = 194 (79%), TB-intermediate N = 35 (14%) and TB-high N = 17 (7%). The reproducibility of the TSR was good (interobserver agreement kappa = 0.83 and intraobserver agreement kappa = 0.82), whereas the inter- and intraobserver agreement for scoring TB was moderate (kappa 0.47 and 0.45, respectively). The survival analysis showed an independent prognostic value for disease-free survival for TSR (HR 1.57; 95% CI 1.01–2.44; p = 0.048) and for TB-high (HR 2.01; 95% CI 1.02–3.96; p = 0.043). Based on current results, we suggest the TSR is a more reliable parameter in daily practice due to better reproducibility and independent prognostic value for disease-free survival.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Lloyd ◽  
E Ryan ◽  
M Boland ◽  
S Medani ◽  
Abd Elwahab ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Tumour budding (TB) is an adverse histological feature in many cancers. It is thought to represent epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, a key step in the metastatic process. The role of TB in breast carcinoma (BC) remains unclear. Aim To investigate the relationship between TB and other histological and molecular features of BC. Method A systematic search was performed to identify studies that compared features of BC based on the presence or absence of high-grade TB. Dichotomous variables were pooled as odds ratios (OR) using the Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel method. Quality assessment of the included studies was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). Result Seven studies with a total of 1040 patients (high grade TB n=519, 49.9%; low grade TB n=521, 50.1%) were included. A moderate- to high-risk of bias was noted. The median NOS was 7 (range 6-8). High-grade TB was significantly associated with lymph node involvement (OR 2.28, 95% c.i. 1.74 to 2.98, P&lt;0.001) and lymphovascular invasion (OR 3.08, 95% c.i. 2.13 to 4.47, P&lt;0.001). Regarding molecular subtypes, there was an increased likelihood of high-grade TB in oestrogen- (OR 1.66, 95% c.i. 1.21 to 2.29, P=0.002) and progesterone-receptor positive (OR 1.68, 95% c.i. 1.10 to 2.59, P=0.02) tumours. In contrast triple negative breast cancer had a reduced incidence of high-grade TB (OR 0.46, 95% c.i. 0.30 to 0.72, P=0.0006). Conclusion High-grade TB is enriched in hormone-positive BC and is associated with known adverse prognostic variables. TB may offer new insights into the metastatic processes of luminal BC. Take-home message High-grade TB is enriched in hormone-positive BC and is associated with known adverse prognostic variables. TB may offer new insights into the metastatic processes of luminal BC.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Studer ◽  
Annika Blank ◽  
John‐Melle Bokhorst ◽  
Iris D Nagtegaal ◽  
Inti Zlobec ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadine DF Georges ◽  
Beatrice Oberli ◽  
Tilman Rau ◽  
José A. Galván ◽  
Iris D. Nagtegaal ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document