Inter-Limb Asymmetry in Force Accuracy and Steadiness Changes after a 12-Week Strength Training Program in Young Healthy Men

The study aimed to investigate the impact of a 12-week strength training program on force accuracy and steadiness changes in lower limbs in young healthy men. Twenty subjects with a dominant right lower limb were included. They performed a force matching task both pre and post strength training program. The ability to reproduce force was determined by calculating three errors: absolute error (AE), constant error (CE), and variable error (VE). After intervention AE and VE improved in both legs indicating higher improvement in the dominant leg (p = 0.032 for AE and p = 0.005 for VE). However, CE improved only in the dominant leg (p = 0.001). We conclude that strength training improved the accuracy and consistency of force in a force reproduction task. This improvement was more evident in the dominant lower limb. Most likely, the inter-limb asymmetry in changes of force application ability caused by strength training is due to the different mechanisms responsible for the control of voluntary movements in the dominant and non-dominant lower limb.

Visual feedback improves bimanual force control performances at planning and execution levels

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of different visual conditions and targeted force levels on bilateral motor synergies and bimanual force control performances. Fourteen healthy young participants performed bimanual isometric force control tasks by extending their wrists and fingers under two visual feedback conditions (i.e., vision and no-vision) and three targeted force levels (i.e., 5%, 25%, and 50% of maximum voluntary contraction: MVC). To estimate bilateral motor synergies across multiple trials, we calculated the proportion of good variability relative to bad variability using an uncontrolled manifold analysis. To assess bimanual force control performances within a trial, we used the accuracy, variability, and regularity of total forces produced by two hands. Further, analysis included correlation coefficients between forces from the left and right hands. In addition, we examined the correlations between altered bilateral motor synergies and force control performances from no-vision to vision conditions for each targeted force level. Importantly, our findings revealed that the presence of visual feedback increased bilateral motor synergies across multiple trials significantly with a reduction of bad variability as well as improved bimanual force control performances within a trial based on higher force accuracy, lower force variability, less force regularity, and decreased correlation coefficients between hands. Further, we found two significant correlations in (a) increased bilateral motor synergy versus higher force accuracy at 5% of MVC and (b) increased bilateral motor synergy versus lower force variability at 50% of MVC. Together, these results suggested that visual feedback effectively improved both synergetic coordination behaviors across multiple trials and stability of task performance within a trial across various submaximal force levels.

Attentional Resource Associated With Visual Feedback on a Postural Dual Task in Parkinson’s Disease

Background Restricted attentional resource and central processing in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) may reduce the benefit of visual feedback in a dual task. Objectives Using brain event-related potentials (ERPs), this study aims to investigate the neural mechanisms of posture visual feedback and supraposture visual feedback during performing of a posture-motor dual task. Methods Eighteen patients with PD and 18 healthy controls stood on a mobile platform (postural task) and executed a manual force-matching task (suprapostural task) concurrently with provided visual feedback of platform movement (posture-feedback condition) or force output (force-feedback condition). The platform movement, force-matching performance, and ERPs (P1, N1, and P2 waves) were recorded. Results Both PD and control groups had superior force accuracy in the force-feedback condition. Decreased postural sway by posture-feedback was observed in healthy controls but not in PD. Force-feedback led to a greater frontal area N1 peak in PD group but smaller N1 peaks in control group. In addition, force-feedback led to smaller P2 peaks of the frontal and sensorimotor areas among PD patients but greater P2 peaks of the sensorimotor and parietal-occipital areas among healthy controls. However, P1 modulations was present only in healthy controls. Conclusions Force-feedback had positive effect on force accuracy in both PD and healthy individuals; however, the beneficial effect of posture-feedback on posture balance is not observed in PD. These findings are the first to suggest that PD could recruit more attentional resources in dual-task preparation to enhance suprapostural accuracy and avoid degrading postural stability by supraposture visual feedback.