manganese toxicity
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

280
(FIVE YEARS 28)

H-INDEX

43
(FIVE YEARS 2)

PROTOPLASMA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yethreb Mahjoubi ◽  
Touhami Rzigui ◽  
Oussama Kharbech ◽  
Salma Nait Mohamed ◽  
Leila Abaza ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 875512252110236
Author(s):  
Justin P. Reinert ◽  
Laramie D. Forbes

Objective: To review hypermanganesemia-induced toxicities in adult patients receiving parenteral nutrition (PN) therapy. Data Sources: A comprehensive literature review was conducted from June 2020 to May 2021 on PubMED, MEDLINE, Scopus, ProQuest, the Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and Web of Science. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Keyword and Boolean phrase searches were conducted using the following terminology: “manganese” OR “manganesemia” OR “manganism” or “hypermanganesemia” AND “total parenteral nutrition” OR “PN” or “parenteral nutrition” AND “toxicity” OR “accumulation.” Appropriate filters, including “humans” and “English” and NOT “reviews,” were utilized on all databases to improve search outcomes. Data Synthesis: A total of 4 reports detailing hypermanganesemia in 57 patient encounters were included in this review. Significant heterogeneity exists with regard to the duration of manganese supplementation and the dose of manganese. Toxicity associated with manganese was observed in as few as 15 days. The dose of manganese, though likely governed by content in commercially available products, may regularly exceed the recommendations of clinical guidelines and should be limited to 55 µg/day. Select patients with underlying malignancy, those with significant and prolonged Vitamin D deficiency, or those who have acquired a SLC30A10 genetic mutation may be at an increased risk of developing manganese toxicity. Conclusions: Clinicians must be cognizant of the concentration of trace elements added to PN, as manganese, and perhaps other biometals, may accumulate when dosed above the recommended daily allowances.


2021 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 1043-1051
Author(s):  
Yingbin Xue ◽  
Jingye Chen ◽  
Xiaohao Li ◽  
Ying Liu

2021 ◽  
Vol 158 ◽  
pp. 454-465
Author(s):  
Jorge González-Villagra ◽  
Ana Luengo Escobar ◽  
Alejandra Ribera-Fonseca ◽  
María Paz Cárcamo ◽  
Rebeca Patrícia Omena-Garcia ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karthika Pradeep ◽  
Richard W. Bell ◽  
Wendy Vance

After aluminum, manganese toxicity is the most limiting factor for crops grown in acidic soils worldwide. But overall, research on Mn toxicity is still limited. The poor acid tolerance of chickpea may be related to Mn toxicity, but there has been no previous screening of chickpea germplasm (nor in its wild Cicer relatives, Cicer reticulatum and Cicer echinospermum) for tolerance to Mn toxicity. A screening technique was developed for tolerance to Mn toxicity using three released cultivars of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L), Ambar, PBA HatTrick, and PBA Striker; one accession each of C. reticulatum and C. echinospermum; and lupin (Lupinus angustifolius) as a Mn-tolerant check, with eight Mn concentrations of 2, 25, 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, and 500 μM Mn as MnSO4 in a low-ionic-strength nutrient solution. The plants were harvested at 14 and 28 days after Mn treatments. The nutrient uptake in shoots (young, old leaves, and the rest of the shoot) and roots was investigated. The best discrimination between tolerant and intolerant Cicer genotypes based on relative shoot dry weight, root dry weight, total root length, and scoring of toxicity symptoms was achieved at 150 μM Mn after 14 days of growth in Mn solution. Among the chickpea cultivars, the greater relative plant growth (both shoot and root) of Ambar and PBA Striker at 100–200 μM Mn contrasted with that of PBA HatTrick, while the C. echinospermum accession was more tolerant to Mn toxicity than C. reticulatum. Manganese tolerance in both domestic cultivars and wild accessions was associated with internal tolerance to excess Mn following greater uptake of Mn and translocation of Mn from roots to shoots.


2020 ◽  
Vol 202 ◽  
pp. 110904 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuyang Zhang ◽  
Qinghui Li ◽  
Wenluan Xu ◽  
Hua Zhao ◽  
Fei Guo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document