Oligocene-Miocene tectonics of the SW Alps and western Apennines coupled orogenic belts, as recorded by their internal and external syn-orogenic basins

<p>The Oligocene-Miocene evolution of the westernmost part of the Northern Apennines was constrained firstly by Oligocene E-W regional sinistral shearing and then by Early Miocene shortening and Middle to Late Miocene NW-SE dextral transpression affecting the southern termination of the Western Alps arc (Maritime and Ligurian Alps) and the substrate of the Tertiary Piemonte Basin (TPB), which started to be incorporated, in the same time span, in the Northern Apennines belt</p><p>In other words, the dynamics accommodating the different motion of the WNW-directed Adria and SW Alps with respect to the ENE-directed Ligurian-Corso-Sardinian block also controlled the evolution of TPB and its Ligurian substrate since at least the Aquitanian, when a regional conterclockwise rotation began and a deep reshaping of the basin occurred, due to predominant NE-SW shortening concomitant with the Northern Apennines thrust fronts propagation (Burdigalian). On the other side, the infilling of the SW Alps foreland basin was partially controlled also by the resedimentation of non-metamorphic Cretaceous-Paleocene Ligurian units previously deposited along the Briançonnais-Dauphinois continental margin. The subsequent Late Burdigalian to Serravallian extension in the internal side of the SW Alps allowed the creation of accomodation space and the deposition of relevant thickness of sediments in the TPB, during the coeval progressive uplifting of Alpine crystalline and metamorphic units (e.g. the Argentera Massif and Dora-Maira Unit). This Alpine process constrained the shape and evolution of the TPB syn-orogenic sub-basins and their subsequent tectonic paths within the NW Apennines belt, while it was being built. The steps of this Alps-Apennines evolution have been clearly recorded by a set of regional scale, Oligocene to Pleistocene unconformities that can be continuously traced at surface in the southern part of the Piemonte region and in the subsurface of the western Po plain.</p><p>We thus remark that the evolution of the westernmost part of the Apennines can be studied largely referring to the Alpine geodynamics, since, although the Alps and the Apennines are two distinct geomorphologic and geophysical entities at the scale of the Western Mediterranean area, they share common synorogenic basins and consistent kinematic evolution in their junction zone of NW Italy.</p>

Stratigraphic and tectonic control of deep-water scarp accumulation in Paleogene synorogenic basins: a case study of the Súľov Conglomerates (Middle Váh Valley, Western Carpathians)

The Súľov Conglomerates represent mass-transport deposits of the Súľov-Domaniža Basin. Their lithosomes are intercalated by claystones of late Thanetian (Zones P3 - P4), early Ypresian (Zones P5 - E2) and late Ypresian to early Lutetian (Zones E5 - E9) age. Claystone interbeds contain rich planktonic and agglutinated microfauna, implying deep-water environments of gravity-flow deposition. The basin was supplied by continental margin deposystems, and filled with submarine landslides, fault-scarp breccias, base-of-slope aprons, debris-flow lobes and distal fans of debrite and turbidite deposits. Synsedimentary tectonics of the Súľov-Domaniža Basin started in the late Thanetian - early Ypresian by normal faulting and disintegration of the orogenic wedge margin. Fault-related fissures were filled by carbonate bedrock breccias and banded crystalline calcite veins (onyxites). The subsidence accelerated during the Ypresian and early Lutetian by gravitational collapse and subcrustal tectonic erosion of the CWC plate. The basin subsided to lower bathyal up to abyssal depth along with downslope accumulation of mass-flow deposits. Tectonic inversion of the basin resulted from the Oligocene - early Miocene transpression (σ1 rotated from NW-SE to NNW-SSE), which changed to a transpressional regime during the Middle Miocene (σ1 rotated from NNE-SSW to NE-SW). Late Miocene tectonics were dominated by an extensional regime with σ3 axis in NNW-SSE orientation.

GEOLOGICAL AND GEOPHYSICAL DATA OF “EPSILON” FIELD IN PRINOS OIL BASIN

The Epsilon field, is located at the centre of Prinos oil basin (N. Aegean, Greece), 11 km NW of the island of Thassos and 4 km NW of the Prinos field, the first productive oil field in the Aegean Sea. The taphrogenetic basin of Prinos has been widely studied, due to its hydrocarbon reservoirs. Extensive geophysical survey, started at early 1970 ‘s, led to a number of drilling jobs, which confirmed the existence of hydrocarbons in the area. The combined geological information, derived from the analysis of lithological, stratigraphic and geochemical data of the basin, suggested a structural and depositional model, strongly related to the Miocene tectonics and sedimentation. The new geophysical and drilling data from Epsilon oil field, are correlated to that already known, completing the model of the basin. Pay zone is found to be below an evaporitic sequence, consisting predominantly of salt, with anhydrite, clay and sandstone intercalations. These upper Miocene aged evaporites extend, varying in thickness, throughout Prinos basin. Reservoir consists mainly of sandstone with intercalations of claystone and trace of siltstone. The geology of the structure and the initial productivity, were positive for further drilling operations in Epsilon field.