hip fracture mortality
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

44
(FIVE YEARS 21)

H-INDEX

12
(FIVE YEARS 3)

2021 ◽  
Vol Volume 14 ◽  
pp. 10195-10202
Author(s):  
Mohammad Hamdan ◽  
Bassem I Haddad ◽  
Mohammad Jabaiti ◽  
Saif Aldeen Alryalat ◽  
Ahmed A Abdulelah ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Spolton-Dean ◽  
B Kent ◽  
T Ball ◽  
R Middleton ◽  
C Marusza ◽  
...  

Abstract Aim High perioperative mortality rates in surgical patients suffering concomitant COVID-19 infection have contributed to a fall in elective and urgent surgery. However, data and debate have centred around post hoc infected cases, without the context of the rest of the surgical cohort, and without comparable historical control groups. We aimed to address this by studying patients with a neck of femur fracture. This common condition has a stable incidence with good prospective data collected routinely for the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD). Method We analysed NHFD data for all hospitals within our region over a 3-month period, covering the height of the first outbreak and compared this with the same months in 2019. Results The incidence of hip fracture was stable (463 in 2019, 448 in 2020). 30-day mortality was 6.26% in 2019 and 7.14% in 2020 (p = 0.595). In the second cohort, 14 patients tested positive for COVID-19 perioperatively. Of these, 3 died (21%) compared to 29 who tested negative (p < 0.001). Mean time to operation reduced by 1.90 hours, with a significant drop in patients waiting over 36 hours (190 to 85, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between gender, ASA grade or pre-operative AMTS. Conclusions We have confirmed high perioperative mortality for those with COVID-19 infection but have not shown a statistically significant difference in overall mortality from hip fracture during the initial phase of the pandemic. We argue from this data set that the hypothetical risk of surgery during this pandemic may have been overestimated.


2021 ◽  
Vol Volume 14 ◽  
pp. 2741-2747
Author(s):  
Chun-Feng Huang ◽  
Po-Jung Pan ◽  
Yi-Hung Chiang ◽  
Shung-Haur Yang

Author(s):  
Michael Sean Greenhalgh ◽  
Benjamin Thomas Vincent Gowers ◽  
Karthikeyan P. Iyengar ◽  
Riad F. Adam

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 341
Author(s):  
Ramona Dobre ◽  
Dan Alexandru Niculescu ◽  
Răzvan-Cosmin Petca ◽  
Răzvan-Ionuț Popescu ◽  
Aida Petca ◽  
...  

The role of anti-osteoporotic treatment as part of the secondary prevention after hip fracture in terms of mortality and re-fracture risk has been studied, and the results are promising. Decreased treatment adherence and compliance is a problem that needs to be addressed by healthcare professionals. A systematic review of the literature was performed using the PubMed database with terms that included hip fracture, mortality, second fracture, and specific anti-osteoporotic treatment. We included 28 articles, 21 regarding mortality and 20 re-fracture rates in hip fracture patients. All studies showed lower mortality after hip fracture associated with anti-osteoporotic treatment, mostly bisphosphonate agents. The re-fracture risk is still debatable, since conflicting data were found. Although most of the studies showed notable effects on mortality and re-fracture rates associated with anti-osteoporotic treatment, we still need more data to validate the actual results.


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paa Kwesi Baidoo ◽  
James B. Odei ◽  
Velarie Ansu ◽  
Michael Segbefia ◽  
Henry Holdbrook-Smith

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martina Behanova ◽  
Judith Haschka ◽  
Jochen Zwerina ◽  
Thomas C Wascher ◽  
Berthold Reichardt ◽  
...  

Objective: Patients with diabetes have an increased risk of osteoporosis and shorter life expectancy. Hip fracture (HF) is the most serious consequence of osteoporosis and is associated with increased mortality risk. We aimed to assess the association of antidiabetic medications with HF and the post-hip fracture mortality risk among diabetic patients ≥50 years. Design: In this nationwide case-control study 53,992 HF cases and 112,144 age-, sex- and region-matched non-hip fracture controls were analyzed. A cohort of hip-fractured diabetic patients were followed-up for an all-cause mortality. Methods: We defined three groups of diabetic patients based on a prescription of antidiabetic medications: group 1 treated with insulin monotherapy (G1DM), group 2 (G2DM) treated with blood glucose lowering drugs (BGLD) only, group 3 on a combined BGLD and insulin therapy (G3DM). We applied logistic regression and Cox regression. Results: We identified 2757 G1DM patients, 15,310 G2DM patients, 3775 G3DM patients and 144,294 patients without any antidiabetic treatment. All three groups of diabetic patients had increased odds of HF compared to controls. G1DM patients aged 50-64 years (aOR 4.80, 95%CI 3.22-7.17) and G3DM patients (aOR 1.39, 95%CI 1.02-1.88) showed the highest HF odds, whereas G2DM patients had 18% decrease in HF odds than their non-diabetic controls (aOR 0.82, 95%CI 0.69-0.99). All diabetic patients had increased post-hip fracture mortality risk compared to non-diabetic controls. The highest mortality hazard was observed in G1DM patients, being greater for women than men (HR 1.71, 95%CI 1.55-1.89 and HR 1.44, 95%CI 1.27-1.64, respectively). Conclusions: Antidiabetic medications increase probability of HF. Diabetic patients, who sustained HF have higher mortality risk than non-diabetic patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document