Constructing Firefly Luciferin Bioluminescence Probes for in Vivo Imaging

Bioluminescence imaging (BLI) is a widely applied visual approach for real-time detecting many physiological and pathological processes in a variety of biological systems. Based on the caged strategy, lots of...

How to Select Firefly Luciferin Analogues for In Vivo Imaging

Bioluminescence reactions are widely applied in optical in vivo imaging in the life science and medical fields. Such reactions produce light upon the oxidation of a luciferin (substrate) catalyzed by a luciferase (enzyme), and this bioluminescence enables the quantification of tumor cells and gene expression in animal models. Many researchers have developed single-color or multicolor bioluminescence systems based on artificial luciferin analogues and/or luciferase mutants, for application in vivo bioluminescence imaging (BLI). In the current review, we focus on the characteristics of firefly BLI technology and discuss the development of luciferin analogues for high-resolution in vivo BLI. In addition, we discuss the novel luciferin analogues TokeOni and seMpai, which show potential as high-sensitivity in vivo BLI reagents.

A Very Bright Far-Red Bioluminescence Emitting Combination Based on Engineered Railroad Worm Luciferase and 6′-Amino-Analogs for Bioimaging Purposes

Beetle luciferases produce bioluminescence (BL) colors ranging from green to red, having been extensively used for many bioanalytical purposes, including bioimaging of pathogen infections and metastasis proliferation in living animal models and cell culture. For bioimaging purposes in mammalian tissues, red bioluminescence is preferred, due to the lower self-absorption of light at longer wavelengths by hemoglobin, myoglobin and melanin. Red bioluminescence is naturally produced only by Phrixothrix hirtus railroad worm luciferase (PxRE), and by some engineered beetle luciferases. However, Far-Red (FR) and Near-Infrared (NIR) bioluminescence is best suited for bioimaging in mammalian tissues due to its higher penetrability. Although some FR and NIR emitting luciferin analogs have been already developed, they usually emit much lower bioluminescence activity when compared to the original luciferin-luciferases. Using site-directed mutagenesis of PxRE luciferase in combination with 6′-modified amino-luciferin analogs, we finally selected novel FR combinations displaying BL ranging from 636–655 nm. Among them, the combination of PxRE-R215K mutant with 6′-(1-pyrrolidinyl)luciferin proved to be the best combination, displaying the highest BL activity with a catalytic efficiency ~2.5 times higher than the combination with native firefly luciferin, producing the second most FR-shifted bioluminescence (650 nm), being several orders of magnitude brighter than commercial AkaLumine with firefly luciferase. Such combination also showed higher thermostability, slower BL decay time and better penetrability across bacterial cell membranes, resulting in ~3 times higher in vivo BL activity in bacterial cells than with firefly luciferin. Overall, this is the brightest FR emitting combination ever reported, and is very promising for bioimaging purposes in mammalian tissues.

A Biochemiluminescent Sialidase Assay for Diagnosis of Bacterial Vaginosis

Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a common condition among women of reproductive age. A sensitive, quantitative and rapid assay is needed for the diagnosis of and, particularly, therapy monitoring for BV. Bacterial sialidase appears to play an important role in bacterial biofilms on vaginal epithelium, a condition closely associated with BV. Here, we report a biochemiluminescent sialidase assay that uses a substrate derivatized with firefly luciferin. In the presence of sialidase in the reaction, the substrate is cleaved to release luciferin, which is subsequently oxidized by firefly luciferase to generate a light signal. Thus, the light signal intensity can be used to detect and measure the relative concentration of sialidase in a vaginal sample as a means of BV diagnosis. All reagents are present in a reagent bead and sample buffer, enabling essentially a one-step assay. The assay is highly sensitive and quantitative, with a sensitivity and specificity of 95.40% and 94.94%, respectively, compared to the Amsel method. Interestingly, only 27.6% of those with BV had high levels of sialidase activity with a signal to cutoff ratio of 10 or more. The assay may be used for diagnosis of BV, risk assessment of BV patients in terms of sialidase activity levels, and monitoring antibiotic therapy.