societal challenge
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

101
(FIVE YEARS 63)

H-INDEX

8
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillaume Pech ◽  
Emilie A. Caspar

A critical scientific and societal challenge consists in developing and evaluating interventions that reduce prejudice towards outgroups. Video games appear to be a promising method but a number of falls in the current scientific literature prevents to fully understand the potential sizeable impact of video games on reducing prejudice. The present study investigated to what extent a video game designed to reduce prejudice towards minorities in a fictional society has the potential to reduce prejudice towards non-fictional minorities. Participants played either a recently developed game (Horns of Justice, HoJ) designed to reduce prejudice towards non-fictional minorities or a control game. After playing at home, participants performed two tasks in a lab context. We observed an overall positive effect of playing HoJ compared to the control game on attenuating prejudice towards an outgroup individual. We indeed observed that players of the control game had more midfrontal theta activity, reflecting more cognitive conflict, when they acted prosociality towards the outgroup participant and a lower neural response to the pain of the outgroup participant compared to the ingroup participant. These effects were attenuated for players of HoJ. We also observed that players of HoJ had a higher sense of agency when they decided to help the outgroup participant compared to when they did not help the outgroup participant, an effect not observable in players of the control game. These results are promising as they support evidence that using fictional characters in video game may induce positive changes on non-fictional individuals.


2022 ◽  
pp. 027614672110709
Author(s):  
Srinivas Venugopal ◽  
Ronika Chakrabarti

A defining societal challenge in the era of climate change is ensuring consumption adequacy in subsistence communities. To understand the intricacies of this challenge, we have conducted an ethnographic study of a low-income community that relies on subsistence fishing to maintain consumption adequacy. Based on our data analysis, we advance a conceptualization of subsistence livelihood systems that models the tight coupling among its three constituent subsystems: the market system, the social system, and the environmental system. These three subsystems are highly interdependent and operate in concert to maintain consumption adequacy. We then show how climate change-induced environmental disruptions threaten consumption adequacy by disequilibrating livelihood systems in subsistence settings, as well as unpack the self-directed adaptation and mitigation strategies employed by the community in response to the threat of consumption inadequacy. These response strategies create feedback loops to either preserve or attenuate the tight coupling among the three subsystems.


2022 ◽  
pp. 088626052110635
Author(s):  
Solveig K. B. Vatnar ◽  
Christine Friestad ◽  
Stål Bjørkly

Intimate partner homicide (IPH) is an extreme outcome of intimate partner violence (IPV). It is a societal challenge that needs to be investigated over time to see whether changes occur concerning the incidence of IPH, IPH characteristics, socioeconomic factors, and contact with service providers. This study includes the total Norwegian cohort of IPHs between 1990 and 2019 with a final conviction ( N = 224). Poisson regression was applied to model the incidence rate of homicide and IPH between 1990 and 2020 as well as the incidence rates of immigrant perpetrators and victims. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to test the association between characteristics and period 1990–2012 compared to after 2012 as dependent variable. The results show that though homicide incidence rates in Norway declined steadily and significantly after 1990, IPH rates did not begin to decline until 2015. The following IPH characteristics showed reduced incidence after 2012: IPH-suicide, perpetrators with a criminal record, and IPHs perpetrated subsequent to preventive interventions towards the perpetrator. Sentence length in IPH cases had increased. Changes were not observed for any of the other IPH characteristics investigated. IPH is often the culmination of long-term violence and can be prevented, even if risk assessment is challenging due to the low base rates.


2021 ◽  
pp. 107780122110513
Author(s):  
Qais Alemi ◽  
Carl Stempel ◽  
Susanne Montgomery ◽  
Patrick M. Koga ◽  
Valerie Smith ◽  
...  

This study examined the prevalence and social-ecological correlates of male-to-female intimate partner violence (IPV) in Afghanistan. Using data from the 2015 Afghanistan Demographic and Health Survey, which included 20,793 currently married women, we found that the past-year prevalence of physical IPV was highest (46%), followed by emotional (34%) and sexual forms (6%). Results also showed that the risk of IPV in general was associated with an array of community and societal-, family and relationship-, and person-level factors. Our findings point to potential intervention targets for women in this conflict zone where IPV is a highly pervasive and complex societal challenge.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (23) ◽  
pp. 13267
Author(s):  
Christer Gustafsson ◽  
Elisabetta Lazzaro

In this paper we highlight the importance of culture, cultural heritage and creative industries (CCI) in current European policies in relation to a number of societal challenges, and how the CCI are called to innovatively respond to such challenges. We distinguish four main societal challenges to which the CCI can strategically respond and significantly unlock the potential for innovation and smart growth in the EU. These societal challenges are addressed by four main pillars of the CCI, namely: (1) Europeans’ creativity, cultural diversity and values; (2) European identity and cohesion; (3) European employment, economic resilience and smart growth; and (4) Europe’s external relations. We address each societal challenge from the CCI perspective, indicating how the CCI can provide innovative responses to such challenges and enable strategic crossovers through networking and collaboration, but also referring to some criticalities. We further discuss how this CCI capacity needs public support and provide an overview of how this is undertaken via the main EU, national and international policies, with a focus on the latest trends.


2021 ◽  
Vol 70 (10-11) ◽  
pp. 569-583
Author(s):  
Lothar Funk

Zusammenfassung Gesellschaften erwarten von ihren Regierungen, dass sie die negativen Effekte eines Pandemieschocks minimieren. Dieser ist zugleich ein extremer Gesundheits-, aber auch ökonomischer und Gesellschaftsschock. Zudem beschuldigen Kritiker die Politik, individuelle Freiheit zu sehr zu beschränken, um Menschen vor Covid-19 zu schützen. Eine Pandemie wird idealtypisch in Phasen mit unterschiedlicher staatlicher Politik zur Kontrolle und Bekämpfung der Krise eingeteilt. Pandemien verursachen Kollektivgutprobleme, da temporäre Beschränkungen zur Krisenüberwindung nötig sind. Individuelle Eigenverantwortung reicht während einer Pandemie nicht aus. Ergänzend ist kollektive Selbstbegrenzung erforderlich, um Trittbrettfahrerprobleme zu überwinden. Abstract: Public Crisis Policy During a Pandemic: Selected Lessons of Economics Societies expect their governments to minimize the negative impact of the pandemic shock which represents both an extreme health as well as economic and societal challenge. At the same time, critics blame incumbent leaders often for hurting individual freedom and livelihood unpardonable in order to save lives from the covid-19 disease. The article considers ideal typical phases of a pandemic with differing public policies to control and fight the crisis. During a pandemic, space becomes a ‘collective good’ where some kind of rationing is needed if other protective measures work only insufficiently. Personal responsibility only is insufficient during a pandemic. Shared responsibility is needed also in order to avoid free riding problems.


Author(s):  
Elli Zey ◽  
Sabine Windmann

In the COVID-19 pandemic, human solidarity plays a crucial role in meeting this maybe greatest modern societal challenge. Public health communication targets enhancing collective compliance with protective health and safety regulations. Here, we asked whether authoritarian/controlling message framing as compared to a neutral message framing may be more effective than moralizing/prosocial message framing and whether recipients’ self-rated trait autonomy might lessen these effects. In a German sample (n = 708), we measured approval of seven regulations (e.g., reducing contact, wearing a mask) before and after presenting one of three Twitter messages (authoritarian, moralizing, neutral/control) presented by either a high-authority sender (state secretary) or a low-authority sender (social worker). We found that overall, the messages successfully increased participants’ endorsement of the regulations, but only weakly so because of ceiling effects. Highly autonomous participants showed more consistent responses across the two measurements, i.e., lower response shifting, in line with the concept of reactive autonomy. Specifically, when the sender was a social worker, response shifting correlated negatively with trait autonomy. We suggest that a trusted sender encourages more variable responses to imposed societal regulations in individuals low in autonomy, and we discuss several aspects that may improve health communication.


2021 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-25
Author(s):  
Jeffrey S. Mogil

Pain is an immense clinical and societal challenge, and the key to understanding and treating it is variability. Robust interindividual differences are consistently observed in pain sensitivity, susceptibility to developing painful disorders, and response to analgesic manipulations. This review examines the causes of this variability, including both organismic and environmental sources. Chronic pain development is a textbook example of a gene-environment interaction, requiring both chance initiating events (e.g., trauma, infection) and more immutable risk factors. The focus is on genetic factors, since twin studies have determined that a plurality of the variance likely derives from inherited genetic variants, but sex, age, ethnicity, personality variables, and environmental factors are also considered.


2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. De Proost ◽  
G Coene ◽  
J Nekkebroeck ◽  
V Provoost

Abstract Study question What are the moral perceptions and views of women considering social egg freezing? Summary answer Participants did not perceive egg freezing as a morally problematic solution to societal problems but addressed concerns about relationship formation and wanted more social efforts. What is known already Central to the social egg freezing debate is the individualisation argument which underlines the idea that it is morally problematic to use individual medical-technological solutions, such as egg freezing, to solve the societal challenges women face, for instance in the current labour market. It has been said that, instead of quick medical-technical solutions that target individual women’s bodies, we should focus on substantive changes that target the androcentric work culture. This theme relates to feminist concerns about unnecessary medicalisation geared towards women. Furthermore, there is a call for more empirical studies to back up this central normative claim. Study design, size, duration Seventeen participants were recruited by psychologists working in two Belgian centres for reproductive medicine which offer egg freezing for social reasons. In addition, four participants were recruited through via social networks. Interviews took place between February 2019 and November 2020 at a location of the participants’ preference or through online video connections. Participants/materials, setting, methods At the beginning of the interview, open questions were asked to invite the participants to speak about social egg freezing in their own words. In the second part of the interview, we used four cards with controversial statements based on a study of the bioethics literature, to encourage the participants to reflect about ethical concerns. In this part, we engaged in Socratic dialogue. For the analysis, thematic analysis was used combined with interdisciplinary collaborative auditing. Main results and the role of chance This is the first study providing empirical evidence about (potential) egg freezers’ moral reasoning about individualisation arguments. Most participants in our study could make sense of the individualisation argument but emphasised another societal challenge rather than the current labour market. They highlighted ‘the lack of a partner relationship’ as driving their motivation for this procedure. The shortage of eligible partners has been well defined in social science scholarship about social egg freezing but this element has rarely been articulated in the premises of individualisation arguments. This topic of relationships is challenging to analyse from a normative perspective because it was experienced as much more personal and intimate by the women in our study than for instance measures to realise more fair labour conditions, such as improved access to childcare. Some participants believed egg freezing resulted from individual problems and found the individualisation argument not applicable to their own situation. Furthermore, no participant found the individualisation argument legitimate to depict social freezing as morally problematic. Nonetheless, the participants showed a sense of sympathy with women who lack access to egg freezing and were in favour of societal solutions in several public domains. Limitations, reasons for caution Given that we report on a small-scale qualitative study of possible social egg freezers at two Belgian fertility clinics, and that our study foregrounds the voices of mostly white higher educated women who were able to afford this technology, our results cannot be generalised to all social egg freezers. Wider implications of the findings Our findings can contribute to a better understanding of previously identified normative arguments (e.g., individualisation and unnecessary medicalisation). There is a definite need to further analyse the complex interplay between respecting autonomous choices and evaluating contextual factors in this debate and other practices where similar individualisation arguments are used. Trial registration number Not applicable


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document