sulfur nutrition
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

105
(FIVE YEARS 9)

H-INDEX

21
(FIVE YEARS 2)

Agronomy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 2376
Author(s):  
Pavel Suran ◽  
Martin Kulhánek ◽  
Jiří Balík ◽  
Jindřich Černý ◽  
Ondřej Sedlář

Sulfur nutrition is a critical part of proper crop growth and development. In our study, biomass yields (BY) and S uptake were investigated on long-term maize monoculture on haplic luvisol soil during the 23 years of this trial, as well as changes in water extractable (Sw), adsorbed (Sads), mineral (Sav), and pseudo-total S (St) fractions. Treatments used in this study are: (1) Control (Cont); (2) ammonium sulfate (AS); (3) urea and ammonium nitrate (UAN); (4) UAN + phosphorus and potassium (UAN + PK); (5) UAN + phosphorus, magnesium, sulfur (UAN + PMgS); and (6) Fallow. Recently, the Mehlich 3 method started to be used in the Czech Republic to determine content of plant available S. Using this method, it was found that the content of S extracted by Mehlich 3 (SM3) closely correlates to Sav in both topsoil and subsoil (r = 0.958 in 1997 and 0.990 in 2019, both at p < 0.001). We also found that, on average, during the entire experiment, all treatments had increased yields over Cont (135–147%) and increased S uptake (291, 192, 180, and 246% of Cont for AS, UAN, UAN + PK, and UAN + PMgS, respectively). Examining the changes from 1997 to 2019 in topsoil (0–30 cm depth), we discovered a decrease of S content in Sw, Sads, Sav, and St fractions on all treatments to an average of 34.6%, 65.8%, 42.2%, and 78.6% of their initial values. The exception was AS treatment, which doubled its initial content in mineral fractions and maintained the same levels of St, and which we attribute to the very high dose of S on this treatment (142 kg ha−1 year−1). Using the simple balance method, AS and UAN + PMgS treatments lost 142.2 and 95.3 kg S ha−1 year−1 to other sinks, except plant uptake, from the entire soil profile (0–60 cm) during 23 years of experiment. Other treatments also show significant losses with the exception of Fallow. Given these results, it is clear that content of sulfur in soil is generally decreasing and attention should be paid mainly towards minimizing of its losses.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lethicia Almeida ◽  
Jean Christophe Avice ◽  
Annette MORVAN BERTRAND ◽  
Marie H l ne Wagner ◽  
Mar a Reyes Gonz lez Centeno ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 70 (16) ◽  
pp. 4069-4073 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stanislav Kopriva ◽  
Mario Malagoli ◽  
Hideki Takahashi

PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. e0213429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Priyakshee Borpatragohain ◽  
Terry J. Rose ◽  
Lei Liu ◽  
Carolyn A. Raymond ◽  
Bronwyn J. Barkla ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Sukhmeen Kaur Kohli ◽  
Neha Handa ◽  
Parminder Kaur ◽  
Poonam Yadav ◽  
Vinod Kumar ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 111 (1) ◽  
pp. 448-456 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walter D. Carciochi ◽  
Nicolás Wyngaard ◽  
Nahuel I. Reussi Calvo ◽  
Agustín Pagani ◽  
Guillermo A. Divito ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 83 ◽  
pp. 74-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefania Astolfi ◽  
Youry Pii ◽  
Roberto Terzano ◽  
Tanja Mimmo ◽  
Silvia Celletti ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document