living coccolithophores
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

19
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

7
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 111-128
Author(s):  
Danyue Huang ◽  
Haijiao Liu ◽  
Jun Sun ◽  
Yuqiu Wei ◽  
Liuyang Li ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Haijiao Liu ◽  
Jun Sun ◽  
Dongxiao Wang ◽  
Xiaodong Zhang ◽  
Cuixia Zhang ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 131 ◽  
pp. 10-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Bonomo ◽  
F. Placenti ◽  
E.M. Quinci ◽  
A. Cuttitta ◽  
S. Genovese ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 34 (10) ◽  
pp. 132-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hualong Jin ◽  
Yuanyuan Feng ◽  
Xiaoqian Li ◽  
Weidong Zhai ◽  
Jun Sun

2014 ◽  
Vol 33 (8) ◽  
pp. 83-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Bai ◽  
Xiaoyao Gu ◽  
Yuanyuan Feng ◽  
Wensheng Jiang ◽  
Haiyan Jin ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 109 ◽  
pp. 1-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariem Saavedra-Pellitero ◽  
Karl-Heinz Baumann ◽  
José-Abel Flores ◽  
Rainer Gersonde

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 779-806 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Sun ◽  
X. Y. Gu ◽  
Y. Y. Feng ◽  
S. F. Jin ◽  
W. S. Jiang ◽  
...  

Abstract. This paper describes the distribution of living coccolithophores (LCs) in the Yellow Sea and the East China Sea in summer and winter, and its relationship with environmental factors by canonical correspondence analysis (CCA). We carried out a series of investigations on LCs distribution in the Yellow Sea and the East China Sea in July and December 2011. 210 samples from different depths were collected from 44 stations in summer and 217 samples were collected from 45 stations in winter. Totally 20 taxa belonging to coccolithophyceae were identified using a polarized microscope at the 1000 × magnification. The dominant species of the two seasons were Gephyrocapsa oceanica, Emiliania huxleyi, Helicosphaera carteri, and Algirosphaera robusta. In summer the abundance of coccolithophore cells and coccoliths ranged 0–176.40 cells mL−1, and 0–2144.98 coccoliths mL−1, with the average values of 8.45 cells mL−1, and 265.42 coccoliths mL−1, respectively. And in winter the abundance of cells and coccoliths ranged 0–71.66 cells mL−1, and 0–4698.99 coccoliths mL−1, with the average values of 13.91 cells mL−1 and 872.56 coccoliths mL−1, respectively. In summer, the LCs in surface layer were mainly observed on the coastal belt and southern part of the survey area. In winter, the LCs in surface layer had high value in the continental shelf area of section P. The comparison among section A, section F, section P and section E indicated lower species diversity and less abundance in the Yellow Sea than those in the East China Sea in both seasons. Temperature and the nitrate concentration may be the major environmental factors controlling the distribution and species composition of LCs in the studying area based on CCA. Abbreviations: LCs: Living Coccolithophores; CCA: canonical correspondence analysis; DCM: Deep Chlorophyll Maximum


2013 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl-Heinz Baumann ◽  
Babette Boeckel

Abstract. The present study was conducted to provide information about the upper water column distribution of living coccolithophores in the subtropical Gulf of Mexico. In total, 52 plankton samples from 6 stations collected in March 2006 were analysed. Coccolithophore standing crops range from zero in deep-water samples (200 m) to about 23 000 to 46 500 coccospheres per litre at intermediate water depths. From 39 identified taxa, only nine species contribute significant cell numbers of more than 1000 cells 1–1 and comprise more than 5 % of the communities in at least one sample. Emiliania huxleyi was the most abundant species throughout the stations with concentrations of up to 22 700 cells l–1. At all stations, a vertical succession of coccolithophore species was found. Umbellosphaera tenuis (type IV), Discosphaera tubifera, Rhabdosphaera clavigera and, as a minor component, species of the genus Syracosphaera, were mainly restricted to surface waters (≤50 m), all adapted to lower nutrient levels. The assemblage in the deep photic zone (50–150 m water depth) was composed mainly of abundant Florisphaera profunda, Gladiolithus flabellatus and Algirosphaera robusta indicating a tolerance of lower light availability. Thus, the vertical distribution of all coccolithophorid taxa, except the placolith-bearing species, in particular E. huxleyi, was probably controlled by upper photic-zone water temperature and stratification of the water column.


2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 7677-7726
Author(s):  
X. Y. Gu ◽  
Y. Y. Feng ◽  
S. F. Jin ◽  
W. S. Jiang ◽  
H. Y. Jin ◽  
...  

Abstract. To date, very little information on living coccolithophores species composition and distribution, especially the vertical profile has been reported around the world. This paper tries to fill this gap by descripting on living coccolithophores (LCs) distribution in the Yellow Sea and the East China Sea in summer and winter time in detail, and its relationship among enviromental factors by canonical correspondence analysis (CCA). We carried out the investigations on LC distribution in the Yellow Sea and the East China Sea in July and December 2011. 210 samples from different depths were collected from 44 stations in summer and 217 samples were collected from 45 stations in winter. Totally 20 taxa belonging to coccolithophyceae were identified using a polarized microscope at the 1000 × magnification. The dominant species of the two seasons were Gephyrocapsa oceanica, Emiliania huxleyi, Helicosphaera carteri, and Algirosphaera robusta. In summer the abundance of cells and coccoliths ranged 0 ~ 176.40 cells mL−1, and 0 ~ 2144.98 coccoliths mL−1, with the average values of 8.45 cells mL−1, and 265.42 coccoliths mL−1, respectively. And in winter the abundance of cells and coccoliths ranged 0 ~ 71.66 cells mL−1, and 0 ~ 4698.99 coccoliths mL−1, with the average values of 13.91 cells mL−1 and 872.56 coccoliths mL−1 respectively. In summer the LCs in surface layer were mainly observed on the coastal belt and southern part of the survey area. The highest abundance was found at the bloom station. In winter the LCs in surface layer had high value in the continental shelf area of section P. The comparison among section A, section F, section P and section E indicated lower species diversity and less abundance in the Yellow Sea than those of the East China Sea in both seasons. Temperature and the nitrate concentration may be the major environmental factors controlling the distribution and species composition of LCs in the studying area based on CCA.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document