Additional Insights Into the Use of Preterm Formula Among Neonates

Author(s):  
Kanya Mukhopadhyay
Keyword(s):  
Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 2089
Author(s):  
Machiko Suganuma ◽  
Alice R. Rumbold ◽  
Jacqueline Miller ◽  
Yan Fong Chong ◽  
Carmel T. Collins

Human milk (HM) is the gold standard for feeding infants but has been associated with slower growth in preterm infants compared with preterm formula. This systematic review and meta-analysis summarises the post-1990 literature to examine the effect of HM feeding on growth during the neonatal admission of preterm infants with birth weight ≤1500 g and/or born ≤28 weeks’ gestation. Medline, PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus were searched, and comparisons were grouped as exclusive human milk (EHM) vs. exclusive preterm formula (EPTF), any HM vs. EPTF, and higher vs. lower doses of HM. We selected studies that used fortified HM and compared that with a PTF; studies comparing unfortified HM and term formula were excluded. Experimental and observational studies were pooled separately. The GRADE system was used to evaluate risk of bias and certainty of evidence. Forty-four studies were included with 37 (n = 9963 infants) included in the meta-analyses. In general, due to poor quality studies, evidence of the effect of any HM feeds or higher versus lower doses of HM was inconclusive. There was a possible effect that lower doses of HM compared with higher doses of HM improved weight gain during the hospital admission, and separately, a possible effect of increased head circumference growth in infants fed EPTF vs. any HM. The clinical significance of this is unclear. There was insufficient evidence to determine the effects of an exclusive HM diet on any outcomes.


2002 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 503-507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Eulógio Martinez ◽  
Vanessa Moura Sieber ◽  
Salim Moysés Jorge ◽  
Maria Lúcia Silveira Ferlin ◽  
Marisa Márcia Mussi-Pinhata

2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Simonetta Costa ◽  
Luca Maggio ◽  
Giovanni Alighieri ◽  
Giovanni Barone ◽  
Francesco Cota ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 2333794X2093785
Author(s):  
Netsanet Workneh Gidi ◽  
Amha Mekasha ◽  
Assaye K. Nigussie ◽  
Robert L. Goldenberg ◽  
Elizabeth M. McClure ◽  
...  

Background. In low-income countries, preterm nutrition is often inadequately addressed. The aim of the study was to assess the patterns of feeding and associated clinical outcomes of preterm neonates admitted to neonatal intensive care units in Ethiopia. Method. This was a multicenter, prospective study. Infants’ clinical characteristics at birth, daily monitoring of feeding history, and weight measurements were collected. An outcome assessment was completed at 28 days. Result. For this analysis, 2560 infants (53% male) were eligible. The mean (SD) gestational age was 33.1 (2.2) weeks. During the hospital stay the proportion of infants on breast milk only, preterm formula, term formula, and mixed feeding was 58%, 27.4%, 1.6%, and 34.1%, respectively. Delay in enteral feeding was associated with increased risk of death (odds ratio [OR] = 1.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.33-2.78; P < .001) and (OR = 5.06, 95% CI = 3.23-7.87; P < .001) for 1 to 3 and 4 to 6 days of delay in enteral feeding, respectively, after adjusting for possible confounders. The length of delay in enteral feeding was associated with increased risk of hypoglycemia (OR = 1.2, 95% CI = 1.1-1.2; P = .005). The mortality rate was lower in hospitals providing preterm formula more often ( P = .04). Half of the infants continued losing weight at the time of discharge. Conclusion. Delayed enteral feeding significantly increases the risk of mortality before discharge and hypoglycemia in preterm infants in resource-limited settings. Ensuring adequate nutritional support of preterm infants is highly needed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document