scholarly journals Shortening the ex vivo culture of CD19‐specific CAR T‐cells retains potent efficacy against acute lymphoblastic leukemia without CAR T‐cell‐related encephalopathy syndrome or severe cytokine release syndrome

2019 ◽  
Vol 94 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanfang Tu ◽  
Rui Huang ◽  
Zhenling Guo ◽  
Lan Deng ◽  
Chaoyang Song ◽  
...  
Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 133 (21) ◽  
pp. 2291-2304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diego Sánchez-Martínez ◽  
Matteo L. Baroni ◽  
Francisco Gutierrez-Agüera ◽  
Heleia Roca-Ho ◽  
Oscar Blanch-Lombarte ◽  
...  

Abstract Relapsed/refractory T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) has a dismal outcome, and no effective targeted immunotherapies for T-ALL exist. The extension of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells (CARTs) to T-ALL remains challenging because the shared expression of target antigens between CARTs and T-ALL blasts leads to CART fratricide. CD1a is exclusively expressed in cortical T-ALL (coT-ALL), a major subset of T-ALL, and retained at relapse. This article reports that the expression of CD1a is mainly restricted to developing cortical thymocytes, and neither CD34+ progenitors nor T cells express CD1a during ontogeny, confining the risk of on-target/off-tumor toxicity. We thus developed and preclinically validated a CD1a-specific CAR with robust and specific cytotoxicity in vitro and antileukemic activity in vivo in xenograft models of coT-ALL, using both cell lines and coT-ALL patient–derived primary blasts. CD1a-CARTs are fratricide resistant, persist long term in vivo (retaining antileukemic activity in re-challenge experiments), and respond to viral antigens. Our data support the therapeutic and safe use of fratricide-resistant CD1a-CARTs for relapsed/refractory coT-ALL.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 19-20
Author(s):  
Yi Wang ◽  
Hui Wang ◽  
Ying Gao ◽  
Ding Zhang ◽  
Yan Zheng ◽  
...  

Introduction: It has been made great clinical progresses in hematological malignancies by chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy which utilizes virus vector for manufacture. However, there're still issues unresolved, for instance, sophisticated virus production process, deadly Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS) side-effect, and high recurrence rate, which probably limit the availability of CAR-T therapy. Non-viral Genome Targeting CAR-T (nvGT CAR-T) may provide a feasible solution to those unmet needs mentioned above. We used CRISPR-Cas9 and non-viral vector to insert anti-CD19 CAR DNA to a specific genome locus in human T cells, which in theory, produces more moderate CAR-T cells compared with conventional CAR-T cells. The efficacy of anti-CD19 nvGT CAR-T cells had been demonstrated in our previous pre-clinical studies, and in this Phase I clinical trial (ChiCTR2000031942), its safety and efficacy in relapsed/refractory B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (r/r B-ALL) patients were explored. Objective: The primary objective of this Phase I trial is to assess safety, including evaluation of adverse events (AEs) and AEs of special interest, such as CRS and neurotoxicity. Secondary objective is to evaluate efficacy as measured by the ratio of complete remission (CR). Method: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were collected from patients or allogeneic donors, then CD3+ T cells were selected and modified by nvGT vector to produce anti-CD19 CAR-T, then administrated to patients with r/r B-ALL. Up to July 2020, twelve patients with r/r B-ALL had been enrolled in this study and 8 patients completed their treatments and entered follow-up period. For 8 patients with follow-up data, the median age was 33 years (range, 13 to 61), and the median number of previous regimens was 5 (range, 2 to 11). The median baseline percentage of bone marrow (BM) blast is 72% (range, 24.5% to 99%). Among those subjects, 2 patients once have been conducted autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Auto-HSCT or Allo-HSCT), and 2 patients experienced serious infection before CAR-T infusion. No patient has been treated by any other CAR-T therapy before enrollment. Baseline characteristics refer to Table 1. Administering a lymphodepleting chemotherapy regimen of cyclophosphamide 450-750 mg/m2 intravenously and fludarabine 25-45 mg/m2 intravenously on the fifth, fourth, and third day before infusion of anti-CD19 nvGT CAR-T, all patients received an infusion at dose of 0.55-8.21×106/kg (Table 1). Result: Until day 30 post CAR-T cell infusion, 8/8 (100%) cases achieved CR and 7/8 (87.5%) had minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative CR (Table 1). Anti-bacterial and anti-fungal were performed in patients SC-3, SC-4 and SC-5 after CAR-T cell infusion, which seems no influence on efficacy. Patient SC-7 was diagnosed as T-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia before Allo-HSCT but with recent recurrence of B-ALL, which was MRD-negative CR on day 21 post nvGT CAR-T therapy. Up to July 2020, all cases remain CR status. CRS occurred in all patients (100%) receiving anti-CD19 nvGT CAR-T cell, including 1 patient (12.5%) with grade 3 (Lee grading system1) CRS, two (25%) with grade 2 CRS, and 5 (62.5%) with grade 1 CRS. There were no cases of grade 4 or higher CRS (Table 1). The median time to onset CRS was 9 days (range, 1 to 12 days) and the median duration of CRS was 6 days (range, 2 to 9 days). None developed neurotoxicity. No fatal or life-threatening reactions happened and no Tocilizumab and Corticosteroids administered following CAR-T treatment. Data including body temperature (Figure 1), CAR-positive T cell percentage (Figure 2), Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and Interleukin-8 (IL-8) (Figure 3 and 4), C-reactive Protein (CRP) (Figure 5), Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) (Figure 6), and Procalcitonin (PCT) (Figure 7), are in accordance with the trend of CRS. Conclusion: This Phase I clinical trial primarily validates the efficacy of this novel CAR-T therapy, however, it still needs time to prove its durability. Surprisingly, we find that nvGT CAR-T therapy is seemingly superior than viral CAR-T therapy in terms of safety. All subjects which are high-risk patients with high tumor burden had low grade CRS, even a few patients sent home for observation post infusion with limited time of in-patient care. Furthermore, patients could tolerate a higher dose without severe adverse events, which probably bring a better dose-related efficacy. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Author(s):  
Bill X. Wu ◽  
No-Joon Song ◽  
Brian P. Riesenberg ◽  
Zihai Li

Abstract The use of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell technology as a therapeutic strategy for the treatment blood-born human cancers has delivered outstanding clinical efficacy. However, this treatment modality can also be associated with serious adverse events in the form of cytokine release syndrome. While several avenues are being pursued to limit the off-target effects, it is critically important that any intervention strategy has minimal consequences on long term efficacy. A recent study published in Science Translational Medicine by Dr. Hudecek’s group proved that dasatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, can serve as an on/off switch for CD19-CAR-T cells in preclinical models by limiting toxicities while maintaining therapeutic efficacy. In this editorial, we discuss the recent strategies for generating safer CAR-T cells, and also important questions surrounding the use of dasatinib for emergency intervention of CAR-T cell mediated cytokine release syndrome.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1115-1115
Author(s):  
Elad Jacoby ◽  
Haiying Qin ◽  
Yinmeng Yang ◽  
Christopher Daniel Chien ◽  
Terry J Fry

Abstract A significant portion of patients with relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who are eligible for treatment with chimeric-antigen-receptor (CAR) T cells have undergone a previous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. We and others have previously demonstrated that the allogeneic environment, even in the presence mild graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), severely impairs tumor-directed T-cell immunity. To study the behavior of CAR cells in the allogeneic setting we chose a murine model of minor mismatched allogeneic T-cell depleted bone marrow transplantation (BMT) followed by CAR T (CD19-28-z) cell infusion in recipients bearing a murine B-precursor ALL model (positive for CD19). Importantly, the leukemia persists following myeloablative radiation thus mimicking post-transplant minimal residual disease. Donor-derived, post-transplant injection of CD19 CAR T cells eliminated residual leukemia in the syngeneic as well as the allogeneic settings. CD19 CAR T cells harvested from allogeneic recipients maintained in-vitro ability to produce IFN-gamma and degranulate in the presence of ALL ex vivo, at levels comparable to syngeneic CD19 CAR T cells. However, CAR T cells administered in the allogeneic environment had the potential to mediate severe acute GVHD with early mortality of recipients not typically seen in this minor mismatch model. This occurred across multiple T cell doses capable of clearing leukemia (0.3e6-5e6), in transduced CD19 CAR T cells generated from donors tolerized to allogeneic antigens, and when CD19 CAR T cell infusion was delayed following BMT. In-vivo tracking of transferred cells showed comparable expansion and persistence of the CD19 CAR T cells in the allogeneic and syngeneic environments. However, syngeneic CAR T cells tended to develop later into central memory T cells (CD62L+CD44+), whereas the profile of allogeneic cells was significantly skewed toward effector T cells (CD62L-CD44+). Remarkably, the process of CAR-driven acute GVHD in this minor mismatch model was only seen in the presence of leukemia, indicating a CAR-target interaction influences the induction of GVHD. Indeed, pro-inflammatory cytokines IFN-gamma and IL-6 were elevated only in the presence of both ALL and CAR T cells, whereas TNF alpha levels were undetectable in all instances. We are currently testing whether neutralization of cytokines can prevent GVHD in these models. Altogether, these data demonstrate efficacy of CD19 CAR to clear residual leukemia in an immunocompetent mouse model, and maintain initial cytotoxicity despite the potentially suppressive allogeneic environment. However, we demonstrated potential risks of allogeneic CAR T cells aggravating GVHD in the presence of residual leukemia, likely via cytokine-mediated manner. Clinically, as IL-6 was shown to be significant in cytokine release syndrome, this may represent a murine model to study potential interventions. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. SCI-24-SCI-24
Author(s):  
Crystal L. Mackall

Unparalleled remission rates in patients with chemorefractory B-ALL treated with CD19-CAR T cells illustrate the potential for immunotherapy to eradicate chemoresistant cancer. CD19-CAR therapy is poised to fundamentally alter the clinical approach to relapsed B-ALL and ultimately may be incorporated into frontline therapy. Despite these successes, as clinical experience with this novel modality has increased, so has understanding of factors that limit success of CD19-CAR T cells for leukemia. These insights have implications for the future of cell based immunotherapy for leukemia and provide a glimpse of more global challenges likely to face the emerging field of cancer immunotherapy. Five challenges limiting the overall effectiveness of CD19-CAR therapy will be discussed: 1) T cell exhaustion is a differentiation pathway that occurs in T cells subjected to excessive T cell receptor signaling. A progressive functional decline occurs, manifest first by diminished proliferative potential and cytokine production, following by diminished cytolytic function and ultimately cell death. High leukemic burdens predispose CD19-CAR T cells to exhaustion as does the presence of a CD28 costimulatory signal, while a 4-1BB costimulatory signal diminishes the susceptibility to exhaustion. This biology is likely responsible for limited CD19-CAR persistence observed in clinical trials using a CD19-zeta-28 CAR compared to that observed using a CD19-zeta-BB CAR. 2) Leukemia resistance occurs in approximately 20% of patients treated with CD19-CAR and is associated with selection of B-ALL cells lacking CD19 targeted by the chimeric receptor. Emerging data demonstrates two distinct biologies associated with CD19-epitope loss. Isoform switch is characterized by an increase in CD19 isoforms specifically lacking exon 2, which binds the scFvs incorporated into CD19-CARs currently in clinical trials. Lineage switch is characterized by a global change in leukemia cell phenotype, and is associated with dedifferentiation toward a more stem-like, or myeloid leukemia in the setting of CD19-CAR for B-ALL. These insights raise the prospect that effectiveness of immunotherapy for leukemia may be significantly enhanced by targeting of more than one leukemia antigen. 3) CAR immunogenicity describes immune responses induced in the host that can lead to rejection of the CD19-CAR transduced T cells. Anti-CAR immune responses have been observed by several groups, and mapping is underway to identify the most immunogenic regions of the CAR, as a first step toward preventing this complication. 4) The most common toxicities associated with CD19-CAR therapy are cytokine release syndrome, neurotoxicity and B cell aplasia. Cytokine release syndrome is primarily observed in the setting of high disease burdens and efforts are underway to standardize grading and treatment algorithms to diminish morbidity. Increased information is needed to better understand the neurotoxicity observed in the context of this therapy. Although clinical data is limited, B cell aplasia appears to be adequately treated with IVIG replacement therapy. 5) Technical graft failure (e.g. inadequate expansion/transduction) is a challenge that has received limited attention, primarily since many trials have not reported the percentage of patients in whom adequate products could not be generated. We have observed that technical graft failure is often associated with a high frequency of contaminating myeloid populations in the lymphocyte product and selection approaches designed to eradicate myeloid populations have resulted in improved T cell expansion and transduction. These results suggest that optimization of lymphocyte selection may diminish the incidence of technical graft failure. Disclosures Mackall: Juno: Patents & Royalties: CD22-CAR. Off Label Use: cyclophosphamide.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 862-862 ◽  
Author(s):  
Partow Kebriaei ◽  
Stefan O. Ciurea ◽  
Mary Helen Huls ◽  
Harjeet Singh ◽  
Simon Olivares ◽  
...  

Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) can be curative in a subset of patients with advanced lymphoid malignancies but relapse remains a major reason for treatment failure. Donor-derived, non-specific lymphocyte infusions (DLI) can confer an immune anti-malignancy effect but can be complicated by graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD). Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-modified T cells directed toward CD19 have demonstrated dramatic efficacy in patients with refractory ALL and NHL. However, responses are often associated with life-threatening cytokine release syndrome. Aim: We hypothesized that infusing CAR-modified, CD19-specific T-cells after HCT as a directed DLI would be associated with a low rate of GVHD, better disease control, and a less severe cytokine release syndrome since administered in a minimal disease state. Methods: We employed a non-viral gene transfer using the Sleeping Beauty (SB) transposon/transposase system to stably express a CD19-specific CAR (designated CD19RCD28 that activates via CD3z & CD28) in donor-derived T cells for patients with advanced CD19+ lymphoid malignancies. T-cells were electroporated using a Nucleofector device to synchronously introduce two DNA plasmids coding for SB transposon (CD19RCD28) and hyperactive SB transposase (SB11). T-cells stably expressing the CAR were retrieved over 28 days of co-culture by recursive additions of g-irradiated activating and propagating cells (AaPC) in presence of soluble recombinant interleukin (IL)-2 and IL-21. The AaPC were derived from K562 cells and genetically modified to co-express CD19 as well as the co-stimulatory molecules CD86, CD137L, and a membrane-bound version of IL-15. Results: To date, we have successfully treated 21 patients with median age 36 years (range 21-62) with advanced CD19+ ALL (n=18) or NHL (n=3); 10 patients had active disease at time of HCT. Donor-derived CAR+ T cells (HLA-matched sibling n=10; 1 Ag mismatched sibling n=1; haplo family n=8; cord blood n=2) were infused at a median 64 days (range 42-91 days) following HCT to prevent disease progression. Transplant preparative regimens were myeloablative, busulfan-based (n=10) or reduced intensity, fludarabine-based (n=11). All patients were maintained on GVHD prophylaxis at time of CAR T-cell infusion with tacrolimus, plus mycophenolate mofeteil for cord, plus post-HCT cyclophosphamide for haplo donors. The starting CAR+ T-cell dose was 106 (n=7), escalated to 107 (n=6), 5x107 (n=5), and currently at 108 (n=3) modified T cells/m2 (based on recipient body surface area). Patients have not demonstrated any acute or late toxicity to CAR+ T cell infusions. Three patients developed acute grades 2-4 GVHD (liver n=1, upper GI n=1, skin=1) which was within the expected range after allogeneic HCT alone. Of note, the rate of CMV reactivation after CAR T cell infusion was 24% vs. 41 % previously reported for our patients without CAR T cell infusion (Wilhelm et al. J Oncol Parm Practice, 2014, 20:257). Nineteen patients have had at least 30 days follow-up post CAR T-cell infusion and are evaluable for disease progression. Forty-eight percent of patients (n=10) remain alive and in complete remission (CR) at median 5.2 months (range 0-21.3 months) following CAR T cell infusion. Importantly, among 8 patients who received haplo-HCT and CAR, 7 remain in remission at median 4.2 months. Conclusion: We demonstrate that infusing donor-derived CD19-specific CAR+ T cells, using the SB and AaPC platform, in the adjuvant HCT setting as pre-emptive DLI may provide an effective and safe approach for maintaining remission in patients at high risk for relapse. Graft-vs-host disease did not appear increased by administration of the donor derived CAR-T cells. Furthermore, the add-back of allogeneic T cells appears to have contributed to immune reconstitution and control of opportunistic viral infection. Disclosures Huls: Intrexon and Ziopharm: Employment, Equity Ownership. Singh:Intrexon and Ziopharm: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Olivares:Intrexon and Ziopharm: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Su:Ziopharm and Intrexon: Employment. Figliola:Intrexon and Ziopharm: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Kumar:Ziopharm and Intrexon: Equity Ownership. Jena:Ziopharm Oncology: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties: Potential roylaties (Patent submitted); Intrexon: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties: Potential royalties (Patent submitted). Ang:Intrexon and Ziopharm: Equity Ownership. Lee:Intrexon: Equity Ownership; Cyto-Sen: Equity Ownership; Ziopharm: Equity Ownership.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 999-999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer N. Brudno ◽  
Victoria Shi ◽  
David Stroncek ◽  
Stefania Pittaluga ◽  
Jennifer A. Kanakry ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) are fusion proteins that combine antigen-recognition domains and T-cell signaling domains. T cells genetically modified to express CARs directed against the B-cell antigen CD19 can cause remissions of B-cell malignancies. Most CARs in clinical use contain components derived from murine antibodies. Immune responses have been reported to eliminate CAR T cells in clinical trials, especially after second infusions of CAR T cells (C. Turtle et al., Journal of Clinical Investigation, 2016). These immune responses could be directed at the murine components of CARs. Such immune responses might limit the persistence of the CAR T cells, and anti-CAR immune responses might be an especially important problem if multiple infusions of CAR T cells are administered. Development of fully-human CARs could reduce recipient immune responses against CAR T cells. Methods: We designed the first fully-human anti-CD19 CAR (HuCAR-19). The CAR is encoded by a lentiviral vector. This CAR has a fully-human single-chain variable fragment, hinge and transmembrane regions from CD8-alpha, a CD28 costimulatory domain, and a CD3-zeta T-cell activation domain. We conducted a phase I dose-escalation trial with a primary objective of investigating the safety of HuCAR-19 T cells and a secondary objective of assessing anti-lymphoma efficacy. Low-dose chemotherapy was administered before HuCAR-19 T-cell infusions to enhance CAR T-cell activity. The low-dose chemotherapy consisted of cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 daily for 3 days and fludarabine 30 mg/m2 daily for 3 days on the same days as cyclophosphamide. HuCAR-19 T cells were infused 2 days after the end of the chemotherapy regimen. Patients with residual lymphoma after a first treatment were potentially eligible for repeat treatments if dose-limiting toxicities did not occur with the first treatment. Repeat infusions were given at the same dose level as the first infusion or 1 dose level higher than the first infusion. Findings: A total of 11 HuCAR-19 T-cell infusions have been administered to 9 patients; 2 patients received 2 infusions each. So far, there is an 86% overall response rate (Table). Grade 3 adverse events (AEs) included expected cytokine-release syndrome toxicities such as fever, tachycardia, and hypotension. Corticosteroids were used to treat toxicity in Patient 3. The interleukin-(IL)-6 receptor antagonist tocilizumab was used to treat toxicity in Patient 4, and both tocilizumab and corticosteroids were used to treat toxicity in Patient 8. Only 1 of 8 evaluable patients, Patient 3, has experienced significant neurological toxicity to date. This patient experienced encephalopathy that was associated with a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) white blood cell count of 165/mm3. Almost all of the CSF white cells were CAR T cells, and the CSF IL-6 level was elevated. All toxicities have resolved fully in all patients. In Patient 1, tumor biopsies revealed a complete loss of CD19 expression by lymphoma cells after 2 HuCAR-19 T-cell infusions, which to our knowledge is the first documented complete loss of CD19 expression by lymphoma after anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy. This loss of CD19 expression was associated with lymphoma progression. After first CAR-19 T-cell infusions, HuCAR-19 cells were detectable in the blood of every patient. The median peak number of blood CAR+ cells was 26/microliter (range 3 to 1005 cells/microliter). Blood HuCAR-19 cells were detected after second infusions in the blood of both patients who received second infusions. Patient 1 obtained a partial response after a second infusion after only obtaining stable disease after a first infusion. We detected elevations of inflammatory cytokines including IL-6, interferon gamma, and IL-8 in the serum of patients experiencing clinical toxicities consistent with cytokine-release syndrome. Interpretation: T cells expressing HuCAR-19 have substantial activity against advanced lymphoma, and infusions of HuCAR-19 T cells caused reversible toxicities attributable to cytokine-release syndrome. Disclosures Kochenderfer: Kite Pharma: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; bluebird bio: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding.


Author(s):  
Jeremy S. Abramson ◽  
Matthew Lunning ◽  
M. Lia Palomba

Aggressive B-cell lymphomas that are primary refractory to, or relapse after, frontline chemoimmunotherapy have a low cure rate with conventional therapies. Although high-dose chemotherapy remains the standard of care at first relapse for sufficiently young and fit patients, fewer than one-quarter of patients with relapsed/refractory disease are cured with this approach. Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have emerged as an effective therapy in patients with multiple relapsed/refractory disease, capable of inducing durable remissions in patients with chemotherapy-refractory disease. Three anti-CD19 CAR T cells for aggressive B-cell lymphoma (axicabtagene ciloleucel, tisagenlecleucel, and lisocabtagene ciloleucel) are either U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved or in late-stage development. All three CAR T cells produce durable remissions in 33%–40% of treated patients. Differences among these products include the specific CAR constructs, costimulatory domains, manufacturing process, dose, and eligibility criteria for their pivotal trials. Notable toxicities include cytokine release syndrome and neurologic toxicities, which are usually treatable and reversible, as well as cytopenias and hypogammaglobulinemia. Incidences of cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity differ across CAR T-cell products, related in part to the type of costimulatory domain. Potential mechanisms of resistance include CAR T-cell exhaustion and immune evasion, CD19 antigen loss, and a lack of persistence. Rational combination strategies with CAR T cells are under evaluation, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, immunomodulators, and tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Novel cell products are also being developed and include CAR T cells that target multiple tumor antigens, cytokine-secreting CAR T cells, and gene-edited CAR T cells, among others.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 3906 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aamir Ahmad ◽  
Shahab Uddin ◽  
Martin Steinhoff

Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy is an exciting development in the field of cancer immunology, wherein immune T-cells from patients are collected, engineered to create ‘CAR’-T cells, and infused back into the same patient. Currently, two CAR-T-cell-based therapies, Tisagenlecleucel and Axicabtagene ciloleucel, are approved by FDA for the treatment of hematological malignancies, acute lymphoblastic leukemia and large B-cell lymphomas. Their approval has been a culmination of several phase I and II clinical studies, which are the subject of discussion in this review article. Over the years, CAR-T cells have evolved to be significantly more persistent in patients’ blood, resulting in a much-improved clinical response and disease remission. This is particularly significant given that the target patient populations of these therapies are those with relapsed and refractory disease who have often progressed on multiple therapies. Despite the promising clinical results, there are still several challenges that need to be addressed. Of particular note are the associated toxicities exemplified by cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and the neurotoxicity. CRS has been addressed by an FDA-approved therapy of its own—tocilizumab. This article focuses on the progress related to CAR-T therapy: the pertinent clinical studies and their major findings, their associated adverse effects, and future perspective.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4832-4832
Author(s):  
Yinqiang Zhang ◽  
Heng Mei ◽  
Chenggong Li ◽  
Yingnan Li ◽  
Mengyi Du ◽  
...  

Abstract Background : Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells targeting CD19 have achieved great clinical responses in patients with relapsed or refractory acute B lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R B-ALL). However, severe adverse events such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity restrict it to further application. Tocilizumab against human interleukin-6 (IL-6) receptor is a common treatment for CAR-T cell therapy associated cytokine release syndrome. Corticosteroids are used when remission is not reached after the application of tocilizumab as well as neurotoxicity occurs, according to the guidance. However, their suitable timing still remains unclear when taking their efficacy and side effects into consideration. Methods: From January 2016 to July 2020, in our phase 1/2 clinical trials (NCT02965092、NCT04008251), 55 patients with R/R B-ALL were enrolled and injected with anti-CD19 CAR-T cells. Clinical laboratory tests on day 0、4、7、10、14、21、28 after infusion as well as endpoints、adverse events and treatment were recorded. CRS and neurotoxicity were graded according to American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT),and infection severity was classified as mild, moderate, severe, life-threatening, or fatal. (Young et al. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2016; 22:359-70.) Patients were assigned to four cohorts based on the fold change of IL-6 and the use of Tocilizumab. We defined fold change as the ratio of peak before Tocilizumab given to baseline in Tocilizumab group and the ratio of peak within 28 days to baseline in non- Tocilizumab group. According to the statistics, two groups were separated into high level (fold change over 5) and low level (fold change below 5), respectively. Wilcoxon tests、Log-rank tests and Fisher's exact tests were used to analyze statistics in GraphPad Prism 9. Results: During the observation period of 28-day-postinfusion, the use of Tocilizumab or corticosteroids did not significantly reduce the response rate or increase infectious risk (P>0.99, P=0.052). Doing a median follow-up of 7 months, the use of corticosteroids was significantly associated with shorter overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), while it did not appear when Tocilizumab was applied alone. In addition, significantly fold change of IL-6, IL-10 were observed among subjects suffering cytokine release syndrome before the use of Tocilizumab or corticosteroids and higher levels of TNF-α were observed in 3 subjects with mild neurotoxicity (P=0.0002, P<0.0001, P=0.0004). In high level group, patients treated with Tocilizumab had mild CRS limiting to grade 1-2, with shorter duration of CRS (median=5) than non-Tocilizumab (median=6) , though it is without significant difference (P=0.874). In low level group, the use of Tocilizumab is associated with shorter PFS(P=0.0275)as well as severe cytokine release syndrome. Two patients developed grade 4 CRS after infusing Tocilizumab,with apparently increased level of IL-10 (fold change=200) or IFN-γ (fold change=114.24). Neurotoxicity occurred in four patients in Tocilizumab group, and their IL-6 levels increased significantly after treatment, reaching an average peak of 1000pg/ml (157-22001.9). No neurotoxicity were observed in non-Tocilizumab group. Conclusion: Our study demonstrate that severe and persistent CRS could be avoided by applying Tocilizumab when IL-6 has increased over 5-fold from baseline. Tocilizumab is not recommended to use with little change of IL-6 because it fails to suppress the inflammatory response, and may trigger the activation of other cytokines and accelerate the progress of disease recurrence in patients. Although corticosteroids were associated with relapse, we still suggested that corticosteroids should be administrated to antagonize neurotoxicity with symptoms and significantly increased IL-6 levels after the infusion of Tocilizumab. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document