scholarly journals Comparative study of bacterial microfiltration in the implant‐abutment interface, with straight and conical internal connections, in vitro

Author(s):  
Larrucea V. Carlos ◽  
Navarro Carlos ◽  
Larrucea Karina ◽  
Boda Sunil ◽  
Padilla Carlos ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simonetta D'Ercole ◽  
Antonio Scarano ◽  
Vittoria Perrotti ◽  
Jorge Mulatinho ◽  
Adriano Piattelli ◽  
...  

Prevention of microbial leakage at the implant-abutment junction is a major challenge for the construction of 2-stage implants in order to minimize inflammatory reactions and to maximize bone stability at the implant neck. The aim of the present in vitro study was an evaluation of the leakage observed over a period of 28 days in Cone Morse taper internal connections and in screwed-abutments connections. In the present study 10 specimens of Cone Morse (Group 1) and 10 of internal hexagon (Group 2) implants were used. The inner parts of 5 implants per group were inoculated with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PS) suspension and 5 implants per group with Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (AA). The possible penetration of bacterial suspension into the surrounding solution was determined by the observation of turbidity of the broth. In Group 1, bacterial contamination was found in 3 out of 5 implant-abutment assemblies seeded with the PS and in 2 samples out of 5 in the assemblies seeded with AA, with a total of leaked assemblies in this group of 5 out of 10. In Group 2, bacterial contamination was found in 4 out of 5 implant-abutment assemblies seeded with the PS, and in 4 out of 5 samples seeded with AA, with a total of leaked assemblies of 8 out of 10. The present data confirm the reported high permeability to bacterial leakage of screw-retained abutment connections, and the lower infiltration rates—although not significantly—of Cone Morse taper internal connections.



2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 158-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Antonio Deconto ◽  
Alexander DAlvia Salvoni ◽  
Thomaz Wassall


1999 ◽  
Vol 81 (5) ◽  
pp. 574-578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Gross ◽  
Dan Kozak ◽  
Ben-Zion Laufer ◽  
Ervin I. Weiss


2009 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadja Larsen ◽  
Kim F. Michaelsen ◽  
Anders Pærregaard ◽  
Finn K. Vogensen ◽  
Mogens Jakobsen


2014 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 633-639 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erica Dorigatti de Avila ◽  
Fernanda de Matos Moraes ◽  
Sabrina Maria Castanharo ◽  
Marcelo Antonialli Del'Acqua ◽  
Francisco de Assis Mollo

Because there is no consensus in the literature about the need for a splint between copings, the aim of this study was to evaluate, in vitro, the accuracy of 2 impression techniques for implant-supported prostheses. A master cast was fabricated with four parallel implant abutment analogs and a passive framework. Two groups with 5 casts each were formed: Group 1 (squared impression copings with no splint: S) and Group 2 (splinted squared impression copings, using metal drill burs and Pattern resin: SS). The impression material used was polyvinyl siloxane with open trays for standard preparation of the casts. For each cast, the framework was positioned, and a titanium screw was tightened with 10 N·cm torque in analog A, after which measurements of the abutment-framework interface gaps were performed at analogs C and D. This process was repeated for analog D. These measurements were analyzed using software. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a confidence interval of 95% was used to analyze the data. Significant differences were detected between S and SS in relation to the master cast (P ≤ 0.05). The median values of the abutment-framework interface gaps were as follows: master cast: 39.64 μm; squared impression copings with no splint: 205.86 μm; splinted squared impression copings: 99.19 μm. Under the limitations of this study, the technique presented for Group 2 produces better results compared with the technique used for Group 1.





Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 385
Author(s):  
Igor Smojver ◽  
Marko Vuletić ◽  
Dražena Gerbl ◽  
Ana Budimir ◽  
Mato Sušić ◽  
...  

The microenvironment of the oral cavity is altered when an implant, a biocompatible foreign body, is inserted into the mouth. Bacteria settle in the tissues in and around the implant due to the passage of microorganisms through the microgap at the connection of the implant and prosthetic abutment. To prevent colonization of the implant by microorganisms, one idea is to use sealing and antimicrobial materials to decontaminate the implant–abutment interface and close the microgap. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the antimicrobial efficacy and permeability of different types of sealing materials at the implant–abutment interface, under static conditions. Three different sealing material (GapSeal gel, Oxysafe gel and Flow.sil) were used for sealing the implant–abutment interfaces in 60 titanium dental implants, which were first contaminated with a solution containing Staphylococcus aureus and Candida albicans for 14 days under an aerobic condition. Results showed that a complete seal against bacterial infection was not formed at the implant–abutment interface, while for fungal infections, only GapSeal material helped to prevent microleakage. Findings of this in vitro study reported that application of sealing material before abutment connection may reduce peri-implant bacterial and fungal population compared with the interface without sealing material.



1985 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 457-464
Author(s):  
C von Schacky ◽  
W Siess ◽  
S Fischer ◽  
P C Weber


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document