Psychometric properties of the Community Violence‐Prevention Activation Measure (CV‐PAM): Evaluating provider activation toward community violence prevention

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 545-561
Author(s):  
Sonya Mathies Dinizulu ◽  
Liza M. Suarez ◽  
David Simpson ◽  
Jaleel Abdul‐Adil ◽  
Kristen C. Jacobson
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Kohlbeck ◽  
T deRoon-Cassini ◽  
M Levas ◽  
S Hargarten ◽  
C Kostelac ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilene Hyman ◽  
Mandana Vahabi ◽  
Annette Bailey ◽  
Sejal Patel ◽  
Sepali Guruge ◽  
...  

Background Violence is a critical public health problem associated with compromised health and social suffering that are preventable. The Centre for Global Health and Health Equity organized a forum in 2014 to identify: (1) priority issues related to violence affecting different population groups in Canada, and (2) strategies to take action on priority issues to reduce violence-related health inequities in Canada. In this paper, we present findings from the roundtable discussions held at the Forum, offer insights on the socio-political implications of these findings, and provide recommendations for action to reduce violence through research, policy and practice. Methods Over 60 academic researchers, health and social service agency staff, community advocates and graduate students attended the daylong Forum, which included presentations on structural violence, community violence, gender-based violence, and violence against marginalized groups. Detailed notes taken at the roundtables were analyzed by the first author using a thematic analysis technique. Findings The thematic analysis identified four thematic areas: 1) structural violence perpetuates interpersonal violence - the historical, social, political and economic marginalization that contributes to personal and community violence. 2) social norms of gender-based violence—the role of dominant social norms in perpetuating the practice of violence, especially towards women, children and older adults; 3) violence prevention and mitigation programs—the need for policy and programming to address violence at the individual/interpersonal, community, and societal levels; and 4) research gaps—the need for comprehensive research evidence made up of systematic reviews, community-based intervention and evaluation of implementation research to identify effective programming to address violence. Conclusions The proceedings from the Global Health and Health Equity Forum underscored the importance of recognizing violence as a public health issue that requires immediate and meaningful communal and structural investment to break its historic cycles. Based on our thematic analysis and literature review, four recommendations are offered: (1) Support and adopt policies to prevent or reduce structural violence; (2) Adopt multi-pronged strategies to transform dominant social norms associated with violence; (3) Establish standards and ensure adequate funding for violence prevention programs and services; and (4) Fund higher level ecological research on violence prevention and mitigation.


2007 ◽  
Vol 78 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamela A. Geller ◽  
Richard Neugebauer ◽  
A. Kyle Possemato ◽  
Patricia Walter ◽  
E. Steven Dummit ◽  
...  

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 94 (4) ◽  
pp. 608-616
Author(s):  
Ronald G. Slaby ◽  
Peter Stringham

Pediatric practitioners can play a pivotal preventative role in helping their young patients to lower their risk of becoming involved in peer and community violence by developing a sound program and implementing specific preventative treatments. The recommendations presented here are derived from the integration of two sources: (1) research evidence on children's involvement with peer violence as aggressors, victims, bystanders who support violence, nonviolent problem-solvers, gender-role-related participants, or witnesses to community violence; and (2) the practical experience of developing a pediatric violence prevention program in a neighborhood health center over the last 12 years. To develop a sound violence prevention program, it is recommended that pediatricians (1) define violence as a major health problem that can be prevented, (2) develop a thorough knowledge of both the factors underlying violence and the misleading popular myths regarding violence, (3) adopt a clear strategy by which to organize and focus these findings in the service of creating behavioral change, and (4) build collaborative partnerships with community leaders and violence prevention researchers to enhance the value of their clinical interventions. To implement specific treatments to reduce children's risk of involvement with violence, it is recommended that pediatricians (1) take a thorough history of children's involvement with violence as an aggressor, a victim, a bystander, a nonviolent problem-solver, a participant in gender-role-related violence, and a witness to violence in the community; (2) educate children and their parents about the ways of reducing their risks by helping them to develop habits of thought and behavior patterns that lead to effective and nonviolent problem solving; (3) provide follow-up support for the changes children and their parents make to help prevent violence; and (4) engage in community outreach activities designed to change community norms about violence. By intervening early, systematically, and repeatedly in the lives of young children and their communities, pediatricians can help children develop the habits of thought they need to protect themselves from violence and to take active measures to prevent future involvement with violence.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document