Computational approach to radiogenomics of breast cancer: Luminal A and luminal B molecular subtypes are associated with imaging features on routine breast MRI extracted using computer vision algorithms

2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 902-907 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lars J. Grimm ◽  
Jing Zhang ◽  
Maciej A. Mazurowski
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Computer Vision ◽  
Molecular Subtypes ◽  
Breast Mri ◽  
Computational Approach ◽  
Imaging Features ◽  
Luminal A ◽  
Luminal B

scholarly journals Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer: A Review for Breast Radiologists

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen S Johnson ◽  
Emily F Conant ◽  
Mary Scott Soo
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Molecular Subtypes ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Imaging Features ◽  
Luminal A ◽  
Luminal B ◽  
Her2 Breast Cancer ◽  
Er Expression

Abstract Gene expression profiling has reshaped our understanding of breast cancer by identifying four molecular subtypes: (1) luminal A, (2) luminal B, (3) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-enriched, and (4) basal-like, which have critical differences in incidence, response to treatment, disease progression, survival, and imaging features. Luminal tumors are most common (60%–70%), characterized by estrogen receptor (ER) expression. Luminal A tumors have the best prognosis of all subtypes, whereas patients with luminal B tumors have significantly shorter overall and disease-free survival. Distinguishing between these tumors is important because luminal B tumors require more aggressive treatment. Both commonly present as irregular masses without associated calcifications at mammography; however, luminal B tumors more commonly demonstrate axillary involvement at diagnosis. HER2-enriched tumors are characterized by overexpression of the HER2 oncogene and low-to-absent ER expression. HER2+ disease carries a poor prognosis, but the development of anti-HER2 therapies has greatly improved outcomes for women with HER2+ breast cancer. HER2+ tumors most commonly present as spiculated masses with pleomorphic calcifications or as calcifications alone. Basal-like cancers (15% of all invasive breast cancers) predominate among “triple negative” cancers, which lack ER, progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 expression. Basal-like cancers are frequently high-grade, large at diagnosis, with high rates of recurrence. Although imaging commonly reveals irregular masses with ill-defined or spiculated margins, some circumscribed basal-like tumors can be mistaken for benign lesions. Incorporating biomarker data (histologic grade, ER/PR/HER2 status, and multigene assays) into classic anatomic TNM staging can better inform clinical management of this heterogeneous disease.

scholarly journals Is There a Correlation between Multiparametric Assessment in Ultrasound and Intrinsic Subtype of Breast Cancer?

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (22) ◽  
pp. 5394
Author(s):  
Magdalena Gumowska ◽  
Joanna Mączewska ◽  
Piotr Prostko ◽  
Katarzyna Roszkowska-Purska ◽  
Katarzyna Dobruch-Sobczak
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Molecular Subtypes ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Molecular Profile ◽  
Her2 Overexpression ◽  
Imaging Features ◽  
Luminal A ◽  
Luminal B ◽  
Post Surgery

Molecular profile of breast cancer provides information about its biological activity, prognosis and treatment strategies. The purpose of our study was to investigate the correlation between ultrasound features and molecular subtypes of breast cancer. From June 2019 to December 2019, 86 patients (median age 57 years; range 32–88) with 102 breast cancer tumors were included in the study. The molecular subtypes were classified into five types: luminal A (LA), luminal B without HER2 overexpression (LB HER2−), luminal B with HER2 overexpression (LB HER2+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2+) and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Histopathological verification was obtained in core biopsy or/and post-surgery specimens in all cases. Univariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the association between the subtypes and ultrasound imaging features. Experienced radiologists assessed lesions according to the BIRADS-US lexicon. The ultrasound scans were performed with a Supersonic Aixplorer and Supersonix. Based on histopathological verification, the rates of LA, LB HER2−, LB HER2+, HER2+, and TNBC were 33, 17, 17, 16, 19, respectively. Both LB HER2+ and HER2+ subtypes presented higher incidence of calcification (OR = 3.125, p = 0.02, CI 0.0917–5.87) and HER2+ subtype presented a higher incidence of posterior enhancement (OR = 5.75, p = 0.03, CI 1.2257–32.8005), compared to other subtypes. The calcifications were less common in TNBC (OR = 0.176, p = 0.0041, CI 0.0469–0.5335) compared to other subtypes. There were no differences with regard to margin, shape, orientation, elasticity values and vascularity among five molecular subtypes. Our results suggest that there is a correlation between ultrasonographic features assessed according to BIRADS-US lexicon and BC subtypes with HER2 overexpression (both LB HER2+ and HER2+). It may be useful for identification of these aggressive subtypes of breast cancer.

scholarly journals Inflammatory Breast Cancer: Clinical Characteristics and Influence of Molecular Subtypes on Treatment Response

2021 ◽  
Vol 107 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12-12
Author(s):  
D Aissaoui ◽  
M Bohli ◽  
R Ben Amor ◽  
J Yahyaoui ◽  
A Hamdoun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Treatment Response ◽  
Inflammatory Breast Cancer ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Molecular Subtypes ◽  
Luminal A ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Luminal B ◽  
Significant Difference

Introduction: Inflammatory Breast Cancer (IBC) is a rare and very aggressive breast cancer with poor prognosis. The prevalence is different from a country to another. In Tunisia, it is about 5 to 7% of breast cancer. The aim of this study is to describe the epidemiological and histopathological features of patients with inflammatory breast cancer and to evaluate the treatment response according to the molecular subtypes. Methods: This retrospective review identified 31 patients with no metastatic IBC treated in our radiotherapy department between December 2019 and November 2020. IBC was confirmed using the clinical criteria. Baseline clinic-pathological and treatment information was retrieved from medical records. Statistical analysis was performed with IBM SPSS V.20. Results: Median age was 51.3 years [27-68]. 48% of tumors were grade 3. The average tumor size was 36mm [10-90]. The histological type was ductal carcinoma in 97%. Vascular invasion was noted in 24 patients (77%). Thirty patients were classified as stage IIIB and one patient was IIIC. 74% were hormone receptor positive and 45% were HER2 positive. Luminal B was the predominant subtype (52%) followed by Her2 positive (32%), Luminal A (23%), and triple negative (3%) All patients had chemotherapy: neoadjuvant for 26 patients (84%) and adjuvant for 5 patients (16%). Nine patients (29%) had tumor pathological complete response (pCR). Partial response was observed in 18 patients (58%). Lymph node pCR was noted in 16% of cases (n=5). Endocrine therapy and trastuzumab were given to 76% and 45% of patients, respectively. The influence of the molecular subtype was not statistically significant on the response to neoadjuvant treatment. The highest rate of pCR were 43% for Her2positive, then 27%, 21% and 9% for Luminal B, Luminal A and Triple negative, respectively (p=0.2). Conclusion: Our study showed a high percentage of hormone receptor and Her2+ (74% and 45% respectively) in IBC. Luminal B was the most frequent subtype. Anthracycline-based chemotherapy and trastuzumab improved the pCR rate: 44% for Her2positive. Triple negative showed poorer pCR than other breast cancer subtype without a significant difference. A larger study is warranted to confirm our findings.

scholarly journals Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Different Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Breast Care ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Hans-Jonas Meyer ◽  
Andreas Wienke ◽  
Alexey Surov
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Diffusion Weighted Imaging ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Molecular Subtypes ◽  
Luminal A ◽  
Diagnose Breast Cancer ◽  
Luminal B ◽  
Diffusion Weighted ◽  
Adc Values

Background: Magnetic resonance imaging can be used to diagnose breast cancer (BC).Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) can be used to reflect tumor microstructure. Objectives: This analysis aimed to compare ADC values between molecular subtypes of BC based on a large sample of patients. Method: The MEDLINE library and Scopus database were screened for the associations between ADC and molecular subtypes of BC up to April 2020. The primary end point of the systematic review was the ADC value in different BC subtypes. Overall, 28 studies were included. Results: The included studies comprised a total of 2,990 tumors. Luminal A type was diagnosed in 865 cases (28.9%), luminal B in 899 (30.1%), human epidermal growth factor receptor (Her2)-enriched in 597 (20.0%), and triple-negative in 629 (21.0%). The mean ADC values of the subtypes were as follows: luminal A: 0.99 × 10–3 mm2/s (95% CI 0.94–1.04), luminal B: 0.97 × 10–3 mm2/s (95% CI 0.89–1.05), Her2-enriched: 1.02 × 10–3 mm2/s (95% CI 0.95–1.08), and triple-negative: 0.99 × 10–3 mm2/s (95% CI 0.91–1.07). Conclusions: ADC values cannot be used to discriminate between molecular subtypes of BC.

Association between molecular subtype of local advanced breast cancer with Ca 15-3 level

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Dony Ruswendro ◽  
Salman Ardi Syamsu ◽  
Rudy Thabry ◽  
Arifin Seweng ◽  
Andi Nilawati Usman
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Tumor Marker ◽  
Molecular Subtypes ◽  
Locally Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Tissue Growth ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Luminal A ◽  
Luminal B

BACKGROUND: Neoplasm is an abnormal mass of tissue that grows excessively and not coordinated with normal tissue growth and continues to do so even though the stimulation that triggered the change has stopped. Breast cancer can be known by using tumor marker, which has been used is mucin-like glycoprotein Carcinoma Antigen (CA 15-3) which is a tumor marker that is specific to breast cancer. METHOD: This study is a cross-sectional study to determine the association between molecular subtypes of locally advanced breast cancer with CA 15-3 level at Abdul Wahab Sjahranie Samarinda Hospital. The population in this study were all breast cancer patients that were confirmed by histopathological examination. RESULTS: A total of 75 patients were included for this study, 29 patients (38.7%) known as Overexpression HER2, 18 patients (24.0%) were Luminal B with HER2 (+), 11 patients (14.7%) were Luminal B with HER2 (−), 11 patients (14.7%) were Basal-like/TNBC, and 6 patients (8,0%) were Luminal A. From the ANOVA test, the value of p = 0.045 (p < 0.05) means there was an association between Ca 15-3 level and molecular subtypes in patients with locally advanced breast cancer at the Abdul Wahab Sjahranie Hospital in Samarinda 2017. In this study Ca 15-3 levels were obtained on average for Luminal A 16.98 U/mL, Luminal B with HER2 (−) 42.41 U/mL, Luminal B with HER2 (+) 73.75 U/mL, Overexpression HER2 47.73 U/mL, and Basal Like /TNBC 63.50 U/mL. CONCLUSION: Statistically, it was found that there was an association between Ca 15-3 levels and molecular subtypes in patients with locally advanced breast cancer at the Abdul Wahab Sjahranie Hospital in Samarinda 2017.

Trends in breast cancer mortality according to molecular subtypes: A population-based study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 572-572
Author(s):  
Yunan Han ◽  
Shuai Xu ◽  
Graham A. Colditz ◽  
Adetunji T. Toriola
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Mortality ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Molecular Subtypes ◽  
Breast Cancer Mortality ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Luminal A ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Mortality Trends ◽  
Luminal B

572 Background: Breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in U.S. women. On the molecular level, breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease. Heterogeneous expressions of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) are etiologically and clinically meaningful, as they map to distinct risk factors and different treatment strategies. Although breast cancer mortality has been declining since 1990, little is known about mortality trends according to molecular subtypes at the population level. Methods: We examined the incidence-based mortality rates and trends among women who were diagnosed with invasive breast cancer from 2010 through 2017 using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. We defined incidence-based mortality using a moving 5-year calendar period starting in 2014. We further assessed mortality according to breast cancer molecular subtypes: luminal A (ER and/or PR positive, HER2 negative), luminal B (ER and/or PR positive, HER2 positive), HER2-enriched (HER2 over-expressed or amplified, ER and PR negative) and triple-negative (ER and PR negative, HER2 negative) tumors. We calculated annual percent changes (APC) in incidence-based mortality using joinpoint regression models. Results: Overall, incidence-based mortality for breast cancer significantly decreased by 1.5% annually from 2014 through 2017 (APC, -1.5%; 95% coefficient interval [CI], -2.3% to -0.7%; p<0.001). Incidence-based mortality decreased annually by 2.0% for luminal A breast cancer (APC, -2.0%; 95% CI, -3.7% to -0.3%; p<0.001), 2.1% for luminal B breast cancer (APC, -2.1%; 95% CI, -5.4% to 1.4%; p=0.1), 1.1% for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (APC, -1.1%; 95% CI, -2.1% to -0.0%; p<0.001). However, incidence-based mortality for HER2-enriched breast cancer increased 2.3% annually during the study period (APC, 2.3%; 95% CI, -2.4% to 7.2%; p=0.2). Conclusions: Between 2014 and 2017, incidence-based mortality for luminal A, luminal B, and TNBC decreased among U.S. women, with a larger decrease observed for luminal tumors. However, incidence-based mortality for HER2-enriched breast cancer increased. The favorable incidence-based mortality trends for luminal tumors and TNBC are likely due to the continuing improvement in treatments and early detection. The increasing trend of incidence-based mortality for HER2-enriched breast cancer constitutes a priority for cancer control activities and further research.

Expression of BCRP/ABCG2 Protein in Invasive Breast Cancer and Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Shou Zhang ◽  
Chao Yang ◽  
Lei Han ◽  
Lei Liu ◽  
Yun Jiang Liu
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Breast Carcinoma ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Molecular Subtypes ◽  
Therapy Response ◽  
Luminal A ◽  
Luminal B ◽  
Response To Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Background: Breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), or ABCG2 (ATP-binding cassette sub-family G member 2), is an ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter that mediates energy-dependent transport of substrate drugs out of the cell. Its overexpression may contribute to intrinsic drug resistance in vitro. However, the current literature has not yet clarified the clinical significance of BCRP/ABCG2 in invasive breast carcinoma. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to validate the expression of BCRP/ABCG2 in invasive breast carcinoma and its role in response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: In this study, a pretherapeutic core biopsy was performed in 222 patients. BCRP/ABCG2 expression in carcinoma tissue was measured by immunohistochemistry. BCRP/ABCG2 expression correlations with clinicopathological features, molecular subtypes, and therapy response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were investigated. Results: The results showed that BCRP/ABCG2 was expressed in different molecular subtypes. The proportions of patients with high BCRP/ABCG2 expression were similar in luminal A and luminal B tumors (Luminal B, 80%; Luminal A, 78%), compared with other molecular subtypes (Triple-negative, 63%; HER-2+, 58%. P=0.05). BCRP/ABCG2 expression and the number of lymphatic metastases (&#119875;=0.001) and tumor size (&#119875;=0.011) demonstrated a statistically significant correlation. Low BCRP/ABCG2 expression was associated with an increased pathological complete response (pCR) rate of 38%, higher than the 19% in tumors with high BCRP/ABCG2 expression (P=0.002). In multivariable analysis, BCRP/ABCG2 and hormone receptor (HR) expression were identified as independent risk factors of pCR (P=0.003, P=0.013. respectively). Conclusions: BCRP/ABCG2 is highly expressed in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. High BCRP/ABCG2 expression is associated with lymphatic metastasis, tumor size, and poor pCR. BCRP/ABCG2 may be a novel potential biomarker that can predict clinical progression and therapy response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Survival profile in breast cancer molecular subtypes without systemic and locoregional treatment.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11599-11599
Author(s):  
Sherry X. Yang ◽  
Eric Polley
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Molecular Subtypes ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Locoregional Therapy ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Luminal A ◽  
Luminal B

11599 Background: It is unclear whether survival varies among breast cancer molecular subtypes without systemic and locoregional therapy. This study aims to evaluate the survival profile by molecular subtypes after surgery. Methods: In total, we evaluated 301 women with invasive breast cancer with stage I, II or III disease. Patients were classified into four major breast cancer subtypes by immunohistochemistry/FISH classifiers: luminal-A (ER+ and/or PR+/HER2-), luminal-B (ER+ and/or PR+/HER2+), HER2-enriched (HER2+/ER-/PR-) or basal-like (ER-/PR-/HER2-; triple-negative). Overall survival (OS) was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier analysis, and log-rank test for differences. Association between clinical outcome and subtype adjusting for breast cancer prognostic factors was assessed by multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. Results: All patients did not receive systemic chemotherapy and hormone therapy as well as radiation therapy. Luminal A was the most common subtype (N = 224), followed by basal-like (N = 43), luminal B (N = 21) and HER2-enriched (N = 13). Median follow-up for OS was 197 months (range: 1 – 273 months). Age at diagnosis was statistically different among the subtypes, with basal-like and luminal B having high proportions less than 50 years (P = 0.047). Patients with basal-like and HER2-enriched had more high grade tumors (P < 0.001). Notably, there was no difference in OS among the four subtypes (log-rank P = 0.983). In multivariable analysis, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) was 1.1 for luminal A vs. luminal B (P = 0.781), 0.62 in luminal A vs. HER2-enriched (P = 0.273), or 0.67 in luminal A vs. basal-like (P = 0.158). In contrast, the adjusted HR were 2.2 in age less than 50 years (P = 0.0017), and 1.1 for number of positive nodes (P = 0.00074). Conclusions: OS, through long-term clinical follow-up, is not significantly different among molecular subtypes if not controlling for other prognostic factors in patients who only received surgery. Age and number of positive nodes are independent prognostic factors in patients with no systemic and locoregional treatments.

Breast cancer molecular subtypes association with clinical outcomes and race.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12575-e12575 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramses F. Sadek ◽  
Li fang Zhang ◽  
Houssein Talal Abdul Sater
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Black Women ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Molecular Subtypes ◽  
Molecular Subtype ◽  
Cancer Stage ◽  
Luminal A ◽  
Luminal B ◽  
Race Disparity

e12575 Background: Breast Cancer (BC) has been classified into four subtypes: Luminal A (LABC), Luminal B (LBBC), Triple negative (TNBC) and HER2-enriched (HER2e). BC mortality in Black women is significantly higher than in Whites and Asians. BC in Blacks has been characterized by higher grade and later stage. Causes of the Black-White BC survival disparity have been investigated, including differences in: diagnostic stage, socioeconomics, and comorbidities. These have led researchers to investigate the differences in tumor molecular subtype and their association with clinical outcomes and races. Methods: This study used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results – 18 (SEER-18) Registries research data between 2010 and 2013 that included over 212,000 patients. Descriptive statistics, Odds ratios (OR) and 95%Confidence intervals (CI) were used to study the association between BC stage, grade, and mortality and BC molecular subtypes across different races. We employed Cox regression models to explore the race disparity in BC mortality before and after controlling for BC molecular subtype and other clinical and social factors. Results: TNBC had more high grade cancer compared to HER2e subtype (OR, 1.5; CI, 1.3 - 1.8), LBBC (OR, 4.5; CI, 4.0 - 5.0) and LABC (OR, 12.2; CI, 11.2 – 13.3) for Black. BC mortality was higher in TNBC subtype compared to HER2e subtype (OR, 1.3; CI, 1.1 - 1.6), LBBC (OR, 2.4; CI, 2.0 - 2.9), and LABC (OR, 2.8; CI, 2.4 – 3.2) for Blacks. Results are consistent for all races. HER2e subtype had more late cancer stage compare to LBBC (OR, 1.2; CI, 1.0 - 1.4), TNBC (OR, 1.4; CI, 1.2 - 1.6) and LABC (OR, 2.1; CI, 1.8 - 2.4) in Blacks with similar results in all races. BC mortality in Blacks was higher compare with Whites (HR, 1.9; CI, 1.8 - 2.0) and Asian (HR, 2.7; CI, 2.5 - 3.0). After controlling for cancer subtype and other factors in the Cox regression model, the corresponding HRs ware significantly decreased to 1.2 (CI, 1.1 -1.3) and 1.6 (9CI, 1.5 -1.8). Blacks have heighst percent in stage IV and grade higer grade of disease. Conclusions: Molecular subtypes of BC contribute differently to risks of late cancer stage, high cancer grade and BC specific mortality. These differences are consistent in all races. The molecular subtypes and other social and clinical factors may explain part of the BC mortality race disparity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document