The Difference in Medial Meniscal Extrusion between Non‐Weight‐Bearing and Weight‐Bearing Positions in People with and without Medial Compartment Knee Osteoarthritis

PM&R ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob H. Reisner ◽  
John M. Franco ◽  
John H. Hollman ◽  
Adam C. Johnson ◽  
Jacob L. Sellon ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2_suppl2) ◽  
pp. 2325967117S0007
Author(s):  
Ali Engin Daştan ◽  
Elcil Kaya Biçer ◽  
Hüseyin Kaya ◽  
Emin Taşkıran

Aim: Medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) causes meniscal extrusion, loss of meniscus function, arthritic changes. Clinical history, physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings are useful for the diagnosis of MMPRT. The aim of this study is to evaluate the utility of stress X-rays in the diagnosis of MMPRT. Methods: Twenty patients who had undergone high tibial osteotomy between March 2015 and May 2016 and whose preoperative bilateral varus and valgus stress x-rays (Telos device) along with weight bearing x-rays were available were included. These patients were grouped into two according to integrity of posterior roots of their medial menisci; there were ten patients both in the study and control groups. Lateral joint space width (LJW) on varus stress x-rays, medial joint space width (MJW) on valgus stress x-rays as well as LJW and MJW on weight bearing x-rays were measured bilaterally. Intragroup comparisons of joint space widths between index and opposite knees were performed. Differences of MJW and LJW between index and opposite knees were calculated. Differences of joint space widths between stress x-rays and weight bearing x-rays were also calculated. The changes in joint space widths between the two groups were compared. Statistical analyses were performed utilizing SPSS 18.0. Significance level was set at 0.05. Results: In MMPRT group, opening of LJ space of index knees under varus stress was greater than that of opposite knees (Index: (mean±SD) 10,27±1,17 mm, opposite: 8,61±1,37 mm; p<0,0001). In the control group the difference was not significant (Index: 9,29±2,55 mm, opposite: 9,68±1,44 mm; p=0,566). The difference in the opening of LJW (under varus stress) between index and opposite knees was significantly greater in the study group (p=0,013). The difference between LJW under weight-bearing and varus stress conditions was significantly greater in the study group. (Study: 3,64±0.217 mm, control:2,28±0,182 mm, p=0.018). Conclusions: The findings of this study showed that in patients who had MMPRTs, an increased opening in the LJW was observed under varus stress conditions. This may be relevant with the fact that when varus stress is applied, meniscal extrusion is increased in case of a MMPRT. Stress x-rays could be a useful tool in the diagnosis of MMPRTs. Further studies are needed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of this diagnostic tool.


2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 640-646 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yosuke Ishii ◽  
Masakazu Ishikawa ◽  
Hiroshi Kurumadani ◽  
Seiju Hayashi ◽  
Atsuo Nakamae ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Jennifer C. Erhart ◽  
Anne Mündermann ◽  
Seungbum Koo ◽  
Ben Merrick ◽  
Andrew Deagon ◽  
...  

Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee affects an estimated 20–40% of individuals over the age of 65 [1], and is nearly 10 times more common in the medial compartment than the lateral compartment [2]. Plain radiography measurements using the Kellgren and Lawrence (KL) scale have been the gold standard for diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis [3]. However, for new treatment interventions for medial compartment knee OA such as load modifying footwear, it would be important to know if the disease-related cartilage loss in the medial compartment occurs initially and predominantly in regions that are weight bearing during walking. Because walking results in highest weight bearing occurring in the anterior and middle regions of the femoral condyle and the anterior region of the tibial plateau, seeing a pattern of thinning in these areas would suggest that walking is an important activity for understanding both the cause and treatment of osteoarthritis.


2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianhao Lin ◽  
Rujun Li ◽  
Xiaozheng Kang ◽  
Hu Li

Objective. To investigate the risk factors of radiographic tibiafemoral knee osteoarthritis (OA).Methods. A population-based cross-sectional survey was conducted in Wuchuan County. A questionnaire and bilateral weight-bearing posterior-anterior semi-flexed knee radiographs were completed and read for Kellgren and Lawrence (K/L) grade and joint space narrowing (JSN; 0–3 scale) in each compartment. An logistic regression analysis was performed for radiographic tibiafemoral, lateral compartment, and medial compartment knee OA, respectively. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.Results. Age, sex, and knee injury were strongly associated with tibiafemoral, lateral and medial compartment knee OA. BMI also had a dose-response relationship with them. Physical activity level, and physical activity exposure at work, not significantly though, were associated with an elevated risk for this three kinds of knee OA.Conclusions. Physical activity exposure increased the risk of knee OA. It was likely to be the heavier physical activity in Wuchuan osteoarthritis study that counteracted the BMI gap compared with the Beijing and the Framingham OA study. We verified that Chinese had a more valgus alignment of the knee compared with Caucasian population, and this provide a possible explanation why Chinese have a higher prevalence of lateral compartment OA.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1738.2-1739
Author(s):  
G. Gerganov ◽  
T. Georgiev ◽  
T. Shivacheva

Background:Osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of disability worldwide and pain is its cardinal symptom. Ranging from structural injuries to central sensitization, multifactorial mechanisms play an important role in pain perception in patients with knee OA (KOA) defining a discrepancy between pain and structural damage. Imaging modalities such as radiography and musculoskeletal ultrasonography may assess those structural findings and both are well embedded in routine clinical practice. However, their association with pain severity is poorly studied.Objectives:To evaluate the place of X-ray- and ultrasound-derived parameters of structural damage for pain perception in knee osteoarthritis patients.Methods:Sixty-four knees from 38 patients with KOA fulfilling the ACR criteria were assessed. The pain severity was evaluated in all knees by 100-millimeters (mm) visual analogue scale (VAS). Anteroposterior radiographs of the fully extended knees in an upright weight-bearing position were obtained and images were evaluated according to the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) and OARSI atlas. All patients were investigated with a portable MyLab 25 Gold system equipped with an LA435 transducer (Esaote SpA, Genoa, Italy) by two experienced ultrasonographers. The presence or absence of synovial thickening, effusion in the suprapatellar bursa, and popliteal cyst were assessed. Medial meniscal extrusion and medial and lateral femoral cartilage thickness (medial and lateral) were measured in mm in full extension and flexion position, respectively. Femoral osteophytes were semi-quantitatively scored using a scale consisted of four grades (0-3).Results:The levels of pain differed significantly in the KL groups (p = .001) and in the groups classified according to the medial tibiofemoral compartment narrowing defined in line with the OARSI atlas (p = .005). The other knee osteoarthritis radiographic characteristics derived from the OARSI atlas did not correlate with the pain. From the assessed ultrasound parameters, medial meniscal extrusion and medial femoral cartilage showed a weak correlation with pain levels (r = .254, p = .043; r = -.265, p = 0.034, respectively). Nevertheless, in the multivariate analysis after adjusting for age and BMI, both variables did not reach significance for explaining the differences in VAS levels. No association between the presence of synovial effusion and popliteal cyst and pain severity was found.Conclusion:Plain radiography and ultrasonography reflect different structural changes in osteoarthritis that may play an important role in pain perception. Both imaging modalities can complement each other in order to improve the evaluation of the patient with KOA.Acknowledgments:NoneDisclosure of Interests:None declared


2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 230949902199606
Author(s):  
Takeshi Mochizuki ◽  
Koichiro Yano ◽  
Katsunori Ikari ◽  
Ken Okazaki

Purpose: This study investigated the clinical effects of different patellar components without being affected by the femoral component design in total knee arthritis (TKA) for patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Methods: In total, 48 patients with OA who met the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology for OA were enrolled and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to two groups according to the usage of patellar component design for TKA (medialized dome type [dome group] or medialized anatomic type [anatomic group]). To evaluate the clinical outcomes for TKA, knee range of motion (ROM), pain intensity of 0–100 mm visual analog scale (pain VAS), and the Japanese Knee Osteoarthritis Measure (JKOM) score were obtained at baseline and year 1. Results: The difference in knee ROM, pain VAS, or total JKOM score at year 1 was not significant between the dome and anatomic groups ( p = 0.398, 0.733 and 0.536, respectively). Moreover, similar results were obtained for changes in knee ROM, pain VAS, or total JKOM scores from baseline. In both groups, the pain VAS and total JKOM scores were significantly improved at year 1. Conclusion: Both dome and anatomic groups in TKA are significantly effective for pain and function using the JKOM score. However, their efficacy did not differ, according to the JKOM score. Results of this study are rare information focusing on the patellar component design and provide one of the insights into the TKA clinical management.


2020 ◽  
Vol 54 (S1) ◽  
pp. 47-51
Author(s):  
Najmul Huda ◽  
Mir Shahid ul Islam ◽  
Hemant Kumar ◽  
Ajay Pant ◽  
Sandeep Bishnoi

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Tariq Rafiq ◽  
Mohamad Shariff Abdul Hamid ◽  
Eliza Hafiz ◽  
Khalid Rashid ◽  
Farid Ahmad Chaudhary

Introduction: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a weight-bearing joint disease and is more common in overweight and obese persons. The objective of this study was to determine the role of rehabilitation exercises (REs) of lower limbs on weight, functional strength, and exercise adherence in overweight and obese knee OA patients. Materials And Method: The patients were recruited from the Urban community of Lahore, Pakistan. The patients were divided into the rehabilitation group (RG) and control group (CG). The patients in the RG performed the REs of lower limbs and followed the instructions of daily care (IDC), while the patients in the CG only followed the IDC for 12 weeks. Outcome measures were assessed at pre-test before grouping and post-test after 12-weeks of interventions. The measures included: weight, functional strength, and exercise adherence. The Paired Samples t-test (for the normally distributed data) and the Wilcoxon Signed Ranked Test (for the data that was not normally distributed) were used to analyze the differences within groups from pre to post-test measurements. The analysis of variance 2 × 2 factors and the Mann-Whitney U-test were used to analyze the difference of weight and functional strength respectively between the groups. Results: The patients in the RG reported a statistically significant weight reduction (p < 0.001) and improvement in the functional strength (p < 0.001) within the group. Similarly, the patients in the CG also reported a significant improvement in the scores of functional strength (p = 0.004) within the group. The improvement in the scores of functional strength was greater in the patients of RG than the CG (p < 0.001. Similarly, the patients in the RG reported a statistically significant reduction in weight than the CG (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The REs could improve weight, functional strength and exercise adherence.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document