Integrated Management Of Root-Knot Nematodes In Mediterranean Horticultural Crops

Author(s):  
C. Ornat ◽  
F. J. Sorribas
2015 ◽  
Vol 71 ◽  
pp. 45-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nessie D. Luambano ◽  
Rama D. Narla ◽  
Waceke J. Wanjohi ◽  
John W. Kimenju ◽  
Brian R. Kerry

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Dalvan do Nascimento ◽  
Roberta Luiza Vidal ◽  
Anderson Alves Pimenta ◽  
Marilia Gregolin Costa ◽  
Pedro Luiz Martins Soares

The relationship of crops grown in rotation or in succession has increased every day and the use of antagonistic plants and/or non-host plants is one of the most efficient practices of integrated management of nematodes. This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of crotalaria (Crotalaria spectabilis Roth) and millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) Leeke] ‘ADR 300’ in reducing the population of Meloidogyne incognita and M. javanica and in increasing the productivity of okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench] when cultivated in succession. The experiment was conducted in an area cultivating okra (host culture) in rotation, with a history of severe infestation by phytonematoids. The experimental design involved randomized blocks with six treatments and four replicates, with the following treatments: T1, 15 kg.ha-1 of millet seeds; T2, 30 kg.ha-1 of crotalaria; T3, 10 kg.ha-1 of millet + 20 kg.ha-1 of crotalaria; T4, 20 kg.ha-1 of millet + 6 kg.ha-1  of crotalaria; T5, 6 kg.ha-1 of millet + 36 kg.ha-1 of crotalaria; and T6, control. The nematode populations in the soil and roots were evaluated about 60 d after planting okra, and the yield was evaluated at the end of the crop cycle. Simple treatment with millet or crotalaria reduced the nematode population by 61% and 72%, respectively. The millet-crotalaria intercropping treatments reduced the nematode population by up to 85% compared with the control. In terms of productivity, there was an increase of 787 kg.ha-1 in the millet treatment and 2,109 kg.ha-1 in the intercropping treatments. Both the single cultivation of crotalaria or millet and the consortia of crotalaria and millet were effective in controlling the root-knot nematodes, and increased the productivity of okra.


2022 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 221-238
Author(s):  
Tom W. Pope ◽  
Joe M. Roberts

Vine weevil, also known as black vine weevil, Otiorhynchus sulcatus, has been one of the most economically important pest species of global horticultural crops for the past five decades. This period has seen many changes in crop protection practices, including wide-scale adoption of biological controls such as entomopathogenic nematodes and fungi in place of conventional synthetic insecticides. Despite the experimental efficacy of these controls, growers continue to report significant crop losses associated with vine weevil infestation. We argue that simply switching from synthetic insecticides to biological controls, rather than using these controls as part of an integrated management program, is a key factor in the continued importance of this pest. An improved understanding of vine weevil biology and ecology is at the center of the development of truly integrated pest management programs. To this end, we identify opportunities created through recent vine weevil research and highlight key knowledge gaps in which further research may contribute to improved future management approaches.


2021 ◽  
pp. 255-262
Author(s):  
Raman K. Walia

Abstract This chapter discusses the economic importance, geographical distribution, host range, damage symptoms, biology and life cycle, interactions with other nematodes and pathogens, recommended integrated management, and management optimization of root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) in open-field and protected tomatoes in India. Future research requirements and future developments are also mentioned.


2021 ◽  
pp. 263-269
Author(s):  
Nicola Greco ◽  
Nicola Sasanelli

Abstract This chapter discusses the economic importance, host range, damage symptoms, biology and life cycle, recommended integrated management, and management optimization of root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) in protected tomatoes in Italy. Future research requirements are also mentioned.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 443
Author(s):  
Jonas A. Arnemann ◽  
Júlia G. Bevilaqua ◽  
Lauro Bernardi ◽  
Danielle O. da Rosa ◽  
Fábio A. da Encarnação ◽  
...  

The whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius, 1889) is a major pest species in many agricultural crops worldwide. Growers from the Vale do Caí region, in Southern Brazil (Rio Grande do Sul state) have been facing severe economic losses due to the increasing damages caused by this sucking insect in their horticultural crops. Small-scale farming in the Vale do Caí region relies heavily on horticulture, with many families involved in the activity and a consumer market spread throughout the whole state. Virus transmission and other damages inflicted by B. tabaci are especially harmful to tomato plants, and the managing of the pest currently demands two thirds of all chemical insecticides used in the region. While chemical control remains the main strategy for whitefly management on tomato crops, control failures and lack of updated information have led tomato growers to raise the number of sprays per crop cycle, with selection of resistant populations and harmful effects on the environment as consequent risks. The aim of this work was to evaluate chemical compounds and bioinsecticides in the control of B. tabaci nymphs and adults on tomato plants grown in two different greenhouses and under natural infestation conditions. The most efficient treatment for the control of B. tabaci adults was cyantraniliprole + lambda-cyhalothrin (50+30 g a.i. ha-1) with 64% of average control efficiency. As for nymph control, the most efficient treatment was the Embrapa formula, a bioinsecticide composed of 0.5% flaxseed oil + 0.5% neutral detergent + 0.3% sodium bicarbonate, which resulted in 72% of whitefly control in average.


2003 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 623 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. R. Stirling ◽  
A. M. Stirling

In glasshouse experiments, Meloidogyne javanica reproduced on Brassica juncea, B. napus and BQMulch, a commercial biofumigant crop consisting of both B. napus and B. campestris. Although nematode multiplication rates were only 3–23% of the rate on a highly susceptible crop (tomato), they were high enough to suggest that Brassica rotation crops will increase root-knot nematode populations to potentially damaging levels in situations where temperatures do not limit nematode reproduction. A field study showed that this problem could be prevented in subtropical climates by restricting the growth of Brassica crops to June, July and August, when low temperatures limit nematode development and eggs are not produced until about 10 weeks after planting. Field and pot experiments in which M. javanica was introduced into soil following incorporation of Brassica residues failed to demonstrate a 'biofumigation' effect, possibly because the soil was too dry or the degree of tissue disruption was insufficient to maximise isothiocyanate release. Numbers of root-knot nematodes were reduced when Brassica roots, leaves and stems were incorporated into soil at 17 t DM/ha, but it is unlikely that this was due to the production of nematoxic chemicals, as large numbers of free-living nematodes multiplied during the decomposition process. From a practical perspective, these results suggest that green-manured Brassica rotation crops are unlikely to be useful for controlling root-knot nematodes on some subtropical horticultural crops that are currently fumigated for nematode control. The susceptibility of brassicas to M. javanica and the need to grow them during winter limits their potential in the vegetable industry, while difficulties in obtaining a biofumigation effect in dry soil will reduce effectiveness in non-irrigated pineapple soils. Brassicas are likely to be most useful in the ginger industry, as they can be grown during the winter break between ginger crops and fields can be irrigated before the Brassica crop is incorporated into soil.


Nematology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 463-473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianbin Liu ◽  
Jingzu Sun ◽  
Jiyan Qiu ◽  
Xingzhong Liu ◽  
Meichun Xiang

Nematicides are the main method for managing root-knot nematodes but they are not environmentally benign. Biological control is one alternative that has a lower or no environmental impact. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of two nematicides (Fosthiazate and Dazomet), a biocontrol agent (Purpureocillium lilacinum(=Paecilomyces lilacinus) YES-2), their combination on controlling root-knot nematodes on tomato plants and their effects on the rhizosphere microbial community in long-term glasshouse experiments. The gall index and numbers of second-stage juveniles (J2) were significantly reduced by the individual treatments of Fosthiazate, Dazomet orP. lilacinumYES-2.Purpureocillium lilacinumYES-2 combined with a half dose of Fosthiazate showed the most efficient control as indicated by gall index and number of J2 compared with the control treatment in glasshouse experiments conducted over a 5-year period (2007-2011). The bacterial and fungal biodiversity in soil measured using Biolog ECO MicroPlates and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) fingerprint was higher in the treatments ofP. lilacinumYES-2 alone or its combination with chemicals than in the treatments of Dazomet or Fosthiazate (in 2011 only). This study suggested a synergistic effect on the control of root-knot nematode byP. lilacinumYES-2 combined with Fosthiazate, and the contribution of these two treatments to the microbial communities in the soil.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document