Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) Orders

2004 ◽  
pp. 149-153
Author(s):  
Ronald L. Eisenberg
1981 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 3-7
Author(s):  
George J. Annas

In a previous column I discussed the testimony of a number of nurses in the case of Ms. Sharon Siebert. That case was decided by a lower court on February 13, 1981, and this column discusses Judge Lindsay G. Arthur's opinion. Jane Hoyt, a friend, not a relative, of Ms. Siebert, brought suit to enjoin an order not to resuscitate that had been written on Ms. Siebert. The case raised a number of important issues, including whether the court would allow a suit brought by someone in Ms. Hoyt's position vis-à-vis the patient, and if it did, what legal standard the court might require in the writing of Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) orders.


Resuscitation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 86 ◽  
pp. e3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Santhanam Sundar ◽  
Josephine Do ◽  
Michael. O’Cathail

Stroke ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pratik Bhattacharya ◽  
Ambooj Tiwari ◽  
Sam Watson ◽  
Scott Millis ◽  
Seemant Chaturvedi ◽  
...  

Background: The importance of early institution of “Do Not Resuscitate” (DNR) orders in determining outcomes from intracerebral hemorrhage is established. In the setting of acute ischemic stroke, African Americans tend to utilize critical care interventions more and palliative care options less than Caucasians. Recent epidemiological studies in acute ischemic stroke have shown a somewhat better survival for African Americans compared with Caucasians. Our hypothesis was that racial differences in early institution of DNR orders would influence mortality in acute ischemic stroke. Methods: a retrospective chart review was conducted on consecutive admissions for acute ischemic stroke across 10 hospitals in Michigan for the year 2006. Subjects with self reported race as African American or Caucasian were selected. Demographics, stroke risk factors, pre morbid status, DNR by day 2 of admission, stroke outcome and discharge destination were abstracted. Results: The study included 574 subjects (144 African American, 25.1%; 430 Caucasian, 74.9%). In-hospital mortality was significantly higher among Caucasians (8.6% vs. 1.4% amongst African Americans, p=0.003). More Caucasians had institution of DNR by day 2 than African Americans (22.5% vs. 4.3%, p<0.0001). When adjusted for racial differences in DNR by day 2 status, Caucasian race no longer predicted mortality. Caucasians were significantly older than African Americans (median age 76 vs. 63.5 years, p<0.0001); and age was a significant predictor of DNR by day 2 and mortality. In the adjusted analysis, however, age marginally influenced the racial disparity in mortality ( table ). Caucasians with coronary disease, atrial fibrillation, severe strokes and unable to walk prior to the stroke tend to be made DNR by day 2 more frequently. Only 27.1% of Caucasians with early DNR orders died in the hospital, whereas 20.8% were eventually discharged home. Conclusions: Early DNR orders result in a racial disparity in mortality from acute ischemic stroke. A substantial proportion of patients with early DNR orders eventually go home. Postponing the use of DNR orders may allow aggressive critical care interventions that may potentially mitigate the racial differences in mortality.


1993 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 317-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
James G. Adams

AbstractIntroduction:Many states in the United States ‘have developed policies that enable prehospital emergency medical services (EMS) providers to withhold cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in the terminally ill. Several states also have policies that enable the implementation of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders.Objectives:1) assess which states have statutes governing DNR orders for the prehospital setting; 2) determine which states authorize DNR orders in ways other than by specific state statue; and 3) define those states that had regional protocols which address prehospital DNR orders.Methods:Survey of the state EMS directors in each of the 50 U.S. states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico.Results:As of 1992, specific legislation authorizing the implementation of DNR orders was in place in 11 states. In addition, six others have a legal opinion or policy allowing the implementation of DNR orders. Fourteen additional states have either working groups or legislation pending that address prehospital DNR orders. In only five were there no existing regional protocols for implementation of DNR orders in the prehospital setting.Conclusions:There exists great variation in legal authorization by states for implementation of DNR orders in the prehospital setting. Despite the existence of enabling legislation, many state, regional, or local EMS systems have implemented policies dealing with DNR orders.


2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 401-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shoshana H. Bardach ◽  
Edward J. Dunn ◽  
J. Christopher Stein

Discussions regarding patient preferences for resuscitation are often delayed and preferences may be neglected, leading to the receipt of unwanted medical care. To better understand barriers to the expression and realization of patients’ end of life wishes, a preventive ethics team in one Veterans Affairs Medical Center conducted a survey of physicians, nurses, social workers, and respiratory therapists. Surveys were analyzed through qualitative analysis, using sorting methodologies to identify themes. Analysis revealed barriers to patient wishes being identified and followed, including discomfort conducting end-of-life discussions, difficulty locating patients’ preferences in medical records, challenges with expiring do not resuscitate (DNR) orders, and confusion over terminology. Based on these findings, the preventive ethics team proposed new terminology for code status preferences, elimination of the local policy for expiration of DNR orders, and enhanced systems for storing and retrieving patients’ end-of-life preferences. Educational efforts were initiated to facilitate implementation of the proposed changes.


2018 ◽  
Vol 84 (10) ◽  
pp. 1565-1569
Author(s):  
Lobsang Marcia ◽  
Zane W. Ashman ◽  
Eric B. Pillado ◽  
Dennis Y. Kim ◽  
David S. Plurad

Formal communication of end-of-life preferences is crucial among patients with metastatic cancer. Our objective is to describe the prevalence of advance directives (AD) and do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders among stage IV cancer patients with acute care surgery consultations, and the associated outcomes. This is a single institution retrospective review over an eight-year period. Two hundred and three patients were identified; mean age was 55.3 ± 11.4 years and 48.8 per cent were male. Fifty (24.6%) patients underwent exploratory surgery. Nineteen (10.6%) patients had another type of surgery. Twenty-one (10.3%) patients had a DNR order, and none had an AD on-admission. Fifty-four (26.6%) patients had a DNR order placed and four (2%) patients completed an AD postadmission. DNR postadmission was associated with the highest mortality at 42.6 per cent compared with 14.3 per cent for DNR on-admission and 1.56 per cent for full-code patients ( P < 0.001). Compared with patients that remained full-code and those with DNR on-admission, DNR postadmission was associated with longer length of stay (19.6 days; P < 0.001) and ICU length of stay (7.72 days; P < 0.001). The prevalence of AD and DNR orders among stage IV cancer patients is low. The higher in-hospital mortality of patients with DNR postadmission reflects the use of DNR orders during clinical decline.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18327-e18327
Author(s):  
Giselle Alexandra Suero-Abreu ◽  
Camille Michelle Johnson ◽  
Marshall McKenna ◽  
Jun Chih Wang ◽  
Aldo Barajas-Ochoa ◽  
...  

e18327 Background: Many cancer patients (pts) receive aggressive medical care at the end-of-life (EOL) . The objective of this study was to assess quality of EOL (qEOL) care in cancer pts at our VA and to determine the implementation of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders. Methods: Records of Veterans followed at the VA NJ Health Care System who died from 2015-2017 were reviewed. The qEOL care was assessed using seven indicators by Earle et al. ( J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(6):1133-1138). EOL planning (use of DNRs and use of palliative and hospice services) was also assessed. Results: We identified 92 male pts with cancer (mean age 73 years ±10). There were Caucasian (n = 48, 52%) and African American (n = 38, 41%) pts. The most common malignancies were lung (22%), gastrointestinal (21%), prostate (16%) and hematological (14%). 87 pts (95%) had a DNR order at the time of death; the DNR was obtained a median of 60 days prior (IQR 7-135). Ten pts (11%) had DNR orders placed within 1 week of death. Seven pts (8%) received chemotherapy in the last 14 days of life while 6 pts (7%) received a new treatment in their last 30 days. In the last month of life, 35 pts (38%) had multiple hospitalizations and ER visits, 20 pts (22%) were admitted to the intensive care unit, 9 pts (10%) were intubated, and 3 pts [3%] received cardiopulmonary resuscitation. More pts (n = 47, 51%) died in an acute care setting, and 45 (49%) pts were admitted to hospice (median of 22 days before death, IQR 6-52). Four pts (4%) were admitted to hospice within 3 days of death. A next-of-kin was available for 64 pts (70%). Palliative care (PC) was provided to 83 pts (90%) and pain medications prescribed for 80 pts (87%). Conclusions: There was timely implementation of DNRs and referral to PC. The qEOL indicators used suggest that aggressive treatments were appropriately being held at the EOL. However, there was an increased use of acute care services. Limitations include lack of data on Veterans who died outside the VA. This data supports future quality improvement EOL interventions. [Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document