Lung Ultrasound in Respiratory Failure and Pneumonia

Author(s):  
Keith P. Guevarra
2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan L. DeSanti ◽  
Awni M. Al-Subu ◽  
Eileen A. Cowan ◽  
Nicole N. Kamps ◽  
Michael R. Lasarev ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Daniele G. BIASUCCI ◽  
Danilo BUONSENSO ◽  
Alfonso PIANO ◽  
Nicola BONADIA ◽  
Joel VARGAS ◽  
...  

Breathe ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 100-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Lichtenstein

This review article is an update of what should be known for practicing basic lung ultrasound in the critically ill (LUCI) and is also of interest for less critical disciplines (e.g. pulmonology). It pinpoints on the necessity of a professional machine (not necessarily a sophisticated one) and probe. It lists the 10 main signs of LUCI and some of the main protocols made possible using LUCI: the BLUE protocol for a respiratory failure, the FALLS protocol for a circulatory failure, the SESAME protocol for a cardiac arrest and the investigation of a ventilated acute respiratory distress syndrome patient, etc. It shows how the field has been fully standardised to avoid confusion.Key pointsA simple ultrasonography unit is fully adequate, with minimal filters, and provides a unique probe for integrating the lung into a holistic, whole-body approach to the critically ill.Interstitial syndrome is strictly defined. Its clinical relevance in the critically ill is standardised for defining haemodynamic pulmonary oedema, pneumonia and pulmonary embolism.Pneumothorax is strictly and sequentially defined by the A′-profile (at the anterior wall in a supine or semirecumbent patient, abolished lung siding plus the A-line sign) and then the lung point.The BLUE protocol integrates lung and venous ultrasound findings for expediting the diagnosis of acute respiratory failure, following pathophysiology, allowing prompt diagnosis of pneumonia, haemodynamic pulmonary oedema, exacerbated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma, pulmonary embolism or pneumothorax, even in clinically challenging presentations.Educational aimsTo understand that the use of lung ultrasound, although long standardised, still needs educational efforts for its best use, a suitable machine, a suitable universal probe and an appropriate culture.To be able to use a terminology that has been fully standardised to avoid any confusion of useless wording.To understand the logic of the BLUE points, three points of interest enabling expedition of a lung ultrasound examination in acute respiratory failure.To be able to cite, in the correct hierarchy, the seven criteria of the B-line, then those of interstitial syndrome.To understand the sequential thinking when making ultrasound diagnosis of pneumothorax.To be able to use the BLUE protocol for building profiles of pneumonia (or acute respiratory distress syndrome) and understand their limitations.To understand that lung ultrasound can be used for the direct analysis of an acute respiratory failure (the BLUE protocol), an acute circulatory failure (the FALLS protocol) and even a cardiac arrest (SESAME protocol), following a pathophysiological approach.To understand that the first sequential target in the SESAME protocol (search first for pneumothorax in cardiac arrest) can also be used in countless more quiet settings of countless disciplines, making lung ultrasound in the critically ill cost-, time- and radiation-saving.To be able to perform a BLUE protocol in challenging patients, understanding how the best lung ultrasound can be obtained from bariatric or agitated, dyspnoeic patients.


2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nga Wing Tsai ◽  
Chun Wai Ngai ◽  
Ka Leung Mok ◽  
James W Tsung

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-59
Author(s):  
O. O. Valenko ◽  
O. O. Volkov ◽  
A. S. Bessarab

This article contains rather motivating than teaching information. It is a synthesis of analysis of authoritative global scientific publications and personal experience. The modern approaches to diagnosis of critical respiratory incidents using ultrasound, superficial theoretical review of the core of the method and our own experiences regarding effective protocol of sonographic lung assessment are presented here. Several interesting clinical cases emphasize the advantages of routine use of diagnostic ultrasound in patients with critical uncompensated respiratory disaster as well as in sub-compensated and compensated patients. The main principles of bedside lung ultrasound in emergency that should encourage wider implementation and use of this method by doctors of different specialties are: “Lung ultrasound is very easy to perform using simple equipment”, and “BLUE-protocol is a simple protocol that allows quick (< 3 min) diagnosis of the cause of respiratory failure”. Lung sonographic assessment allows not only to determine quickly the cause of critical respiratory failure and counteract it starting the etiotropic treatment as soon as possible, but also visualize the dynamics of pathological changes in response to therapy, thus allowing us to evaluate its effectiveness properly. The use of ultrasound in diagnosing enables more adequate decision making regarding the need of interventional therapy. It also leads to setting the right diagnosis faster, improving the quality of medical care, shortening the length of stay of patients in ICU, decreasing the total cost of the treatment. Identification and analysis of the amount of sonographic signs “B-lines – lung rockets” provides an opportunity to measure the volume/amount of interstitial lung fluid properly and track this marker/indicator in dynamics in response to the treatment. The unified method of protocolized assessment should be used within one medical facility in order to boost effectiveness and make evaluation and dynamic evaluation of pathological changes more objective by the same one or different medical specialists. Diagnostic ultrasound has a very low cost and there is no radiation exposure to patients which allows performing as many examinations as needed, without limitations.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. e245900
Author(s):  
Rajkumar Rajendram ◽  
Arif Hussain

Although, cardiac injury, pneumothorax and pneumomediastinum are associated with COVID-19, differentiation of their symptoms and signs from those of COVID-19 itself is challenging. Without a high index of suspicion, cardiomyopathy and anterior pneumothorax are easily missed. These complications may be underdiagnosed in patients with COVID-19. Cardiomyopathy and pneumothorax may cause or exacerbate respiratory failure. If their management is delayed, cardiac arrest can occur. To increase the awareness of these issues, we describe the course and imaging of a 39-year-old woman with severe COVID-19 who developed cardiomyopathy and a small anterior pneumothorax with pneumomediastinum. Transthoracic echocardiography is technically challenging in the presence of anterior pneumothorax. Furthermore, although CT is the gold standard for the diagnosis of pneumothorax, this is not always feasible in critically ill patients. Lateral decubitus chest X-rays and lung ultrasound may facilitate the diagnosis of pneumothorax at the bedside of patients with COVID-19.


F1000Research ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 788
Author(s):  
Mark E. Haaksma ◽  
Esther J. Nossent ◽  
Paul Elbers ◽  
Pieter Roel Tuinman

When using lung ultrasound to determine the cause of acute respiratory failure, the BLUE protocol is often used. In a 65-year old patient, an A/B-profile was found, suggesting pneumonia, following the flowchart of this protocol. In this case, however, pulmonary hemorrhage confirmed by bronchoscopy was the final diagnosis. This case report outlines the importance of understanding the limitations of the BLUE protocol and that lung ultrasound findings should always be used in the context of the patient’s history and physical exam. In addition, pulmonary hemorrhage should be considered in patients with no clinical signs of pneumonia and/or presence of risk factors for lung bleeding as a rare cause of lung ultrasound A/B-profile.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document