Cytotoxic Chemotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

2007 ◽  
pp. 69-84
Author(s):  
M.Wasif Saif ◽  
Richard Kim ◽  
Edward Chu
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cytotoxic Chemotherapy

scholarly journals The Evolutionary Landscape of Treatment for BRAFV600E Mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 137
Author(s):  
Gianluca Mauri ◽  
Erica Bonazzina ◽  
Alessio Amatu ◽  
Federica Tosi ◽  
Katia Bencardino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Mapk Pathway ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Braf Inhibitor ◽  
Current Treatment ◽  
Cytotoxic Chemotherapy ◽  
Cytotoxic Agents ◽  
Poor Prognostic Factor

The BRAFV600E mutation is found in 8–10% of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients and it is recognized as a poor prognostic factor with a median overall survival inferior to 20 months. At present, besides immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) for those tumors with concomitant MSI-H status, recommended treatment options include cytotoxic chemotherapy + anti-VEGF in the first line setting, and a combination of EGFR and a BRAF inhibitor (cetuximab plus encorafenib) in second line. However, even with the latter targeted approach, acquired resistance limits the possibility of more than an incremental benefit and survival is still dismal. In this review, we discuss current treatment options for this subset of patients and perform a systematic review of ongoing clinical trials. Overall, we identified six emerging strategies: targeting MAPK pathway (monotherapy or combinations), targeting MAPK pathway combined with cytotoxic agents, intensive cytotoxic regimen combinations, targeted agents combined with CPIs, oxidative stress induction, and cytotoxic agents combined with antiangiogenic drugs and CPIs. In the future, the integration of new therapeutic strategies targeting key players in the BRAFV600E oncogenic pathways with current treatment approach based on cytotoxic chemotherapy and surgery is likely to redefine the treatment landscape of these CRC patients.

Does Nutritional Status Affect Treatment Tolarability, Response and Survival in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients? Results of a Prospective Multicenter Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karabulut Senem ◽  
Dogan Izzet ◽  
Cigdem Usul Afsar ◽  
Karabulut Mehmet ◽  
Sule Kahraman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Multicenter Study ◽  
Cytotoxic Chemotherapy ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Severe Malnutrition ◽  
Chemotherapy Response ◽  
Drug Induced

Abstract Background: The efficacy and tolerability of modern cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens used in malnourished metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients is uncertain. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of malnutrition on efficacy and tolerability of cytotoxic chemotherapy and overall survival in mCRC patients.Methods: In this multicenter study, demographic, oncologic and nutritional data were collected prospectively from mCRC patients. Nutritional status of the patients were evaluated on the basis of NRI, BMI and WL before the first chemotherapy, after the first and second chemotherapy during 2 cycles of chemotherapy every 15 days. To determine the inter-treatment weight loss toxicity assessment was included to theese parameters after each chemotherapy. NRI calculation was performed as [1.51xserum albumin level (g/L)+41.7xcurrent weight/basic weight]. . NRIs were examined in 3 categories as ‘no malnutrition’ (NRI >97.5), ‘moderate malnutrition’ (97.5 ≥ NRI ≥83.5) or ‘severe malnutrition’ (NRI <83.5). Response to treatment and drug-induced toxicities were assessed based on Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and National Cancer Institute CTCAE version 4.0 respectively.Results: One-hundred and thirty-seven mCRC patients were prospectively included. Median age was 48 (range 18-83). Primary location was colon in 66% of patients and 84% of their primary source was left colon. Malnutrition was detected in 39% of the cases. Response rate to treatment was twenty four percent. While there was no significant relationship between chemotherapy response and moderate/severe malnutrition (p=0.24), moderate/severe malnutrition was associated with multipl site of metastases, WHO PS of 1, over the median value of CEA/CA 19-9 levels (p=0.003, p=0.03, p<0.001, and p=0.02; respectively). Hypoalbuminemia and moderate/severe malnutrition were associated with all types of toxicity (p<0.001 and p<0.001). Moderate/severe malnutrition was associated with thrombocytopenia, and diarrhea following chemotherapy predominately, (p=0.02 and p=0.04; respectively). In moderate/severe malnutrition group median overall survival was prominently shorter than those with no malnutrition [6.6 moths (95%CI, 5.6-7.6) vs 11.9 moths (95% CI, 11.1-12.7) respectively, p<0.001].Conclusions: Our study showed that moderate/severe malnutrition in mCRC patients was associated with decreased overall survival and increased chemotherapy toxicity.

Does nutritional status affect treatment tolarability, response, and survival in metastatic colorectal cancer patients? Results of prospective multicenter study.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 70-70
Author(s):  
Senem Karabulut ◽  
İzzet Dogan ◽  
Çiğdem Usul Afşar ◽  
Mehmet Karabulut ◽  
Sule Karaman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Multicenter Study ◽  
Cytotoxic Chemotherapy ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Severe Malnutrition ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients

70 Background: The efficacy and tolerability of modern cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens used in malnourished metastatic colorectal cancer patients is uncertain. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of malnutrition on efficacy and tolerability of cytotoxic chemotherapy and overall survival in mCRC patients. Methods: In this multicenter study, demographic, oncologic and nutritional data were collected prospectively from mCRC patients. Nutritional status were evaluated on the basis of NRI, BMI and WL before the first chemotherapy, after the first and second chemotherapy. To determine the inter-treatment weight loss toxicity assessment was included to theese parameters after each chemotherapy. NRIs were examined in 3 categories as ‘no malnutrition’ (NRI >97.5), ‘moderate malnutrition’ (97.5 ≥ NRI ≥83.5) or ‘severe malnutrition’ (NRI <83.5). Response to treatment and drug-induced toxicities were assessed based on RECIST 1.1 and CTCAE version 4.0 respectively. Results: 137 mCRC patients were prospectively included. Median age was 48 (range 18-83). Primary location was colon in 66% of patients, 84% of them source was left colon. Malnutrition was detected in 39% of the cases. Response rate to treatment was 24 %. Moderate / severe malnutrition was associated with multipl site of metastases, WHO PS of 1, over the median value of CEA/CA 19-9 levels (p=0.003, p=0.03, p<0.001, and p=0.02; respectively). Hypoalbuminemia and moderate/severe malnutrition were associated with all types of toxicity (p<0.001 and p<0.001). Moderate/severe malnutrition was associated with thrombocytopenia, and diarrhea following chemotherapy predominately, (p=0.02 and p=0.04; respectively). In moderate/severe malnutrition group median overall survival was prominently shorter than those with no malnutrition [6.6 moths (95 %CI, 5.6-7.6) vs 11.9 moths (95 % CI, 11.1-12.7) respectively, p<0.001]. Conclusions: Our study showed that moderate/severe malnutrition in mCRC patients was associated with decreased overall survival and increased chemotherapy toxicity.

Integration of Biologic Agents With Cytotoxic Chemotherapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 245-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vikram K. Jain ◽  
Eliza A. Hawkes ◽  
David Cunningham
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cytotoxic Chemotherapy ◽  
Biologic Agents

scholarly journals Effect of oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine on circulating and imaging biomarkers in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a prospective biomarker study

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Reem D. Mahmood ◽  
Danielle Shaw ◽  
Tine Descamps ◽  
Cong Zhou ◽  
Robert D. Morgan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cytotoxic Chemotherapy ◽  
Imaging Biomarker ◽  
Imaging Biomarkers ◽  
Pre Treatment ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer are treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy supplemented by molecularly targeted therapies. There is a critical need to define biomarkers that can optimise the use of these therapies to maximise efficacy and avoid unnecessary toxicity. However, it is important to first define the changes in potential biomarkers following cytotoxic chemotherapy alone. This study reports the impact of standard cytotoxic chemotherapy across a range of circulating and imaging biomarkers. Methods A single-centre, prospective, biomarker-driven study. Eligible patients included those diagnosed with colorectal cancer with liver metastases that were planned to receive first line oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine. Patients underwent paired blood sampling and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and biomarkers were associated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results Twenty patients were recruited to the study. Data showed that chemotherapy significantly reduced the number of circulating tumour cells as well as the circulating concentrations of Ang1, Ang2, VEGF-A, VEGF-C and VEGF-D from pre-treatment to cycle 2 day 2. The changes in circulating concentrations were not associated with PFS or OS. On average, the MRI perfusion/permeability parameter, Ktrans, increased in response to cytotoxic chemotherapy from pre-treatment to cycle 2 day 2 and this increase was associated with worse OS (HR 1.099, 95%CI 1.01–1.20, p = 0.025). Conclusions In patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer with liver metastases, treatment with standard chemotherapy changes cell- and protein-based biomarkers, although these changes are not associated with survival outcomes. In contrast, the imaging biomarker, Ktrans, offers promise to direct molecularly targeted therapies such as anti-angiogenic agents.

scholarly journals Effect of oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine on circulating and imaging biomarkers in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a prospective biomarker study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reem Mahmood ◽  
Danielle Shaw ◽  
Tine Descamps ◽  
Cong Zhou ◽  
Robert D. Morgan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Cytotoxic Chemotherapy ◽  
Imaging Biomarker ◽  
Imaging Biomarkers ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Pre Treatment ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background: Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer are treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy supplemented by molecularly targeted therapies. There is a critical need to define biomarkers that can optimise the use of these therapies to maximise efficacy and avoid unnecessary toxicity. However, it is important to firstly define the changes in potential biomarkers following cytotoxic chemotherapy alone. This study reports the impact of standard cytotoxic chemotherapy across a range of circulating and imaging biomarkers.Methods: A single-centre, prospective, biomarker-driven study. Eligible patients included those diagnosed with colorectal cancer with liver metastases that were planned to receive first line oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine. Patients underwent paired blood sampling and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and biomarkers were associated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).Results: 20 patients were recruited to the study. Results showed that chemotherapy significantly reduced the number of circulating tumour cells as well as the circulating concentrations of Ang1, Ang2, VEGF-A, VEGF-C and VEGF-D from pre-treatment to cycle 2 day 2. The changes in circulating concentrations were not associated with PFS or OS. Across all patients, the MRI perfusion parameter, Ktrans, increased in response to cytotoxic chemotherapy from pre-treatment to cycle 2 day 2 and this increase was associated with worse OS (HR 1.099, 95%CI 1.01-1.20, p=0.025).Conclusions: In patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer with liver metastases, treatment with standard chemotherapy changes cell- and protein-based biomarkers, although these changes are not associated with survival outcomes. In contrast, the imaging biomarker, Ktrans, offers promise to direct molecular targeted therapies such as anti-angiogenic agents.

Does nutritional status affect treatment tolarability, response and survival in metastatic colorectal cancer patients? Results of a prospective multicenter study

2020 ◽  
pp. 107815522095942
Author(s):  
Senem Karabulut ◽  
Izzet Dogan ◽  
Cigdem Usul Afsar ◽  
Mehmet Karabulut ◽  
Sule Karaman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Multicenter Study ◽  
Cytotoxic Chemotherapy ◽  
World Health ◽  
Severe Malnutrition ◽  
Chemotherapy Response

Background The efficacy and tolerability of modern cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens used in malnourished metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients is uncertain. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of malnutrition on efficacy and tolerability of cytotoxic chemotherapy and overall survival in mCRC patients. Methods In this multicenter study, demographic, oncologic and nutritional data were collected prospectively from mCRC patients. Nutritional status of the patients were evaluated on the basis of NRI (Nutritional Risk Assessment), BMI (Body Mass Index) and WL (Weight Loss) before the first chemotherapy, after the first and second chemotherapy during 2 cycles of chemotherapy every 15 days. To determine the inter-treatment weight loss toxicity assessment was included to theese parameters after each chemotherapy. NRI calculation was performed as [1.51xserum albumin level (g/L)+41.7xcurrent weight/basic weight]. NRIs were examined in 3 categories as ‘no malnutrition’ (NRI >97.5), ‘moderate malnutrition’ (97.5 ≥NRI ≥83.5) or ‘severe malnutrition’ (NRI <83.5). Response to treatment and drug-induced toxicities were assessed based on Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and National Cancer Institute CTCAE version 4.0 respectively. Results One-hundred and thirty-seven mCRC patients were prospectively included. Median age was 48 (range 18-83). Primary location was colon in 66% of patients and 84% of their primary source was left colon. Malnutrition was detected in 39% of the cases. Response rate to treatment was twenty four percent. While there was no significant relationship between chemotherapy response and moderate/severe malnutrition (p = 0.24), moderate/severe malnutrition was associated with multipl site of metastases, WHO PS (World Health Organization Performance Status) of 1, over the median value of CEA/CA 19-9 (carcinoembryonic antigen/carbohydate antigen 19-9) levels (p = 0.003, p = 0.03, p < 0.001, and p = 0.02; respectively). Hypoalbuminemia and moderate/severe malnutrition were associated with all types of toxicity (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001). Moderate/severe malnutrition was associated with thrombocytopenia, and diarrhea following chemotherapy predominately, (p = 0.02 and p = 0.04; respectively). In moderate/severe malnutrition group median overall survival was prominently shorter than those with no malnutrition [6.6 moths (95%CI, 5.6-7.6) vs 11.9 moths (95% CI, 11.1-12.7) respectively, p < 0.001]. Conclusions Our study showed that moderate/severe malnutrition in mCRC patients was associated with decreased overall survival and increased chemotherapy toxicity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document