Consumer Protection of Digital Financial Services in Russia and Abroad

2020 ◽  
pp. 76-87
Author(s):  
Evgenia E. Frolova ◽  
Elena P. Ermakova ◽  
Olga V. Protopopova
Keyword(s):  
Consumer Protection ◽  
Financial Services

scholarly journals Consumer Protection and Contingent Charges

2012 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 477-493 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Armstrong ◽  
John Vickers
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Consumer Protection ◽  
Financial Services ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Regulatory Intervention

Contingent charges for financial services, such as fees for unauthorized overdrafts, are often controversial. We study the economics of contingent charges in a stylized setting with naive and sophisticated consumers. We contrast situations where the naive benefit from the presence of sophisticated consumers with situations where competition works to subsidize the sophisticated at the expense of the naive, arguably unfairly. The case for regulatory intervention in these situations depends in good part, but not only, on the weight placed on distributional concerns. The economic and legal issues at stake are well illustrated by a case on bank charges recently decided by the U.K. Supreme Court. (JEL D14, D18, G21, G28, L51)

scholarly journals Kewenangan Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK) dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Asuransi Pasca Keluarnya Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) Nomor 1/POJK.07/2014

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 102
Author(s):  
Wisnu Kumala ◽  
Yaswirman Yaswirman ◽  
Ulfanora Ulfanora
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Consumer Protection ◽  
Financial Services ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Research Results ◽  
Consumer Protection Act ◽  
Legal Effect ◽  
Legal Consequences

There is a tug of authority in resolving insurance disputes outside the court between the Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency (BPSK) based on Law Nomor 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection with Alternative Dispute Resolution Institutions (LAPS) based on Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 1/POJK.07/2014. This encourages the author to conduct legal research in order to determine the authority of BPSK in resolving insurance disputes as well as the legal consequences of the decision after the issuance of the Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 1/POJK.07/2014 using the statutory approach. This legal research results in the finding that BPSK is still authorized to settle insurance disputes following the issuance of the Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 1/POJK.07/2014, this is based on the provisions of the Lex superior derogat legi inferiori principle. Then there is no legal effect on the BPSK decision after the issuance of the Financial Services Authority Regulation. This is because BPSK's decision has been based on Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection, whose position is higher than the Regulation of the Financial Services Authority. So there is no need for BPSK to follow the provisions of the regulations whose hierarchy of legislation is lower than the Consumer Protection Act. Therefore BPSK's decision is "final and binding" as explained in Article 54 paragraph 3 of the Consumer Protection Act.

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI NASABAH PENGGUNA INTERNET BANKING

GANEC SWARA ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 207
Author(s):  
ALINE FEBRIANY LOILEWEN ◽  
TITIN TITAWATI
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Consumer Protection ◽  
Financial Services ◽  
Service Sector ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Internet Banking ◽  
Electronic Information ◽  
Customer Complaints ◽  
Services Sector ◽  
Financial Services Sector

  This study aims to examine and analyze how the legal protection and supervision of the banking world for customers using internet banking facilities.  This study uses a form of normative legal research, namely research that is based on written rules and legislation and various literature related to the problems that will be discussed in this study.   Some forms of legal protection for customers using internet banking facilities are the existence of the Financial Services Authority Regulation No.38 / POJK.03 / 2016 concerning Application of Risk Management in the Use of Information Technology by Commercial Banks (POJK IT Risk Management). The existence of Article 1 number 12 of Law No. 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions (UU ITE), electronic signatures are signatures consisting of electronic information that is attached, associated or related to other electronic information used as a verification and authentication tool . Another thing that can be done by customers who use internet banking facilities is to conduct customer complaints. Customer complaints are a manifestation of the protection of rights owned by customers, namely the right to be heard. This right is regulated in Article 4 letter d of Law 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection of the PK Law). Whereas in the financial services sector, there is Article 32 of the Financial Services Authority Regulation No. 1 / POJK.07 / 2013 concerning Consumer Protection in the Financial Services Sector (POJK PK) which stipulates that financial service sector business operators must have and carry out customer service and settlement complaints.  The supervision policy carried out by Bank Indonesia towards banks aims to protect the interests of the community and to maintain the continuity of the bank's business as a trust and as an intermediary institution, the supervision is carried out either directly or indirectly

Part III Intermediaries and Financial Promotion, 9 Intermediaries

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
McMeel Gerard
Keyword(s):  
Consumer Protection ◽  
Service Provider ◽  
Financial Services ◽  
Common Law ◽  
Prima Facie ◽  
Financial Services Industry ◽  
The Law ◽  
Services Industry ◽  
The Relationship

This chapter discusses the law governing intermediaries in the financial services industry. The relationship between the various species of intermediary and both the service provider and the customer, is prima facie governed by the rules of agency developed at common law, together with a statutory overlay. The Financial Services Act 1986 introduced the statutory concept of the appointed representative, which allowed regulated persons to appoint other persons for whom they accepted regulatory responsibility, and as a measure of consumer protection initiated a regime of vicarious responsibility, whereby the appointing principal was deemed responsible for everything said or done, or not said or done, by its appointed representatives. That regime was continued and expanded to the whole financial services industry by the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000.

14 Redress

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morris Simon
Keyword(s):  
Consumer Protection ◽  
Financial Services ◽  
Compensation Scheme ◽  
Complaint Handling ◽  
Regulated Firms ◽  
Consumer Interests ◽  
The Way

This chapter concerns the seven principal aspects of redress under the Financial Services and Markets Act (FSMA) 2000. Redress may be due when the primary goal of consumer protection has failed to attain its objective and a customer suffers loss or inconvenience. This chapter considers the Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) requirements for firms with regard to complaint handling. It also looks at the process by which disputes between retail customers and regulated firms can be brought to the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) and the way in which the FOS will decide a dispute. The process by which a designated consumer body can bring complaints to the FCA regarding consumer interests, and the role of the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS), are explained. Finally, the role of consumer redress schemes, restitution orders, and other circumstances where consumers may obtain redress are explained.

scholarly journals PERAN OTORITAS JASA KEUANGAN DALAM PENYELESAIAN PENGADUAN KONSUMEN SEKTOR JASA KEUANGAN

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 236
Author(s):  
Marwah Marwah
Keyword(s):  
Empirical Research ◽  
Consumer Protection ◽  
Financial Services ◽  
Accurate Information ◽  
Business Service ◽  
Services Sector ◽  
Consumer Complaints ◽  
Financial Services Sector ◽  
Laws And Regulations

Abstract                Under the provisions of Article 22 paragraph (1) of the Financial Services Authority Regulation No. 1/POJK.07/2013 on Consumer Protection of the Financial Services Sector, whereas in the case of Business Service Actors using standard agreements, such standard agreements shall be prepared in accordance with the laws and regulations . However, based on the results of the research, in the current banking practice, the agreement format has been prepared unilaterally by the bank in the form of standard conditions set forth in the printed form, and then presented to applicant debtor for approval. This study aimed to find out about the role of the Financial Services Authority as a facilitator in providing accurate information and provide facilities for the settlement of consumer complaints. This research was an empirical research conducted in Makassar city. The results indicated that the Financial Services Authority as a facilitator, not optimal in protecting the mortgage debtor.Key Word : Role of the Financial Services Authority, Debtor Protection Abstrak             Berdasarkan ketentuan Pasal 22 ayat (1) Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 1/POJK.07/2013 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen Sektor Jasa Keuangan, bahwa dalam hal Pelaku Usaha Jasa Keuangan menggunakan perjanjian baku, maka perjanjian baku tersebut wajib disusun sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-undangan. Namun, berdasarkan hasil penelitian, dalam praktik perbankan saat ini, format perjanjian telah disiapkan secara sepihak oleh pihak bank berupa syarat-syarat baku yang dituangkan dalam formulir yang sudah dicetak, dan kemudian disodorkan kepada calon nasabah debitor untuk disetujui. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui mengenai peran Otoritas Jasa Keuangan sebagai fasilitator dalam menyediakan informasi yang akurat serta memberikan fasilitas penyelesaian pengaduan konsumen. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian empiris yang dilaksanakan di kota Makassar. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Otoritas Jasa Keuangan sebagai fasilitator, belum optimal dalam melindungi debitor Kredit Pemilikan Rumah.Kata Kunci : Peran Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, Perlindungan Debitor   

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document