Shoulder Management of the First Time Anterior Shoulder Dislocation

2016 ◽  
pp. 119-122
Author(s):  
Stefano Boschi ◽  
Gianezio Paribelli ◽  
Mario Perretti ◽  
Alfonso Massimo Cassarino
Keyword(s):  
Shoulder Dislocation ◽  
Anterior Shoulder Dislocation ◽  
First Time

scholarly journals Treatment of first-time traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation: the UK TASH-D cohort study

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (18) ◽  
pp. 1-104
Author(s):  
Jonathan L Rees ◽  
Anjali Shah ◽  
Katherine Edwards ◽  
Maria T Sanchez-Santos ◽  
Danielle E Robinson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Shoulder Dislocation ◽  
Recurrent Dislocation ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Anterior Shoulder Dislocation ◽  
Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Dislocation ◽  
The Uk ◽  
First Time ◽  
Residual Confounding ◽  
Age And Sex

Background Shoulder dislocations are the most common joint dislocations seen in emergency departments. Most traumatic cases are anterior and cause recurrent dislocations. Management options include surgical and conservative treatments. There is a lack of evidence about which method is most effective after the first traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation (TASD). Objectives To produce UK age- and sex-specific incidence rates for TASD. To assess whether or not surgery within 6 months of a first-time TASD decreases re-dislocation rates compared with no surgery. To identify clinical predictors of recurrent dislocation. Design A population-based cohort study of first-time TASD patients in the UK. An initial validation study and subsequent propensity-score-matched analysis to compare re-dislocation rates between surgery and no surgery after a first-time TASD. Prediction modelling was used to identify potential predictors of recurrent dislocation. Setting UK primary and secondary care data. Participants Patients with a first-time TASD between 1997 and 2015. Interventions Stabilisation surgery within 6 months of a first-time TASD (compared with no surgery). Stabilisation surgery within 12 months of a first-time TASD was also carried out as a sensitivity analysis. Main outcome measure Re-dislocation rate up to 2 years after the first TASD. Methods Eligible patients were identified from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) (1997–2015). Accuracy of shoulder dislocation coding was internally validated using the CPRD General Practitioner questionnaire service. UK age- and sex-specific incidence rates for TASD were externally validated against rates from the USA and Canada. A propensity-score-matched analysis using linked CPRD and Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data compared re-dislocation rates for patients aged 16–35 years, comparing surgery with no surgery. Multivariable Cox regression models for predicting re-dislocation were developed for the surgical and non-surgical cohorts. Results Shoulder dislocation was coded correctly for 89% of cases in the CPRD [95% confidence interval (CI) 83% to 95%], with a ‘primary’ dislocation confirmed for 76% of cases (95% CI 67% to 85%). Far fewer patients than expected received stabilisation surgery within 6 months of a first TASD, leading to an underpowered study. Around 20% of re-dislocation rates were observed for both surgical and non-surgical patients. The sensitivity analysis at 12 months also showed little difference in re-dislocation rates. Missing data on risk factors limited the value of the prediction modelling; however, younger age, epilepsy and sex (male) were identified as statistically significant predictors of re-dislocation. Limitations Far fewer than the expected number of patients had surgery after a first-time TASD, resulting in an underpowered study. This and residual confounding from missing risk factors mean that it is not possible to draw valid conclusions. Conclusions This study provides, for the first time, UK data on the age- and sex-specific incidence rates for TASD. Most TASD occurs in men, but an unexpected increased incidence was observed in women aged > 50 years. Surgery after a first-time TASD is uncommon in the NHS. Re-dislocation rates for patients receiving surgery after their first TASD are higher than previously expected; however, important residual confounding risk factors were not recorded in NHS primary and secondary care databases, thus preventing useful recommendations. Future work The high incidence of TASD justifies investigation into preventative measures for young men participating in contact sports, as well as investigating the risk factors in women aged > 50 years. A randomised controlled trial would account for key confounders missing from CPRD and HES data. A national TASD registry would allow for a more relevant data capture for this patient group. Study registration Independent Scientific Advisory Committee (ISAC) for the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (ISAC protocol 15_0260). Funding The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

scholarly journals Understanding Preferences for Treatment After Hypothetical First-Time Anterior Shoulder Dislocation: Surveying an Online Panel Utilizing a Novel Shared Decision-Making Tool

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 232596711769578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben Streufert ◽  
Shelby D. Reed ◽  
Lori A. Orlando ◽  
Dean C. Taylor ◽  
Joel C. Huber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Conjoint Analysis ◽  
Shoulder Dislocation ◽  
Recurrent Dislocation ◽  
Nonoperative Treatment ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Anterior Shoulder Dislocation ◽  
Online Panel ◽  
First Time ◽  
Decision Making Tool

Background: Although surgical management of a first-time anterior shoulder dislocation (FTASD) can reduce the risk of recurrent dislocation, other treatment characteristics, costs, and outcomes are important to patients considering treatment options. While patient preferences, such as those elicited by conjoint analysis, have been shown to be important in medical decision-making, the magnitudes or effects of patient preferences in treating an FTASD are unknown. Purpose: To test a novel shared decision-making tool after sustained FTASD. Specifically measured were the following: (1) importance of aspects of operative versus nonoperative treatment, (2) respondents’ agreement with results generated by the tool, (3) willingness to share these results with physicians, and (4) association of results with choice of treatment after FTASD. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A tool was designed and tested using members of Amazon Mechanical Turk, an online panel. The tool included an adaptive conjoint analysis exercise, a method to understand individuals’ perceived importance of the following attributes of treatment: (1) chance of recurrent dislocation, (2) cost, (3) short-term limits on shoulder motion, (4) limits on participation in high-risk activities, and (5) duration of physical therapy. Respondents then chose between operative and nonoperative treatment for hypothetical shoulder dislocation. Results: Overall, 374 of 501 (75%) respondents met the inclusion criteria, of which most were young, active males; one-third reported prior dislocation. From the conjoint analysis, the importance of recurrent dislocation and cost of treatment were the most important attributes. A substantial majority agreed with the tool’s ability to generate representative preferences and indicated that they would share these preferences with their physician. Importance of recurrence proved significantly predictive of respondents’ treatment choices, independent of sex or age; however, activity level was important to previous dislocators. A total of 125 (55%) males and 33 (23%) females chose surgery after FTASD, as did 37% of previous dislocators compared with 45% of nondislocators. Conclusion: When given thorough information about the risks and benefits, respondents had strong preferences for operative treatment after an FTASD. Respondents agreed with the survey results and wanted to share the information with providers. Recurrence was the most important attribute and played a role in decisions about treatment.

scholarly journals Characteristics and management of iatrogenic proximal humeral fracture during manual reduction of shoulder dislocation

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Zhou ◽  
Jianghua Ming ◽  
Shiqing Liu
Keyword(s):  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Shoulder Dislocation ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Proximal Humeral Fracture ◽  
Humeral Fracture ◽  
Anterior Shoulder Dislocation ◽  
Manual Reduction ◽  
The Mean ◽  
First Time

Abstract Purpose This study aimed to investigate the characteristics, management and patient outcomes of iatrogenic proximal humeral fracture during manual reduction of shoulder dislocation. Methods A retrospective chart review from January 2014 to June 2017 identified 10 patients of iatrogenic proximal humeral fracture during shoulder dislocation reduction. The sex and age of patients, associated injuries and location, first-time or habitual shoulder dislocation, the type of anesthesia, the time from injury to revision surgery as well as functional outcomes were analyzed. Results There were 1 male and 9 females (female/male ratio 9:1) with an average age of 66.9 years (range, 50-77 years). All patients presented with first-time anterior shoulder dislocation, and 7 patients (70%) associated with greater tuberosity fractures (GTF). Four patients (40%) underwent reduction under general anesthesia and 6 reduction (60%) under propofol sedation. The revision surgery was performed by open reduction and internal fixation. The mean follow-up period was 18.2 months (range, 12–36 months). The mean visual analog score (VAS) was 3.0 ± 1.6 (range, 1-6), and the mean Neer scores were 82.1 ± 6.5 (range, 71-93). Significant differences were observed in the Neer score and VAS with the time (more or less 8 h) from injury to revision surgery (P < 0.05). Conclusion A high risk of iatrogenic proximal humeral fracture is present in first-time anterior shoulder dislocation with GTF in senile female. Effective reduction and internal fixation performed timely may help to improve functional outcomes in case of iatrogenic injury.

scholarly journals Surgeon Applications of Patient Preferences in Treatment Decision Making for First-Time Anterior Shoulder Dislocation

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 232596712096614
Author(s):  
Brian C. Lau ◽  
Carolyn A. Hutyra ◽  
Benjamin Streufert ◽  
Shelby D. Reed ◽  
Lori A. Orlando ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Patient Preferences ◽  
Shoulder Dislocation ◽  
Treatment Decision ◽  
Activity Level ◽  
Treatment Recommendation ◽  
Anterior Shoulder Dislocation ◽  
Clinical Variables ◽  
Treatment Decision Making ◽  
First Time

Background: Treatment of a first-time anterior shoulder dislocation (FTASD) is sensitive to patient preferences. The operative or nonoperative management debate provides an excellent opportunity to learn how surgeons apply patient preferences in treatment decisions. Purpose: To determine how patient preferences (repeat dislocation risk, recovery difficulties, fear of surgery, treatment costs) and surgeon factors influence a surgeon’s treatment plan for FTASD. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: Eight clinical vignettes of hypothetical patients with FTASD (including age, sex, and activity level) were presented to members of the Magellan Society. A second set of matched vignettes with patient preferences and clinical variables were also presented. The vignettes represented scenarios in which evidence does not favor one treatment over another. Respondents were asked how they would manage each hypothetical case. Respondents also estimated the risk of redislocation for the nonoperative cases for comparison with the published rates. Finally, respondents completed a Likert-scale questionnaire to determine their perceptions on factors influencing their decisions. Results: A total of 103 orthopaedic surgeons completed the survey; 48% practiced in an academic hospital; 79% were in practice for 10 years or longer; and 75% had completed a sports medicine fellowship. Patient preferences were the single most important factor influencing treatment recommendation, with activity type and age also important. Just 62% of the surgeon estimates of the risk of redislocation were consistent with the published rates. The inclusion of patient preferences to clinical variables changed treatment recommendations in 62.5% of our hypothetical cases. Respondents rated patient treatment preference as the leading factor in their treatment decision making. Conclusion: Patient preferences were important when deciding the appropriate treatment for FTASD. Respondents were inconsistent when applying evidence in their decision making and estimates of recurrent instability. Decision support tools that deliver patient preferences and personalized evidence-based outcome estimates improve the quality of decision making at the point of care.

scholarly journals Conservative management of first-time traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benedikt Schliemann ◽  
Marvin Minkus ◽  
Dominik Seybold ◽  
Markus Scheibel
Keyword(s):  
Conservative Management ◽  
Shoulder Dislocation ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Anterior Shoulder Dislocation ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Dislocation ◽  
First Time

AbstractTraumatic anterior shoulder dislocation is a common injury in young and active patients and the proper treatment is still a matter of debate. The recurrence rate after conservative management remains high and, therefore, primary surgical intervention is sometimes recommended in very young patients whose risk of recurrences is highest. Immobilization in external rotation, first described by Itoi, is a promising conservative option as it provides adequate labral reduction and low recurrence rates. Recent meta-analyzes could not unequivocally demonstrate its superiority over internal rotation immobilization. However, biomechanical and early clinical results show a better effect on reduction of the labrum and lower recurrence rates for immobilization in a combination of abduction/external rotation than for external rotation alone. The present article aims to provide an overview of the conservative management of first-time traumatic shoulder dislocation in order to provide the treating physician or surgeon with the best current evidence as a basis for developing the appropriate treatment strategy for the patient.

scholarly journals Who will redislocate his/her shoulder? Predicting recurrent instability following a first traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. e000447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margie K Olds ◽  
Richard Ellis ◽  
Priya Parmar ◽  
Paula Kersten
Keyword(s):  
Shoulder Dislocation ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Recurrent Dislocation ◽  
Multivariate Logistic Regression Model ◽  
Anterior Shoulder Dislocation ◽  
Predictive Tool ◽  
Recurrent Instability ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Dislocation ◽  
First Time

ObjectiveTo develop a multivariate tool that would predict recurrent instability after a first-time traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation.MethodsParticipants (aged 16–40 years) were recruited across New Zealand into a prospective cohort study. Baseline data were collected during a telephone interview and through examination of radiology records. Variables associated with recurrent instability were selected for the multivariate logistic regression model using backwards selection (p<0.10). Coefficients for those variables retained in the model were used to develop the predictive tool.ResultsAmong the 128 participants, 36% had redislocated at least once in the first 12 months. Univariate analysis showed an increased likelihood of recurrent dislocation with bony Bankart lesions (OR=3.65, 95% CI 1.05 to 12.70, p=0.04) and participants who had: not been immobilised in a sling (OR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.98, p=0.05), higher levels of shoulder activity (OR=1.13, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.27, p=0.03), higher levels of pain and disability (OR=1.03, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.06, p=0.02), higher levels of fear of reinjury (OR=1.12, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.26, p=0.04) and decreased quality of life (OR=1.01, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.02, p=0.05). There was no significant difference in those with non-dominant compared with dominant shoulder dislocations (p=0.10) or in those aged 16–25 years compared with 26–40 years (p=0.07).ConclusionSix of seven physical and psychosocial factors can be used to predict recurrent shoulder instability following a first-time traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document