Comparison of Evaluation Standards for Green Building

Author(s):  
Wenjing Cui ◽  
Lin Zhang ◽  
Jianghong Cao
Energies ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 976 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinqiu Li ◽  
Qingqin Wang ◽  
Hao Zhou

Released green building evaluation standards for operation stage include a huge number of indicators, which are very comprehensive and systematic. However, the indicators of these standards are very complicated and a large amount of time and manpower are consumed for their evaluation. To evaluate the operational performance of green buildings more practically and efficiently, some studies collect the operational data for part of the indicators (mainly focusing on building energy performance, indoor environmental quality or occupant satisfaction), which are too rough to evaluate the performance of green building. This paper proposed a total of 27 key performance indicators (KPIs) for green building operations monitoring. The number of proposed indicators is much fewer than the evaluation standards, as well as suitable for long-term monitoring, which can dramatically reduce evaluation time and cost. On the other hand, the indicators involving Outdoor environmental quality, Indoor environmental quality, HVAC system, P&D system, Renewable energy system, Total resource consumption and User behavior, which are more comprehensive and systematic than the conventional monitoring studies for operational performance of green building. Firstly, an indicators library for operations monitoring of green building was established based on relevant standards and literature review in this field. Secondly, “SMART” principle and Delphi method were adopted to select the key performance indicators for green building operations monitoring. Different background experts regarding green building industry were chosen to screen the most relevant, accessible and measurable indicators. Subsequently, two projects in China were selected for case study of key performance indicators proposed in this paper for green building operations monitoring to validate the feasibility and advancement.


2013 ◽  
Vol 291-294 ◽  
pp. 949-953 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bin Quan Zhang ◽  
Yong Sheng Chen

In this paper, we analyze LEED and Green Standard, from macroscopic to microscopic views. We reveal the major way to promote green building construction, green building theory and the practice of exploration and innovation. Weight factor between LEED and Green Standard bears different roles and the roadmap of green building is illustrated.


2014 ◽  
Vol 919-921 ◽  
pp. 1685-1689
Author(s):  
Hao Zhang

Green building evaluation standards provide references for green building design. This paper did comparative and empirical research on evaluation points and design strategies of Chinese Green Building Evaluation Standard and American LEED-NC 2009, and analyzed the differences between their orientation and applicability. The conclusion shows that the strategy of GBES is more suitable for local green buildings in China.


2011 ◽  
Vol 71-78 ◽  
pp. 4166-4169
Author(s):  
Shu Liang Liu ◽  
Peng Liang Hao ◽  
Yun Xia Song

Green building is the inevitable trend of future building development, many countries have formed their own green building assessment system. For now at stage of rapid development of urbanization in China, the establishment of green building assessment system and its further improved are of great significance. As a scientific evaluation system, the index of green building assessment system should have a sound weights system. This article attempts to apply the Analytic hierarchy process method to the Green Building evaluation standards of China, which intend to explore the method of constructing the weight system of China Green Building Evaluation standards.


2017 ◽  
Vol 68 ◽  
pp. 262-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yurong Zhang ◽  
Jingjing Wang ◽  
Fangfang Hu ◽  
Yuanfeng Wang

2011 ◽  
Vol 368-373 ◽  
pp. 854-858
Author(s):  
Ming Zhe Gao ◽  
Hui Min Li ◽  
Hua Tang ◽  
Qi Nan Cao

Based on the analysis of the economic evaluation of green building, taking references of 《Evaluation standards of green building》 (GB / T 50378-2006), indicators reflecting the economy of green building are selected through expert scoring method and fuzzy statistics method .Furthermore, a comprehensive evaluation model is established based on principle of fuzzy mathematics through the application of AHP aiming at determining the index weight. All above is to provide a wider perspective for the economic evaluation of green building.


2014 ◽  
Vol 507 ◽  
pp. 163-167
Author(s):  
Bin Fan ◽  
Xue Yi Zhao

Based on the Evaluation Standard for Green Building in China, this paper compares evaluation standards of other countries and finds some disadvantages in domestic evaluation system by analyzing their advantages.


2021 ◽  
Vol 233 ◽  
pp. 01109
Author(s):  
Liu Jun ◽  
Liu Chunfeng ◽  
Peng Fang ◽  
Zhao Jing

This paper compares the evaluation standards of new and old green buildings, and studies the existing evaluation system of Expressway Green Service area, this paper expounds the relationship between the existing Green Service area evaluation system and the new and old green building standards, and finally, combining the new green building evaluation standards and the actual evaluation work, advances the new Green Service Area Evaluation Index, it will guide the revision of the relevant policy standard of the current Green Service area.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document