Comparing the Core Evaluation System for Green Building at Home and Broad

2014 ◽  
Vol 507 ◽  
pp. 163-167
Author(s):  
Bin Fan ◽  
Xue Yi Zhao

Based on the Evaluation Standard for Green Building in China, this paper compares evaluation standards of other countries and finds some disadvantages in domestic evaluation system by analyzing their advantages.

2021 ◽  
Vol 233 ◽  
pp. 01109
Author(s):  
Liu Jun ◽  
Liu Chunfeng ◽  
Peng Fang ◽  
Zhao Jing

This paper compares the evaluation standards of new and old green buildings, and studies the existing evaluation system of Expressway Green Service area, this paper expounds the relationship between the existing Green Service area evaluation system and the new and old green building standards, and finally, combining the new green building evaluation standards and the actual evaluation work, advances the new Green Service Area Evaluation Index, it will guide the revision of the relevant policy standard of the current Green Service area.


2014 ◽  
Vol 919-921 ◽  
pp. 1685-1689
Author(s):  
Hao Zhang

Green building evaluation standards provide references for green building design. This paper did comparative and empirical research on evaluation points and design strategies of Chinese Green Building Evaluation Standard and American LEED-NC 2009, and analyzed the differences between their orientation and applicability. The conclusion shows that the strategy of GBES is more suitable for local green buildings in China.


2011 ◽  
Vol 71-78 ◽  
pp. 4166-4169
Author(s):  
Shu Liang Liu ◽  
Peng Liang Hao ◽  
Yun Xia Song

Green building is the inevitable trend of future building development, many countries have formed their own green building assessment system. For now at stage of rapid development of urbanization in China, the establishment of green building assessment system and its further improved are of great significance. As a scientific evaluation system, the index of green building assessment system should have a sound weights system. This article attempts to apply the Analytic hierarchy process method to the Green Building evaluation standards of China, which intend to explore the method of constructing the weight system of China Green Building Evaluation standards.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Long Jin ◽  
Xingguang Yang ◽  
Hao Yao

At present, there is no perfect theoretical system for the technical and economic evaluation of green buildings. According to the life cycle assessment, cost/benefit analysis theory, etc., based on the evaluation index of the national standard “Green Building Evaluation Standard”, the technical and economic evaluation system of green building is established, and the technical and economic evaluation of green building is carried out by way of example. Improve the evaluation index system of green buildings.


Author(s):  
Meryem Geçimli ◽  
Ruşen Yamaçlı

Sustainability is defined as it meets the needs of present without compromising the ability of future generation’s needs. Today the topic of sustainability has the urgent importance. Especially buildings consume large amount of energy and resources. Construction sector has great impact on environment. During construction process, occupancy, renovations and/or restorations and demolition, buildings consume energy, water and sources. They are also generating waste and emit harmful atmospheric emissions. Since 1990’s countries had issued a series green building assessment scheme. Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) developed by United States of America, Building Research Establishment’s Assessment Method (BREEAM) developed by United Kingdom and German Sustainable Building Council (DGNB) developed by Germany are the most commonly used. There is now a proliferation of standards, rating and certification systems to assistance in order to deliver sustainable building in the marketplace. It is estimated that there are nearly 600 green certifications around the world. Green building rating programs vary in their approach with some outlining prerequisites and optional credits. Turkey and Bulgaria have some historical partnerships. So it can be useful to compare current situation of two countries in terms of green building certification. The comparison includes certification systems used in two countries. Bulgaria mainly depends on DGNB which is originally German evaluation system. Besides this some projects took LEED and BREEAM, as in Turkey. But the important difference in two countries is that Turkey has been developing its local system that is called Turkish Green Building Council (BEST). Thus in this paper the comparison mainly depends on BEST and DGNB. And also the certified projects in two countries are compared quantitatively. The benchmarks of two systems are compared in terms of similarities and differences. The characteristics of either standard system were summarized and some suggestions for improving Turkey’s evaluation standard for green building were proposed


2015 ◽  
Vol 744-746 ◽  
pp. 2267-2270
Author(s):  
Ling Feng Ji

The low carbon sustainable residential evaluation system devotes to saving energy, reducing emission, and optimizing the living environment, which plays a key role in coping with global warming and the sustainable development of human. It was introduced and analyzed comprehensively the most representative international residential appraisal systems—British Code for Sustainable House, American LEED, Japanese CASBEE, Chinese Evaluation Standard for Green Building and Chinese Ecological Residential Assessment Manual from the aspects of development process, evaluation content, evaluation software, evaluation system marketization, public education and so forth. It was also analyze the advantages and limitations of those residential evaluation systems, and put forward the problems of the present Chinese low carbon sustainable residential assessment system and the measures to improve the future low carbon sustainable residential evaluation systems.


2011 ◽  
Vol 280 ◽  
pp. 165-170
Author(s):  
Shi Jin Wang

Green building materials as an important factor plays important role in the promote sustainable development. However, at present a unified understanding on the green building materials in China have not been formed,the evaluation system of green building materials is not perfect.In this paper,the concept and features of green building materials are discussed deeply,and life cycle model is used to evaluate the green building materials.The status and future trend of green building materials are discussed too.


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 25-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Hedegaard ◽  
N. Lyberth

This paper discuss principles for the design of a tool to screen 3- and 5-year-old children’s social situation of development in Greenland. We describe this tool as radical-local, building it on a theory of child development that focuses on children´s activities as cultural, anchored in local conditions and traditions, where play is seen as the core activity for preschool children. In constructing Investigating children’s situation of development (Undersøgelse af børns udviklingssituation — UBUS 3 and UBUS 5) we have aimed at creating an instrument that can be used to evaluate children’s health, wellbeing and activities in their everyday settings of day-care and at home in Greenland. The assessment focus on interaction with care-persons and other children, not on children’s abilities as isolated and independent features. For preschool children these conditions and their participation in these conditions create the child’s social situation of development.


2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mike Leslie ◽  
Nishendra Moodley ◽  
Ian Goldman ◽  
Christel Jacob ◽  
Donna Podems ◽  
...  

The article explains the rationale for the development of standards for evaluation practice, the process followed in developing those standards, and how those standards inform the quality assessment of evaluations. Quality assessment of evaluations are conducted as a routine activity of the South African National Evaluation System (NES). The importance of quality assessment for improving the state of evaluation practice in South Africa is illustrated by presenting results from the quality assessments undertaken to date. The paper concludes by discussing the progress on the development of a public Evaluations Repository to manage and provide access to completed evaluations and their quality assessment results, and offering some concluding analytical remarks.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document