Recommendation System Based on Machine Learning and Deep Learning in Varied Perspectives: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
pp. 419-432
Author(s):  
T. B. Lalitha ◽  
P. S. Sreeja
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Deep Learning ◽  
Recommendation System

scholarly journals Comparison Study on Improved Movie Recommender Systems

Webology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (Special Issue 04) ◽  
pp. 1470-1478
Author(s):  
R. Lavanya ◽  
Ebani Gogia ◽  
Nihal Rai
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Machine Learning ◽  
Deep Learning ◽  
Recommendation System ◽  
Singular Value ◽  
Experimental Result ◽  
Comparison Study ◽  
Deep Learning Neural Network ◽  
Value Decomposition ◽  
Crucial Part

Recommendation system is a crucial part of offering items especially in services that offer streaming. For streaming movie services on OTT, RS are a helping hand for users in finding new movies for leisure. In this paper, we propose a machine learning an approach based on auto encoders to produce a CF system which outputs movie rating for a user based on a huge DB of ratings from other users. Utilising Movie Lens dataset, we explore the use of deep learning neural network based Stacked Auto encoders to predict user s ratings on new movies, thereby enabling movie recommendations. We consequently implement Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) to recommend movies to users. The experimental result showcase that our R S out performs a user-based neighbourhood baseline in terms of MSE on predicted ratings and in a survey in which user judge between recommendation s from both systems.

scholarly journals ViraMiner: Deep Learning on Raw DNA Sequences for Identifying Viral Genomes in Human Samples

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ardi Tampuu ◽  
Zurab Bzhalava ◽  
Joakim Dillner ◽  
Raul Vicente
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Deep Learning ◽  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Recommendation System ◽  
Clinical Importance ◽  
Training Dataset ◽  
Viral Genomes ◽  
Human Samples ◽  
Types Of Information ◽  
Improved Accuracy

ABSTRACTDespite its clinical importance, detection of highly divergent or yet unknown viruses is a major challenge. When human samples are sequenced, conventional alignments classify many assembled contigs as “unknown” since many of the sequences are not similar to known genomes. In this work, we developed ViraMiner, a deep learning-based method to identify viruses in various human biospecimens. ViraMiner contains two branches of Convolutional Neural Networks designed to detect both patterns and pattern-frequencies on raw metagenomics contigs. The training dataset included sequences obtained from 19 metagenomic experiments which were analyzed and labeled by BLAST. The model achieves significantly improved accuracy compared to other machine learning methods for viral genome classification. Using 300 bp contigs ViraMiner achieves 0.923 area under the ROC curve. To our knowledge, this is the first machine learning methodology that can detect the presence of viral sequences among raw metagenomic contigs from diverse human samples. We suggest that the proposed model captures different types of information of genome composition, and can be used as a recommendation system to further investigate sequences labeled as “unknown” by conventional alignment methods. Exploring these highly-divergent viruses, in turn, can enhance our knowledge of infectious causes of diseases.

scholarly journals Automatic Pulmonary Nodule Detection Applying Deep Learning or Machine Learning Algorithms to the LIDC-IDRI Database: A Systematic Review

Diagnostics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lea Pehrson ◽  
Michael Nielsen ◽  
Carsten Ammitzbøl Lauridsen
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Deep Learning ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Ct Scans ◽  
Lung Nodules ◽  
Original Research ◽  
Feature Based ◽  
High Level ◽  
Meta Analyses

The aim of this study was to provide an overview of the literature available on machine learning (ML) algorithms applied to the Lung Image Database Consortium Image Collection (LIDC-IDRI) database as a tool for the optimization of detecting lung nodules in thoracic CT scans. This systematic review was compiled according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Only original research articles concerning algorithms applied to the LIDC-IDRI database were included. The initial search yielded 1972 publications after removing duplicates, and 41 of these articles were included in this study. The articles were divided into two subcategories describing their overall architecture. The majority of feature-based algorithms achieved an accuracy >90% compared to the deep learning (DL) algorithms that achieved an accuracy in the range of 82.2%–97.6%. In conclusion, ML and DL algorithms are able to detect lung nodules with a high level of accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity using ML, when applied to an annotated archive of CT scans of the lung. However, there is no consensus on the method applied to determine the efficiency of ML algorithms.

scholarly journals OTHR-12. The development of machine learning algorithms for the differentiation of glioma and brain metastases – a systematic review

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii17-iii17
Author(s):  
Waverly Rose Brim ◽  
Leon Jekel ◽  
Gabriel Cassinelli Petersen ◽  
Harry Subramanian ◽  
Tal Zeevi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Deep Learning ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Search Strategy ◽  
Controlled Vocabulary ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Average Score ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Therapeutic Decisions

Abstract Purpose Medical staging, surgical planning, and therapeutic decisions are significantly different for brain metastases versus gliomas. Machine learning (ML) algorithms have been developed to differentiate these pathologies. We performed a systematic review to characterize ML methods and to evaluate their accuracy. Methods Studies on the application of machine learning in neuro-oncology were searched in Ovid Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane trials (CENTRAL) and Web of science core-collection. A search strategy was designed in compliance with a clinical librarian and confirmed by a second librarian. The search strategy comprised of controlled vocabulary including artificial intelligence, machine learning, deep learning, magnetic resonance imaging, and glioma. The initial search was performed in October 2020 and then updated in February 2021. Candidate articles were screened in Covidence by at least two reviewers each. A bias analysis was conducted in agreement with TRIPOD, a bias assessment tool similar to CLAIM. Results Twenty-nine articles were used for data extraction. Four articles specified model development for solitary brain metastases. Classical ML (cML) algorithms represented 85% of models used, while deep learning (DL) accounted for 15%. cML algorithms performed with an average accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 82%, 78%, 88%, respectively; DL performed 84%, 79%, 81%. The support vector machine (SVM) algorithm was the most common used cML model in the literature and convolutional neural networks (CNN) were standard for DL models. We also found T1, T1 post-gadolinium and T2 sequences were most commonly used for feature extraction. Preliminary TRIPOD analysis yielded an average score of 14.25 (range 8–18). Conclusion ML algorithms that can accurately classify glioma from brain metastases have been developed. SVM and CNN are leading approaches with high accuracy. Standardized algorithm performance reporting is a clear limitation to be addressed in future studies.

scholarly journals Computer-Aided Diagnosis Systems in Diagnosing Malignant Thyroid Nodules on Ultrasonography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 186-193
Author(s):  
Lei Xu ◽  
Junling Gao ◽  
Quan Wang ◽  
Jichao Yin ◽  
Pengfei Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Deep Learning ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Thyroid Nodules ◽  
Computer Aided Diagnosis ◽  
Cad Systems ◽  
Cad System ◽  
Computer Aided ◽  
Aided Diagnosis

Background: Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems are being applied to the ultrasonographic diagnosis of malignant thyroid nodules, but it remains controversial whether the systems add any accuracy for radiologists. Objective: To determine the accuracy of CAD systems in diagnosing malignant thyroid nodules. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies on the diagnostic performance of CAD systems. The diagnostic performance was assessed by pooled sensitivity and specificity, and their accuracy was compared with that of radiologists. The present systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42019134460). Results: Nineteen studies with 4,781 thyroid nodules were included. Both the classic machine learning- and the deep learning-based CAD system had good performance in diagnosing malignant thyroid nodules (classic machine learning: sensitivity 0.86 [95% CI 0.79–0.92], specificity 0.85 [95% CI 0.77–0.91], diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) 37.41 [95% CI 24.91–56.20]; deep learning: sensitivity 0.89 [95% CI 0.81–0.93], specificity 0.84 [95% CI 0.75–0.90], DOR 40.87 [95% CI 18.13–92.13]). The diagnostic performance of the deep learning-based CAD system was comparable to that of the radiologists (sensitivity 0.87 [95% CI 0.78–0.93] vs. 0.87 [95% CI 0.85–0.89], specificity 0.85 [95% CI 0.76–0.91] vs. 0.87 [95% CI 0.81–0.91], DOR 40.12 [95% CI 15.58–103.33] vs. DOR 44.88 [95% CI 30.71–65.57]). Conclusions: The CAD systems demonstrated good performance in diagnosing malignant thyroid nodules. However, experienced radiologists may still have an advantage over CAD systems during real-time diagnosis.

NIMG-23. MACHINE LEARNING METHODS IN GLIOMA GRADE PREDICTION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi133-vi133
Author(s):  
Ryan Bahar ◽  
Sara Merkaj ◽  
W R Brim ◽  
Harry Subramanian ◽  
Tal Zeevi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Deep Learning ◽  
Controlled Vocabulary ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Clinical Implementation ◽  
Grade Prediction ◽  
Full Text Review ◽  
Average Patient

Abstract PURPOSE Machine learning (ML) technologies have demonstrated highly accurate prediction of glioma grade, though it is unclear which methods and algorithms are superior. We have conducted a systematic review of the literature in order to identify the ML applications most promising for future research and clinical implementation. MATERIALS AND METHODS A literature review, in agreement with PRISMA, was conducted by a university librarian in October 2020 and verified by a second librarian in February 2021 using four databases: Cochrane trials (CENTRAL), Ovid Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, and Web of Science core-collection. Keywords and controlled vocabulary included artificial intelligence, machine learning, deep learning, radiomics, magnetic resonance imaging, glioma, and glioblastoma. Screening of publications was done in Covidence, and TRIPOD was used for bias assessment. RESULTS The search identified 11,727 candidate articles with 1,135 articles undergoing full text review. 86 articles published since 1995 met the criteria for our study. 79% of the articles were published between 2018 and 2020. The average glioma prediction accuracy of the highest performing model in each study was 90% (range: 53% to 100%). The most common algorithm used for cML studies was Support Vector Machine (SVM) and for DL studies was Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). BRATS and TCIA datasets were used in 47% of the studies, with the average patient number of study datasets being 186 (range: 23 to 662). The average number of features used in machine learning prediction was 55 (range: 2 to 580). Classical machine learning (cML) was the primary machine learning model in 68% of studies, with deep learning (DL) used in 32%. CONCLUSIONS Using multimodal sequences in ML methods delivers significantly higher grading accuracies than single sequences. Potential areas of improvement for ML glioma grade prediction studies include increasing sample size, incorporating molecular subtypes, and validating on external datasets.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document